Legacy

Liberals Don’t Have a Leg to Stand On

By Karl C. Priest April 30, 2010 (revised 5-14-19)

I sent a tongue-in-cheek email to a liberal friend. I was poking fun at the reaction of liberals to the Muslim threats against the people behind the South Park television show.

Following is an email exchange that resulted.

Me: Brave liberals at work. http://livefeed.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/04/south-park-censorship-.html

Lib: You think that the South Park guys are brave? Quite frankly, I am not sure what to think.  I don't know if they are brave or stupid. 

Me: Like a liberal--it goes right over your head.

Lib: Like a conservative who resorts to classifying the opposition into simplistic stereotypes, you, apparently, have just done that with me.  Now, I would really appreciate it if you would consider stepping beyond your image of me as a two dimensional cartoon character of a liberal and entertain my sincerely submitted question.  I really would like to know the answer.

Me: OK, grasshopper.  ; )

Liberals are hypocritical cowards.  They have put an image of Jesus in urine and an image of Mary in cow manure.  They constantly ridicule Bible believing Christians.  They know that, if we (Bible believers) are consistent with what we believe, they (liberals) are safe.  They will not touch--(or in the case of South Park) they touch lightly then run and hide--the Muslim religion.  Liberals know that the Muslim belief of head chopping is consistent with what old Mohamed taught.

There is all kinds of room for comedy routines over the way Muslims treat women.  Can you point me to any?  Letterman?  SNL?  MTV?  Also, if feminists were not liberal cowards, they would be storming every American Mosque in protest of how Muslim women are treated in countries that truly follow the Koran.

Liberals shed no tears over millions of butchered babies (due to abortion) yet they get in a huff when an American missile kills a few civilians that usually are in the area so that Muslim "warriors" can hide behind them.

Liberals think homosexuality is "gay".  Science says otherwise.  I asked Rockefeller and Byrd to kindly tell me that anal intercourse is normal and healthy.  They did not respond.  So, you go ahead and tell me it is.  If you do not--then maybe you are more conservative than you think.

You, as I told you a few months ago,will move toward liberal looniness or conservative common sense. God sent you across my path at a time where you were standing on the precipice.  You cannot stand with one foot on each side.  Think about the analogy.

I still have high hopes for you.

With respect.

Lib (Me in italics): I guess if we are going to go with this "Grasshopper" analogy, should I address you as "Old Blind Man"?

If it fits--go ahead.

I am not going to go point by point with you, I just wanted to get a clarification on your take on the Parker/Stone situation with the threats from Muslim extremists.  Thanks for giving your POV.

Because you cannot and retain any sense of reason.

Interesting that there was no mention of homosexuality in the situation and I didn't mention it in my terse e-mail to you, but yet you worked it in to your response.  Hmm.

You did not answer my question/challenge.  Byrd and Rockefeller would be proud of you.

See response to your second statement.

Me: (After a couple of days with no response)

Since you did not answer my question about the healthiness and naturalness of the sodomite practice of anal intercourse, I will pose some other questions for you. First, let me explain some things.

I posed the first question because I had just viewed a news clip of pro-sodomy hecklers berating Obama because he has not yet decimated America’s military by repealing “don’t ask—don’t tell.” That particular issue is only one of three of which I take a keen interest.

Liberalism can be depicted as a three-legged stool. The seat part has various layers which are easily peeled away. The layers consists of relatively minor foolishness such as global warming hysteria and various entitlements and more serious idiocy such as immigration and national defense policies.

The stool legs represent the most insidious part of the worldview of liberalism.

Homosexuality is one leg. The other two are abortion (baby killing) and evolutionism.

Here are some questions for you. When does life begin? Where is the evidence of spontaneous generation?

It is too much like a cat playing with a mouse when a conservative poses those questions to a liberal. The liberal has to come to his senses or be willingly ignorant of science. Is the latter where you want to take your stand?

I’d like to see you turn from liberalism. Much more importantly, you should answer (in your heart) the questions posed in Mark 8:36-38:

[ 36] For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?
[ 37] Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?
[ 38] Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the glory of his Father with the holy angels.

Lots of conservatives are heading for hell. The way off that path is not through philosophy.

I stand ready to help you get off that broad way. Matthew 7:13-14:

[13 ] Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:
[ 14] Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

See http://insectman.us/getsaved.htm for a road map.

---------------------------------

More about liberals:
"Lounging in Liberal Land"
"Liberalism is Evil"
“Liberals Lambasted”

Liberal Propaganda Exposed

Also see "Karl Quits Conservatism".

LEGACY INDEX