Insectman Home
Contact Us
My Testimony
Our Links
Get Saved
Exodus Mandate
The Lie: Evolution


CLICK HERE for the most important page on this website.

This article and those on abortion, homosexuality, evolutionism, racism, and Islam fit what Dr. Martin Luther King said: “Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' But conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but because conscience tells one it is right.”

“If you have an important point to make, don’t try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time – a tremendous whack.” (Winston Churchill) When this article was written I was unaware of this quote. It is so very appropriate because, “Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.” (Attributed to Dietrich Bonhoeffer.)

"A wiseman's heart is at his right hand; but a fool's heart at his left."  (Ecc. 10:2 KJB) (Emphasis mine)

Liberalism IS Evil!
(Compromised Conservatism is too

By Karl Priest January 6, 2015 (Revised 12-0-2017 at Addendum/Footnotes #10.)

If liberalism is compared to roach infestation then it must be eradicated. Liberals are vindictive, vicious and vile. “The wicked plotteth against the just, and gnasheth upon him with his teeth. The Lord shall laugh at him: for he seeth that his day is coming.” Psalms 37:12-13

This page is intended to be a resource page on the evil (wickedness) of liberalism and will be updated as items and ideas arrive. Most updates will be additions to the Addendum. Footnotes within the body of the article may not be in consecutive order.) I have used many verbatim quotes from various veracity expounders and have designated such with quotation marks, some italics, and always hot-linked to the source.

[Addendum/Footnotes: 1=Background 2=Liberalism Explained 3=Liberalism Rejected 4=Laughing at Liberalism 5=Environmentalism & Climate Change 6=Bible 7=Christianity 8=Tolerance 9=Guns 10=Homosexuality & ETC. 11=Politics & Government 12=Military 13= Miscellaneous 14=Racism 15=Education 16=Abortion (baby murder) 17=Capital Punishment 18=Evolutionism 19= Sexism/Feminism 20=Conservative Compromise 21= Religion & Humanism/Atheism 22= Islam 23= Immigration 24=Burt's Bombs

“How can anyone successfully diagnose dementia in an aging liberal? I mean, what’s the tipoff? Do they suddenly wake up one day in their seventies or eighties and start making sense?” Burt Preluksy (See last footnote.)


This article (1) is not intended to be a study of the history of liberalism. Neither is it an attempt to distinguish between progressivism and liberalism. Each has become so inter-twined that, for all practical purposes, there is no difference. Actually, liberalism is so lousy that it has blended with socialism, communism, and fascism. If America is the human body, then progressives are pathogens, leftists are lesions, socialists are STDs, fascists are fatal fractures, communists are cancers, and liberals are lupus. All conditions are lethal and life-threatening. Another synonym is secularism. “Secularism and communism are the same thing. They’re godless. They’re anti-Christ." If you want to study the political subject deeper, besides the dictionary and Wikipedia, I have listed some sources (with different points-of-view) in the addendum (2).

A true liberal is someone who is open to all ways of thinking. Such a person is rare and maybe already extinct. Actually, conservatives are more tolerant of others than professing liberals. There are some likeable liberals. It is their ideology that is insidious. “ The left's (liberalism’s) vision is not only a vision of the world, but also a vision of themselves, as superior beings pursuing superior ends.” says Thomas Sowell.

Lots of kind-hearted folks have been taken in by the Democrat Party which should be called the Liberal Party. Liberals, as individuals, must be prayerfully encouraged to reach out to reality and, actually, REPENT. Some can be lovingly led to the light. (3) The ones who refuse subject themselves to the consequences (exposure as frauds and fools) of clinging to their dogma of liberalism. Liberalism must undergo a full frontal attack of facts and farce until only the most fanatical adherents continue to confess that woeful worldview. (4)

Everyone needs to have a Popeye Moment regarding evolutionism.

Compromising Christians are like leprosy, but liberals are the most dangerous threat to America. Communists are like poisonous snakes. Muslims are like rabid dogs. Liberals are like lethal cancer. Liberals are our enemies. We don't shoot them, or shout them down, but they must be shut down by scoffing them into silence.  

Since I have a keen interest in insects, another analogy of liberalism to America comes to mind. A beautiful, healthy caterpillar can be attacked by a parasitic wasp who places her eggs inside the caterpillar. The insertion is hardly noticed and the caterpillar goes on about its business. The eggs hatch and the larvae (baby wasps) begin to drink the caterpillar’s blood, but avoid damaging the vital organs. The larvae “soon become masters of their unwillingly accommodating slave.” The caterpillar’s immune system is disabled by a virus that came with the wasp eggs. The caterpillar has to eat 1½ times as much food as it normally would and soon becomes bloated with the growing larvae weighing nearly a third of its weight. After a period of time the larvae secrete a chemical that paralyzes the caterpillar and they begin cutting their way to the outside. Next they spin cocoons and the zombie caterpillar uses its own cocoon silk to cover the wasps at this stage of their lives. The caterpillar “stays near the cocoons like some kind of brainwashed guardian” fighting off attacks from enemies of the wasps until the caterpillar starves to death. The caterpillar is America and the wasps are liberals!

An unsaved Jew expresses why hatred is sometimes necessary. “Hating evil is just as important as loving the good. Because if you don’t, you’re likely to give evil a pass… To be truly righteous, it’s not enough to love good people. You have to hate—and fight—bad people… But, on the political left (11), hatred has gone out of vogue… Many of the mainline Protestant denominations speak of loving one’s enemies. They quote Jesus as to the need to “turn the other cheek.” But Jesus never said to love God’s enemies, those whose entire existence is dedicated to mayhem and murderer. And he never exhorted his followers to turn the other cheek to those who behead hostages or use children to blow up American soldiers… Those who do not hate the wicked harbor an insufficient love of the innocent. Our responsibility is to protect the vulnerable from the ravenous claws of the terrorists rather than finding excuses for their slaughter… Exhortations to hate all manner of evil abound in the Bible… Martin Luther King, Jr., famously said, ‘We will have to repent in this generation not merely for the vitriolic words and actions of the bad people but for the appalling silence of the good people.’”

Christians and conservatives can no longer be silent or slushy. We must firmly proclaim that liberalism is evil!


“Controlling our own agenda is a learned skill that the enemies of freedom will not respectfully recognize or honor. We must learn to be on the offensive and not expect the enemies of freedom to like it. Being on the offensive often means growing a thicker skin and being purposely offensive when necessary. Trying to always be “nice” is rarely conducive to initiating meaningful reform and political change. Inviting the devil to dinner will get us nowhere.” Timothy D. Manning. Article in the Copperhead Chronicle (Vol. 14, No. 4, 4 th Quarter 2012)

In many years of dealing with liberals who preach the lie of evolutionism, I have concluded that there is no one more narrow-minded than a self-proclaimed “open-minded” liberal.

Liberals are a crying, whiny, unhappy authoritarian lot, but they have been so since I was nine years old. Liberals lost their soul the day JFK died; they have hated and blamed America ever since. They have also impressed that hate and blame upon four subsequent generations. They are utterly out of legitimate complaints. This fact makes them even more whiny and authoritarian as they go after smaller and smaller game armed with the power of regulation and mental suffocation. The left got rid of religion in America so they could become God.”

Liberals viscously verbally attacked Clarence Thomas and Sarah Palin. So much for the liberal lie of caring about blacks and women! Liberals are vicious in vilifying Christians and conservatives, but shriek like little girls if they get criticized. Joshua T. Caldwell correctly calls “ Political Correctness ” c ensorship .” “ To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” (attributed to Voltaire)

A national example of how liberals “play” is the way the IRS targeted the Tea Party and the liberal court ruling that resulted. Liberals jump on any criminal act committed by anyone they can remotely relate to a conservative position.

Just watch liberal commentators on conservative news sites and it is readily apparent that liberals do not want to communicate with conservatives. They do not want to “live and let live”. They want to censor and silence conservatives. It is as if they are on a mission to fervently preach their dogma. Couple that with the evil things promoted by liberalism and liberals become the Devil’s disciples.

Bullies: How the Left’s Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences America by Ben Shapiro was written because “ the left was completely uninterested in political discussion, and instead was interested in resorting to bully tactics to slime their opposition’s character… the left were more interested in demonization than they were in debate… The media are the greatest of all the leftist bullies, because they play at objectivity while sliding the knife in as deep as humanly possible… How can we fight back?... If they lie about us, we will tell the truth about them… We cannot win unless we see this as a war.”

Let’s sic our satirist on liberals. Let’s sink liberalism with sarcasm.


Liberalism is a form of insanity according to Michael Savage in Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder: Savage Solutions.

Dr. Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr., a forensic psychiatrist, explained liberalism in The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness. He said, “The modern liberal mind, its distorted perceptions and its destructive agenda are the product of disturbed personalities.” And “Despite all the evidence against it, the modern liberal mind believes his agenda is good social science. It is, in fact, bad science fiction. He persists in this agenda despite its madness.” Dr. Rossiter also said, liberalism is a “product of psychopathology: a massive transference neurosis acted out in the world's political arenas, with devastating effects on the institutions of liberty.”

I think liberals are merely in state of sensibility stupor. Some of their political and social (immigration, national defense, the environment, gun control, and globalism) range from naïve to nutty. On certain issues, liberal looniness is lethal. They look at a cosmos which has been observed for thousands of years by billions of people as devolving and imagine they see evolution--thereby siding with anti-science. They ignore the overwhelming medical evidence that homosexual behavior is physically and mentally devastating but they promote it (sodomy) as normal. There is nothing “gay" about homosexuality. (10) Liberals look at images of preborn children and say it is acceptable to kill the kids. People either leave liberalism, by taking a ride on the reality road, or slide into senseless stupidly.

Progressive (liberal) icon and the founder of baby-killing Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger was proud to have spoken to a KKK group. She was an advocate of the progressive cause called eugenics. Eugenics is the ultimate evolution. Long loved liberal and KKK leader, the late Robert Byrd, “refused to join the military because he might have to serve alongside ‘race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.’”

“Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over all the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around the table looking victorious.” (anonymous) If it was a sports contest it would be one side (conservatives) playing under the rules with honor and the other side (liberals) cheating at every opportunity. When conservatives score a point, liberals have a temper tantrum. An abiding axiom: LIBERALS LIE. Liberals will cheat, connive, and censor without contrition. If a liberal’s lips are moving he/she is likely speaking lies or spewing lunacy.

Accurate Axioms:
1. Liberals are liars
2. Don't trust anything they say--always verify.
3. Presume verification is not final.

About all liberals do is lie and cry. When they get criticized liberals squeal like stuck piglets forced to take a bath. The males, especially, cry like little girls when they don’t get what they want.

A perpetual postulate: LIBERALS LACK LOGIC. Liberal Logic is lucus a non lucendo (or a misnomer at best). Liberal logic is also an oxymoron. They hate cigarette smoke, but love dope smoke. They see the havoc and heartache caused by alcohol and drug abuse, yet they push (pun intended) illicit drug legalization and are hunky-dory with glorification of booze use. Liberals look at logic like a leech looks at logarithms. It does not compute. Liberals literally live in La La Land.

Speaking of liberal thinking, reminds me of a discussion I had with a religious liberal Charleston Gazette editor. After we exchanged some emails I was struck with the thought that liberals are full of faith, fantasy, and faulty logic.

Liberals love labor unions along with many conservatives, but labor unions are not biblical. Some of my ancestors needed union help during the Coal Mine Wars. Now unions are useless except for helping liberals bring down America. I formerly was an aggressive member (picket captain during West Virginia's major teacher strike) of the NEA/AFT for over 20 years during which I gained firsthand insight that the teacher unions are contributing to the ruination of the United States of America. I left the Union for my last ten, or so, years of my career.

Mother Jones magazine claimed that "more Americans have been killed by conservative terrorists than by Islamic terrorists since September 11, 2001.” When Gabrielle Giffords and others were shot (2011) liberals tried to blame Tea Party rhetoric. In 2013 leading liberals were quick to blame the Boston Marathon attack on conservatives.

Liberals blame guns for murders which is as logical as blaming forks for fat people. More deaths and heartache have occurred due to automobiles than by bullets fired by civilians.

Feminism is a subset of liberalism. So called feminists are not feminine in a wonderful Biblical sense, they are merely liberal females. That, by the way, is not a compliment. The War on Women is waged by loathsome liberals. Allowing women in combat units or on United States warships is an abomination. I know, personally, that going to sea is tough for a man. No woman should have to endure the experience. I can only imagine how that would be compounded in a combat situation. Insect societies such as wasps and ants let the females do the fighting—that is what God designed —that is what God designed for those creatures. Something sadder than a maimed man is a limbless lady. Any healthy male who allows a woman to fight for him is a sissy-boy disgrace. Women are not equal with men physically or emotionally. Women are special, and a happy woman understands God’s design for humans. The Factual Feminist sets the leftist “ladies” straight.

“The disdain liberals have for Western virility is not surprising. America’s traditional male virtues are not compatible with a culture of dependency … Clearly, in order for traditional masculinity to oppress the world as liberals envisioned it, an alternative reality must be created. In the egalitarian paradise imagined by the left, government and laws — not self-reliance or the Second Amendment — protect innocent victims from criminals. This fantasy is similar to imaging that people can choose to be the opposite gender from which they were born, or that America’s masculinity, not liberal ideology, is what plagues the world… In fact, compelling the rest of us to pretend that fantasy (feminine or otherwise) is reality and that lies are truth seems like a diabolical madness in and of itself. Most disturbingly, liberals aim to impose their effeminate affliction on the rest of us as the remedy to all the world’s injustices, as they actually believe that America’s masculinity is the supreme culprit… For a metrosexual narcissist, eunuchs and effeminate men are surely the least threatening types of males. The exotic fantasy to fundamentally transform America into some collectivist Sodom and Gomorrah might be linked to the  purging of masculine men from America’s military… Undermining masculinity also weakens our society in general." 

A second subset of liberalism is environmentalism. (5) God instructed us to be stewards of his creation and specifically to “ replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over” the created creatures (Genesis 1:28), but His Great Commission was to “go ye therefore, and teach all nations” about Jesus Christ. (Matthew 28:19). Liberals are want to save seals rather than souls. Liberals cry over a tree and kill babies with glee. Environmentalism is closely aligned with evolutionism which is part of Earth Worship and a key to the One World Government to come. In this context, it should be noted that “ Nobel Physics laureate Ivar Giaever has called global warming a ‘new religion.’” Biological anthropologist and medical Doctor, Michael Crichton said, “ Today, one of the most powerful religions in the Western World is environmentalism.”Also, Liberal conservationism has proven to do more harm than good.

Another subset of liberalism is “diversity” or “multiculturalism”. Walter Williams called “multiculturalism a ‘cancer on Western society.’ As is typically the case, Professor William is right on target. In fact, I go even further in my assessment of this malignant tenet of secular humanism… (M)ulticulturalism is leftist code for a worldview that seeks the destruction of Christianity and traditional American values… American students are subjected to 12 years of multicultural propaganda in the public schools.”

Allowing an influx of illegal (mostly Mexican) and dangerous (mostly Muslim) immigrants not only flaunts the law, but it sets America up to be taken down. It is like a human drinking a slow acting poison. Allowing our borders to be inundated with illegals is liberal insanity at its best. Not only is it flaunting the law, it is like a human drinking poison. “(It) it is evident in scripture that borders are vital to the stability and order of a civil society…Liberal Churches stand up for illegal immigrants and encourage law breaking...We may fairly conclude that it displays questionable judgment to rigidly construct an immigration policy for 21st century America based on a handful of Scripture passages taken out of context or from particular instances of migration spanning centuries, vastly different nations and kingdoms, wholly different circumstances, etc. found in Scripture…Rather, carefully discerning applicable principles better fits the situation…Americans find immigration policy causing their nation to suffer unnecessary consequences." Also, using a liberal worldview for American foreign policy is asinine. Liberal leadership would have lost the Cold War (Of which I had a very small part.). “ Liberals can keep putting out their silly little movies about the BNOFUM (Black Night of Fascism Under McCarthy), but it's over. The truth is out, for all to see. Documents proving McCarthy's case, as well as the left's campaign of lies about him, will always be just an Amazon click away.”

Only a fool or someone who is intentionally ignorant or someone who is brain-washed or someone who is a liberal—wait, the word “liberal” is a synonym for each of the first three categories—does not realize that Islam is at war with America. Actually, they are at war with the world. They know that if America falls, the rest will too. Any Muslim who is not a strong believer in Jihad is the same as a lukewarm (or fake) Christian. He is not following what his Book says. Whenever liberals cram the Crusades down your throats point them to Four Myths about the Crusades.

Liberals allowed Muslims to have a Muslim service in the National Cathedral claiming Muslims might reciprocate. “But Christian convert and former Muslim Dr. Mark Christian said the gesture will never be reciprocated by Muslims. They would never allow Christians into a mosque sanctuary to hold a Christian-led prayer service. 'No, not ever. They can let Christians and Jews only in the U.S. and West sometimes into their mosques, because they have an agenda, but they will let them in the basement or another room, not in the main sanctuary and certainly not to say a Christian prayer.'” We should "Laugh at Angry Muslims Demanding We take Their Homicidal "Religion" Seriously."

Here is how to lambast liberalism using another one of its pathetic projects: “MSNBC has tanked not only because they have no interest in pretending to be anything other than a Democratic mouthpiece; but because they have nothing substantive to say. Their hosts are ardently Leftist, and their guests are often loons. When I watch MSNBC—more often than not for comic relief–the more I feel like I’ve been drugged, and transported to Russia, circa 1980. It’s Pravda. They will accept anything a guest says, so long as it fits within the architecture the Left has built for them.”

The religion of most liberals is Atheism which is an absurd belief. Atheists face to fallacies in logic. Either an atheist claims to know, without a doubt, that there is no God thereby making himself omniscient or, the atheist makes a faith statement that he does not believe in God. The foundation of atheism is non-existent evolution. "John Lennox, professor of mathematics at the University of Oxford, writes that according to atheism, 'the mind that does science ... is the end product of a mindless unguided process. Now, if you knew your computer was the product of a mindless unguided process, you wouldn't trust it. So, to me atheism undermines the rationality I need to do science.'"

Wazooloo has hilarious videos exposing evolutionism—the basis of liberal religion. When I hear/read True Believers in Evolutionism (TBEs) present “proof” of evolution I hear Twilight Zone music (Do di do do, do di do do Do di do do, do di do do Do di do do, do di do do ) playing.

There is another dimension beyond that which is known to humanity. It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and dark, between sanity and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fear of God and the summit of his understanding. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area which we call Evolutionism. (apology to Rod Sterling)

Beam me up Scotty!

A bigger danger than atheist True Believers in Evolutionism (TBEs) is BioLogos. World magazine reports, “The brainchild of Francis Collins [bluffing True Believer in Evolutionism (TBE) #100], who now heads the National Institutes of Health, BioLogos has taken in nearly $9 million from the Templeton Foundation and millions more from other donors. BioLogos in turn offers grants to church, parachurch, and academic leaders and organizations that promote 'evolutionary creation'…BioLogos president Deb Haarsma, former chair of Calvin’s physics and astronomy department, says churches that support evolution will be more effective witnesses in a culture that reveres science, and will help college students avoid a crisis of faith when biology professors argue for evolution. The BioLogos website states, ‘Genetic evidence shows that humans descended from a group of several thousand individuals who lived about 150,000 years ago.’” (

It must be confusing being a liberal. They look at a pre-born baby via a sonogram and still say it is not a baby. They grieve over a battered animal and have no sympathy at all for a butchered preborn baby. They see life complicated beyond comprehension and they do not see absolutely anything evolving, yet they deny the Creator. They accuse conservatives of racism yet liberals vote for a man strictly for the color of his skin. Racism is not a simple “black and white” matter.  Contradictions consume liberals. They are “willingly ignorant”. (2 Peter 3:5a)

Watching censorship of the Pro-Life message reveals that liberals are dishonest and irrational. An example of how baby killers operate is exemplified be an account of pro-lifers trying to address students on a college campus. “Pro-abortion students, led by the university-funded “Women’s Center” director, became more angry and attempted to drown out Miss (Devorah) Gilman ( Community Liaison for the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform) by shouting. That didn’t work as we turned up the volume on the amplifiers. The pro-aborts became increasingly desperate as they threw coffee at Miss Gilman and tried to pull the plug on our power. At the end of the day, the pro-aborts prevailed on the university president to come out and direct the police to stop our use of our microphone.”

Vaccinations are troubling in potentially more ways than one, but it is ironic that liberals want to force children to have a potentially dangerous substance injected into the children’s bodies while claiming that the bodies of pregnant women are solely that of the women.

Liberals (mainly Hollywood highbrows) who exercise, energize, and surgically excise to look good and the shallow people who admire them. What makes a make-up covered talented human being have a more valued opinion than that of natural hard-working country folk? They both need deodorant. Folks who listen to Hollywood do not perceive the great common denominator—the grave.

Al Gore is a great example of goofy liberals. Gore gets on common guys for gas guzzling while his own lifestyle goes far away from green.

Liberals have no objective basis for morality. They don’t have a leg on which to stand.

Liberals think that mankind is basically good. They do not understand the true nature of man.

Liberals believe anything goes (except for biblical values) and that is just what is happening as America goes down the drain.


Do As I Say (Not As I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy exposes liberals for what they really are—hypocrites. When asked about conservative hypocrisy, the author answered, “Yes, we are all hypocrites and I talk about that in the book. But liberal hypocrisy and conservative hypocrisy are quite different on two accounts. First, you hear about conservative hypocrisy all the time. A pro-family congressman caught in an extramarital affair, a minister caught in the same. This stuff is exposed by the mudslinging media all the time. The leaders of the liberal-Left get a complete pass on their hypocrisy. Second, and this is even more important, the consequences of liberal hypocrisy are different than for the conservative variety. When conservatives abandon their principles and become hypocrites, they end up hurting themselves and their families. Conservative principles are like guard rails on a winding road. They are irritating but fundamentally good for you. Liberal hypocrisy is the opposite. When the liberal-left abandon their principles and become hypocrites, they actually improve their lives. Their kids end up in better schools, they have more money, and their families are more content. Their ideas are truly that bad.”

Talking to liberals about morals and logic is like trying to tell a toddler about academics and aesthetics. A liberal, who is also a devout Free Mason, told me he does not go to church because he didn’t want to be around all of the hypocrites yet he faithfully ran a booth at a popular Flea Market every weekend and happily peddled his product to those hypocrites that arrive after they leave church

Liberals have the opinion that they are open-minded, but in reality they are closed-minded bigots. Examples of Intolerant Liberalism are easy to find. Liberals like to make up false slurs, like Islamophobia and homophobia, to mask their Christophobia. Christianophobia is real and Christianphobes “do not tend to think that they are intolerant. Usually those who do not like blacks or Muslims admit that they are intolerant but simply try to justify their intolerance. Those with Christianophobia tend to deny that they are intolerant but rather that they are fairly interpreting social reality. Envisioning themselves as fair and free of intolerance allows them to blame those they detest rather than recognize how their emotions have distorted their intellectual judgments,” report sociologists David Williamson and George Yancey in their book So Many Christians, So Few Lions: Is There Christianophobia in the United States?. A brilliant conservative lady says that rather than Christianaphobia, the “phenomenon emerging among the educated left-wing classes is better dubbed theomisia, or the hatred of God, and by extension God-lovers.” Both terms describe the hate in the hearts of liberals. (8)

Liberal hearts are evil. Here are some things they say they'd like to do to conservative Christians: >“I want them all to die in a fire,” said one man with a doctorate. “I would be in favor of establishing a state for them. . . . If not then sterilize them so they can’t breed more,” said a middle aged man with a master’s degree. “The only good Christian is a dead Christian,” said another under-45-year-old man with a doctorate. “I abhor them and I wish we could do away with them,” said a middle-aged woman with a master’s degree. “A tortuous death would be too good for them,” said a college-educated man between the ages of 36 and 45. “They should be eradicated without hesitation or remorse,” said an elderly woman with a master’s degree… (Many) could think of many laws they wished to pass, from stripping churches of tax exemptions, to banning homeschooling. “Restrict their ability to become judges, senators, representatives, member of Cabinet, military chief of staff and other powerful members of government,” said a man over 75 with a bachelor’s degree… “Churches should not be allowed to provide orphanages and adoption programs,” said one elderly man with a doctorate. “I think we should restrict the indoctrination of children in religious dogma and ritual” said a middle-aged man with a master’s degree. Conservative Christians should “not be allowed to hold political office, be police etc… (J)udges and powerful politicians from San Francisco to D.C. are now acting on these ugly impulses.< Supposedly this is only a little over a third of them. However, it is likely the same as Muslims where most do not do the killing, but approve of it.

I found out just how open-minded liberals are when I teamed with some other military veterans (That’s me on the right with the “Once we have a war…” sign.) to oppose the 2004 presidential candidacy of the traitor John Kerry. It was personal, not political, with us--the group was formed by me, a life-long Independent, and a friend, a life-long Democrat. The first time we appeared, on a public sidewalk, outside of a John Edwards event, we were cursed and even nearly run over by a swerving SUV. Several times, union thugs hassled us by attempting to block our signs from view. Our group was (although quite unique and newsworthy) ignored by nearly all of the news media (actually all of the print media).

The Huffington Post should be renamed Hypocrisy Post. It claims to operate from an open-minded foundation, but my comments have been censored. Huffington, huffed and puffed and couldn’t stand the heat of a different worldview--mine.

Liberals are always griping about “censorship”. It’s funny they want to censor my book Protester Voices—the 1974 Textbook Tea Party.

The liberal Charleston Gazette has published several (not all I submitted) of my articles. The Gazette editors are in a dilemma. If they refuse my pieces it is obvious censorship. Therefore, they likely pray that my opinions will generate little support and much criticism. I have to be a little cynical about the Gazette motives when I am limited to 500 words yet a liberal, who gets as much (if not more) opportunities to opine, had an anti-Christian/conservative piece that had over one thousand words. That is logical to me only if I try to think like a liberal.

It should be noted that the Gazette has never hesitated to mock Christians, but will not do the same with Muslims.

The atheist Gazette editor (as of 2015) has steadfast faith that life will arise from non-life. He fantasizes that living things are evolving when all he sees (and anyone has ever seen) is that all things are devolving. In his fairy-tale world, he imagines that Bible-believing Christians (i.e. fundamentalists) should become perfect (even sprout wings and wear a halo). He thinks it is atrocious that American military killed thousands of mostly combatants in Afghanistan, yet he has no qualms about the millions of innocent babies that are slaughtered in America. If thinking like that is called logical it must have a prefix. How about loony-logic?

Liberals love certain religions. In 2011 I contacted the Kanawha County Public Library regarding its avid promotion of “Yoga for Kids.” I pointed out the religious foundation of yoga and closed with “I see no problem with an adult lecture format about yoga or any religion. To entice children into a stealth religion is wrong. The St. Albans branch has a program titled “Healthy Camp Challenge” which seems to be a non-religious program that would be beneficial to the well-being of children. I suggest that program replace the religion of yoga program.”

I got the usual liberal righteous rationalization to which I replied: "You indicate that this has been a practice of the KCPL since 2007 'because there is interest in it.' Also, you stated that the program is 'completely voluntary, and parents must give permission and be present.' I wonder if permission would be granted if the library disclosed that yoga is a religious aspect of Hinduism. I urge you to make that clear on the form. On KCPL shelves there is ample documentation that yoga is closely connected to Hinduism. Of course, some parents don’t care, but there are likely many who are unaware."

“Now, since I assume that the KCPL does not want to be guilty of establishment of a particular religion, I will provide information about programs that would be widely popular with patrons of every branch. These programs are connected to the Christian religion, but the presenters would make sure that their program is not like a church service. Of course, unlike the yoga evangelists, these men would not use subterfuge.” To my knowledge the KCPL has never allowed a token appearance from those men.

Liberal religion is rampant in “public” schools including the buckle of the Bible Belt.

Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed,The Many Faces of Science Censorship”, and Slaughter of the Dissidents: The Shocking Truth about Killing the Careers of Darwin Doubters are great examples of liberal censorship.

Liberals are not about the free flow of ideas.


The ace of liberalism, the ACLU, is frighteningly fiendish. The power that evil organization wields is sickening. I can think of some accurate labels for the “L”. "Liars" would be a good one. In 2006 I wrote to the ACLU-WV asking for assistance in seeking appropriate legal remedy regarding the promotion of New Age/Eastern mysticism religion of Yoga in Kanawha County schools. I offered to provide references which disclose the religious nature of Yoga.

The ACLU was informed that the argument that Yoga is used only for "relaxation, exercise, and self-confidence" is without merit. If the ACLU allows that argument to prevail then the ACLU should allow creationism to be taught as long as it's for scientific purposes (no Bible or God references) and because it broadens the horizons and increases the cognitive processes of students. I asked, “Although I think there is no such thing--would the ACLU allow the so-called "Christian Yoga" to be used?” Of course, the ACLU rejected my request.

The ACLU website lies when it says “public schools themselves should not be in the business of promoting particular religious beliefs or religious activities.”

In 2008 the problem was worse and I tried again. After another rejection, via a form letter, I wrote: “Since your form letter did not provide a date of my request, nor a restatement of my request, I shall not bother you with restating it here…I must conclude that the ACLU actually approves of the objectionable activity I brought to your attention. Shame, shame on the ACLU." The ACLU knows no such thing as shame. (See my research on yoga.)

The ACLU website brags about its crusade against (the Christian) religion in West Virginia schools. Here are some things the local ACLU brags about on its website: In 20006 they forced the removal of a “portrait” of Jesus from a high. In 2002 they forced a school district to end its graduation prayer policy. In 1999 they caused a county school system to remove the Ten Commandments from being posted. Someone correctly coined the term “Anti Christian Liberty Union”.

REAL hate groups are liberal.


Are Liberals more generous than Conservatives? Not according to the 2004 "Generosity Index" published by the Catalogue for Philanthropy. Conservatives are the most compassionate.

"It turns out that this idea that liberals give more…is a myth… Religious people are more likely to give to charity, and when they give, they give more money: four times as much.” The article is devastating to liberals. Conservatives even donate more blood!

A couple of years later another report disclosed that “Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household.”


I have always said that liberals are more dangerous to America than are terrorists. Now, I say that a serious concern of Americans should be compromising conservatives—especially members of the clergy. Compromising conservatives in leadership positions are leading citizen lemmings to a loss in the political battles they place above rescuing their children! (See below.) The most debilitating danger to America is pathetic pantywaist pastors.

Compromising conservatives (the “muddled middle”) are more lethal to traditional American values than loony liberals. Once they are recognized liberals do their damage swiftly and you can see it coming. Compromising conservatives cause societal decay slowly and with (perhaps unintentional—but just as deadly) stealth. They deserve a prominent place of disgrace. FOX News is the “fox in the hen house.” Besides supporting evolutionism, FOX has prominent personalities that pull their punches—or worse. I heard Sean Hannity arguing with a caller who wanted to call liberals "enemies." The caller was correct.

BObama and the Demoncrats drew a line and the Gutless Old Party would not cross it. In 2015 the GOP again mooned its conservative base. Conservatives had to choose whether to kiss it or kick it. History shows how many times they chose the former. The Contract with America was really a CON-tract that continued the slide (a little slower) to ruin for America.

Conservatives, to the Republican Party, are like battered women who keep coming back for a beating thinking it was an accident and the brute really loves them. Democrats and Republicans are two wings of a bird flying the WRONG way! Another way of describing the two political parties is that they are opposite sides of a two-headed (better yet “two-tailed) coin. “Bipartisan” is only used by Demoncrats when they don’t have power and Republicrites when they do have power. The Gutless Old Party needs to be allowed to become a 2nd or 3rd level party, or more accurately admit it is a wing of the Demoncrats.  Conservatives keep grabbing GOP crumbs when we should be growing our own wheat and baking our own bread.

Although, to simplify communication, I call myself a conservative, I am no longer a conservative. I am a CHRISTIAN.  Where conservative and Constitutional concepts match with that--they are OK.  I am NOT a conservative or a Constitutionalist. I am a CHRISTIAN as in BORN AGAIN.

A biblical worldview is defined as "believing that absolute moral truth exists; the Bible is totally accurate in all of the principles it teaches; Satan is considered to be a real being or force, not merely symbolic; a person cannot earn their way into Heaven by trying to be good or do good works; Jesus Christ lived a sinless life on earth; and God is the all-knowing, all-powerful creator of the world who still rules the universe today...A worldview serves as a person’s decision-making filter, enabling them to make sense of the complex and huge amount of information, experiences, relationships and opportunities they face in life. By helping to clarify what a person believes to be important, true and desirable, a worldview has a dramatic influence on a person’s choices in any given situation.”

That worldview collides with the worldview of liberalism and conflicts with some of conservatism.


Like any garbage, there can be found some useful items. We should keep that in mind when we listen to conservative talk radio.

Rush Limbaugh said that to “recapture the country” conservatives “are going to have to recapture the public education of this country.” Notice he said "recapture", not "abandon". The system will never be recaptured because we never really owned it. It was built upon sewer sand and only had a token and temporary Tidy Bowl. Limbaugh will never call for the obvious need to have a mass exodus from government indoctrination centers.

The conservative Heritage Foundation is ashamed of its roots in the Great Textbook War. Other groups, including the Tea Party, just do not get it. Contemporary conservatives are likely going to lose because they will make mistakes that the Courageous Corps of ‘74 experience could prevent. More importantly, they continue to let the enemy educate their children! That is beyond foolish!! It is one reason I quit being a conservative.

Many Christians think the multiple-married misled-Methodist Rush Limbaugh is near sainthood. The guy is a talented conservative, but (from what I can see) he is ashamed of the Gospel. He is just another Bug in my Ear. Speaking of Talk Show hosts, Neal Boortz (no longer on the air), the epitome of an Episcopalian, is a baby killing evolutionist (due to his libertarian leanings). Sean Hannity is a confused Catholic. Glenn Beck is a lost Later Day Saint. Michael Savage has ravaged his Jewish heritage. Lovely Laura Ingram, is another compromised Catholic who seeks to salvage the Republicrite Party. She is a good old GOP gal. All of them counsel conservatives, but may God have mercy if we put too much stock in the leadership of those misled men. (Boycott Boortz, Flush Rush, Suspect Beck, Bandage Savage, Handle Hannity Carefully, and leave Laura.) Mark Levin, a lawyer, is likely the most laudable and may lead the lost league, along with Phil Valentine, toward victory if they choose to claim Christ. (Beck is the most dangerous of all. He mixes god talk, kumbaya, and New Age doctrine with his conservative politics.)

The Tom Roten Show is the best talk radio anywhere.


Conservatives have dealt with liberalism as ladies and gentlemen even though liberals are viscous thugs. We have turned the other cheek so many times that both cheeks are bloodied. If the analogy of conservatives as parents and America as their child, then liberals are child rapists and child murderers. Liberals are close to destroying America educationally, morally, spiritually, religiously, racially, economically, and militarily. Liberals have lessened domestic tranquility and peace by their put-downs of the police. Because of liberalism America is weakening and Islam is waiting. We need to call liberals what they are—the ENEMY!

Liberals are more dangerous to America than are terrorists or communists because liberals rot the fabric of society. Liberals have poured their ludicrous lies upon the soil of history and made a muddy mess. We should gleefully grab handfuls of the mud and sling it upon the liberals’ robs of self-righteousness. Those in touch with reality must belittle the beliefs of liberals.

Liberals support social positions that are harmful to human dignity such as welfare without work (excluding those few who really are incapable of doing something--even picking up trash in their neighborhood).

I have seen the devastation caused by alcohol. I doubt if it is much less, if any, than drugs. Wikipedia reports, that appeal of the 18th amendment was based upon "Prohibition became increasingly unpopular during the Great Depression, as the repeal movement, led by conservative Democrats and Catholics, emphasized that repeal would generate enormous sums of much needed tax revenue, and weaken the base of organized crime." Call that " COMPROMISE ." Now we see a repeat with recreation marijuana. Medicine, general science, and even the government know marijuana use is dangerous.

America’s first modern Tea Party sounded the alarm. In 1974 a group of West Virginians sounded the alarm, "THE LIBERALS ARE COMING!" The Corps of ’74 will echo for evermore! The first modern Tea Partiers proved that conservatives cannot compromise with liberals because liberals are liars. Compromise leads to confusion which ends in collapse.

There is no negotiating with liberals! Any so-called compromise they agree to will only be a delaying tactic (actually a small liberal battle victory) until they can find a way to win the war. Compromise for conservatives puts them into the liberal pot (like the proverbial frog) where they are slowly cooked.

John D. Morris pointed out that Christian living is more than just turning the other cheek for continued smacks. “Scripture frequently refers to the Christian life and work in athletic or combative terms. When all things are considered, reason compels the Christian to enter into the race and fight. 'Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life, whereunto thou art also called, and hast professed a good profession before many witnesses.' (1 Timothy 6:12)… (W)e are well-armed and protected. The 'whole armour of God' includes the girdle of 'truth,' the 'breastplate of righteousness,' shoes of 'the preparation of the gospel of peace,' 'the shield of faith,' 'the helmet of salvation,' and 'the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God' (Ephesians 6:13-17). The warrior’s mouth is filled with prayers and bold speech (vv.18-20); his sword has no scabbard, and his back has no armor, for retreat is unthinkable.”

We win by Bible based ballots, not bullets; and by Spirit-led sanity, not swords.

Liberals and their God hating allies understand where the battle rages. If we keep our children in public schools we are going to produce more liberals. We are in a war for the hearts, minds, and souls of the precious children of America.  No sane military force sends raw recruits to be trained (and mentally maimed) in the boot-camp of the bad guys.  "Call to Dunkirk" reveals the situation we are in. The first step to victory (if the Lord delays) is to Rescue the Children!

We should never try to “take back” public (government) schools. They were never Christian and only appeared neutral until society sank so low that the true school foundation was revealed. Trying to remove Common Core is a waste of valuable time and effort. Common Core, at best, will only be renamed.  For the sake of discussion, if it could be removed, our children should not be in pagan schools.  Fighting sex-ed or whatever demonic activity arises is also futile. Whatever victories gained will need to be monitored beyond the capacity of hundreds of volunteers. Conservatives will cloud the matter by pushing Charter Schools/School Choice which are NOT the solution. Those conservative cons are simply a government education variation, or as someone said, “The same dog on a longer leash.” The teacher unions and their allies, such as the ACLU, own government schools. They will quickly take back any lost ground and they will not hesitate to do it in an under-handed manner while your group operates honestly and ethically. 

I proved that government schools are irredeemable. No matter how many political gains or wins are made it will all be for naught if we leave our children in government schools.

With technology we already have the means for any willing family to educate their children through the highest levels of math and science.  There are a small minority of people who are in serious need of help. Biblically obedient churches can carry the load. If the parents who were able would be obedient to God (and give up their government "ed" welfare) we could end government schools.

In 2015 Noreen O’Brien pointed out that “(T)he Youth Misery Index (yes, there really is such a thing) is the worst it’s ever been… But the kids of today need not worry because the left is on the case ready to right the world’s wrongs…Liberals will use any means to control children... If the school board can’t scare parents into putting their children back into state run insane asylums, have the state do it for you. Find out something about the parents, anything, and use it as a pretense to steal their kids.”  

As Christians advance in removing children from government schools, liberals will do what they did to the 1974 Textbook Protesters.  There are three levels of attack.

1. Deceive:  The opposition will have infiltrators unite with us in order to gather information.
2. Distract:  The opposition will attempt to cause confusion and even commit acts to discredit us.
3. Destroy:  The opposition will not hesitate to hurt us in whatever way they can.  A great leader opposing the liberal agenda, Great Textbook War leader Marvin Horan, is a prime example.

The United States is being destroyed from within. (7) It is like a huge oak tree that is infested with insects.  For years it looks healthy and then signs of decay start.  Eventually the little pests destroy the oak. It is imperative that we apply a treatment to counteract the infestation!


We must obey the Bible. Jesus said, “Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which spitefully use you, and persecute you.” (Matthew 5:44) However, Jesus never hesitated to offend people with the truth. He was especially harsh with high-brow religionists, saying to some, “ Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?” (Matthew 23:33) Jesus despised their sin and was angered at how they caused others to stumble. He called them hypocrites, blind leaders of the blind, fools, liars, whited sepulchers (whitewashed tombs), and said they were of their father the devil. (6) Jesus still loved them so much that He died for their sin. As we lampoon liberalism, we must do so with respect for the liberal, but not masking our ridicule of liberalism. It is similar to “love the sinner, but hate the sin”. We have concern for the liberal, but contempt for liberalism. Even for close friends “The truth is, love and acceptance are not the same thing. The even bigger truth is that love is messy and hard, while acceptance is clean and easy. Love says, ‘Your actions are hurting you. And because I love you, I am going to hold you accountable.’" It is like intervening with a family member who is a drug addict. Tough love is true love.

One way of praying for evil people is provided in scripture. “I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men… For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all… (I Timothy 2:1, 5-6a) To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God… (Acts 26:18a) And that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will.” (II Timothy 2:26)

Another way to pray for evil people is also provided in scripture. “Destroy thou them, O God; let them fall by their own counsels; cast them out in the multitude of their transgressions; for they have rebelled against thee. (Psalms 5:10) Give them according to their deeds, and according to the wickedness of their endeavours: give them after the work of their hands; render to them their desert.” (Psalms 28:4)

Revenge and punishment belongs to God. “Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.” (Romans 12:19b) Although “The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed…” (Psalms 2:2) Ultimately “He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision [a state of being laughed at or ridiculed: a state of being derided-- to say that (someone or something) is ridiculous or has no value]”. (Psalms 2:4)

Knowing we will win is good. Winning souls is great.


I do not support the hate of any individuals or groups. Telling the truth about individuals or groups is an act of love. Hating their teaching is a separate issue. As Christ commands, we are to love liberals as individuals--but He does not expect us to love what they do and teach, especially when they ruin the lives of innocent children. We must not tolerate liberalism. We must strive to eliminate the influence of that damnable doctrine. Christ said it would be better for those that offend children to have a millstone around their neck and they be cast into the sea. (Matthew 18:6; Mark 9:42; Luke 17:2) That is a pretty strong statement.

Getting saved is the solution for liberals. If they reject that free choice then they commit themselves to serving the god of this world. As Christians, we are called to resist that god and his servants. Ephesians 6:12 says, “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”

Liberals, as Satan’s servants, may appear to be wise and wonderful people for their master, "The Devil, Satan", was created as “the most beautiful and most intelligent being in all the universe… the most beautiful and most intelligent being that God ever created… the arch-deceiver, the arch-liar. (As) the most intelligent being of God’s entire creation... (Satan) has been so subtle in his lies and deception that he has fooled the entire population of earth, the actors in this theater of the universe. (Satan) is the perfect example of pride, greed, arrogance, and self-seeking ambition...'And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.'” (2 Corinthians 11:14-15)

I cannot say what awaits liberals any better than what God put in the Bible. “For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,  And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:  And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.”  (Romans 1:17-32)

America MUST turn from her wicked liberal ways!

Christian fundamentalist Bible believers know that “A review of the messages of the Old Testament prophets to a wayward nation of Israel finds a striking parallel between this 'post Christian' America and paganized Israel. Remember: without righteousness, America is doomed. Do not think that a political move can free us from the need for a revival. Righteousness is what exalts a nation, not any political position. Legalizing sins such as abortion, adultery, and sodomy brings God’s reproach, lifted only by repentance. (Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people. Proverbs. 14:34)… America’s slide into paganism is not limited to any election period, but began many decades ago when godless humanists were allowed into our schools, colleges and even some churches. God told Israel in 2 Chronicles 7:14 that if His people humbled themselves, prayed and turned from their wicked ways, He would heal their land. For too long, God’s people have slept through the paganizing of America. Now, it is up to us to obey this verse and hope that He will bring the promised healing.”

Out of love, let’s share the Gospel with liberals and then demolish the demonic worldview of liberalism because liberalism is EVIL.




Pieces of this article popped into my head over several years and finally the impetus to git ‘er done came after reading Doug Giles’ “Resolve for 2015: Get More Aggressive Making Fun of Progressives” article.



“The Left always accuses the Right of what they themselves are doing. Even a cursory review of history would reveal that it is the Democrats/Liberals/Progressives/Socialists (including Communists)/Next Name to Protect the Guilty (DLPSN) that use the tactics of the worst Communist regimes and the Nazis. Heard of the "Brown Shirts?" How are the DLPSN mobs any different? Considering how far the DLPSN has gone already it is scary to contemplate if they will follow their mentors into even worse behavior.” Comment under an article about “The Big Lie” by Dinesh D’Souza .  
Gone are the days of intellectual liberalism, replaced, sadly, with social justice warrior illiberalism that traffics exclusively in immutable characteristics and perceived sociological privileges and disadvantages…Because progressives can’t win in the marketplace of ideas, they resort to shutting down debate and shaming via shrieking pejoratives. They employ the same strategy over and over again: declare conservative beliefs outside the realm of acceptable political discourse, then identify them personally as people of bad character.  Rather than refute conservative arguments or acknowledge that a diverse American people can often have a diverse set of ideas, the Left uses dehumanizing rhetoric to shame and bully in an effort to force everyday people to disassociate from those the Left wants to destroy. This strategy is anti-free speech and, frankly, anti-American.”
Liberals are like a Jerry Springer audience and Antifa are like Springer guests.  Karl Priest
(P)rogressives claim to be obsessed with scientific data, but promptly abandon it when it no longer suits their agenda. Academics who point out that there is no scientific basis for the current transgender craze are thus shunned as hateful transphobes. Climate change models are thus impeccable evidence that we must restructure the global economy, but the ironclad scientific consensus indicating when life begins in the womb must be ignored. Even ultrasounds, embryoscopy footage, and medical textbooks are not enough to make progressives consider the ethics of abortion…”  
(A liberal says) “ The real solution to all of the violence in the world, she insists, is “no barriers, no borders, we all just need to co-exist.”… But obviously it’s the rank hypocrisy of the coexist brigade that jumps out at you most of all. And I’m not even talking about the hypocrisy of hearing a sermon about “unity” and “love” from a (a liberal) who couldn’t manage to stay married for longer than 14 months. If you’re going to unite with the whole world, whatever that means, it seems logical to begin by uniting with your own family. If you haven’t yet mastered that process, it’s probably best to leave the problem of worldwide unity to someone else…Of course, the most egregious hypocrisy is in the bit about “borders and barriers,” which are the two things left wing celebrities always point to as the cause of all misery and strife on the planet. Yet (the liberal) scolds us for our “borders and barriers” from the security of her private estate, protected around the clock by walls and gates and a security detail.
“There is no form of legal authority that the left accepts as a permanent institution. It only utilizes forms of authority selectively when it controls them. But when government officials refuse the orders of the duly elected government because their allegiance is to an ideology whose agenda is in conflict with the President and Congress, that’s not activism, protest, politics or civil disobedience; it’s treason…The left is an authoritarian movement that wants total compliance with its dictates with severe punishments for those who disobey…The left is a treasonous movement.”
(L)iberals, on some level of consciousness, feel guilty about not being voluntarily charitable. Therefore, to write off their guilt, they outsource their “generosity” to the government by voting for wealth re-distributive policies.
The left and their backers often argue their case by resurrecting parts of their closetful of smear paint, including the vilification of anyone who disagrees with them…The Ku Klux Klan was created by Democrats to protect Democrats in the Old South, where for more than 100 years the KKK way of settling an argument was often by imposing fear and death…Maybe we need a weeping wall for the overly self-righteous.
Leftists don’t merely disagree with you. They don’t merely feel you are misguided. They don’t think you are merely wrong. They hate you. They want you enslaved and obedient, if not dead…They   hate  you, because by defying them you have prevented them from living up to the dictates of their false religion…Their sick faith gives meaning to these secular weirdos, giving them something that fills their empty lives with a messianic fervor to go out and conquer and convert the heathens…Oh, there are different leftist sects. There are the social justice warriors who have manufactured a bizarre mythology and scripture of oppression, privilege, and intersectionality…Then there are the pagan weather religion oddballs convinced that the end is near…Then there are the ones who simply worship themselves, the elitists who believe that all wisdom and morality has been invested in them…But all the leftist sects agree – they have found the revealed truth…They are fanatics, and by not surrendering, by not kneeling, and by not obeying, you have committed an unpardonable sin…They will take your job, slander your name, even beat or kill you – whatever it takes to break you and terrify others by making you an example.   
The enemies of civilization in America figured out long ago that they could control debates by controlling language. In order to avoid the smear of “extremism” and to get along, most people reflexively adopt the new terms. You know, turning homosexuality into “gay,” abortion into “choice,” gambling into “gaming,” smut into “erotica” and government spending into “investments.”… Now onto moral anarchy. It’s the logical destination for a culture where words no longer mean what people know they mean and truth itself is abandoned.
“Liberals Claim that anyone who disagrees with them is some combination of Racist, Sexist, Bigoted, Homophobic. (Liberals are) f ixated on fantasies (and) unwilling or unable to accept reality, despite irrefutable evidence.” (source unknown) To which I add: Liberals are condescending, hateful, pompous and arrogant hypocrites. (Karl)
“The greatest moral claim of the political left is that they are for the masses in general and the poor in particular. That is also their greatest fraud. It even fools many leftists themselves.”
(Joseph) “Sobran saw the culture war as a full-throated liberal assault on God, reason and American liberty, dressed in the language of “equality,” “fairness” and “tolerance.” He often lamented the church’s unilateral disarmament in many important areas. I can only imagine how he would now describe the cave-in by prominent politicians and the military brass to the “draft women and Klinger for combat” lunacy…When Franklin Roosevelt’s adviser Alger Hiss was caught working for Joseph Stalin, Sobran observed, “nobody asked, ‘How on earth can you be a liberal and a Communist at the same time?’ Why? Because liberalism was the most hospitable camouflage for Communists….At bottom is a fundamental disagreement over human nature…Romans 3:10 declares, “there is not one righteous, no, not one,” and Romans 3:23 says, “all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.”.. Nonsense, say the liberals. Man is essentially good and just needs the right system to evolve toward perfection.”
60 Hard Truths about "Liberals"

The book The Intimidation Game: How the Left Is Silencing Free Speech explains that for every day Americans “only offense, it seems, is caring enough about their country to get involved. But because they don't tow the politically correct line on issues like taxes, healthcare, climate change, and federal spending, they find their activities have been virtually criminalized by limousine liberals trying to weaponize government bureaucracies to use them to silence dissent…(T)he shotgun efforts to silence conservative organizations (is) evidence of a larger push to control the social agenda.
The word "Liberal" was forcibly stolen and corrupted by evil men who intentionally perverted the use and meaning of the word. In the long forgotten past, the word "Liberal" described honorable and principled men who held to a philosophy of government that advocated Constitutional Republicanism. Constitutional Republicanism is a type of government almost unknown to most of the world. America was originally a Constitutional Republic. A Constitutional Republic defined is characterized by a very small government with limits on its powers of taxation and whose other powers are strictly limited by rigorously enforced Constitutional edicts. But modern Liberals are nothing more and nothing less than Communists, Socialists and Dictators. Modern Liberals promote, advocate and enforce the centralization of all political power into an all powerful central government. The honorable old Liberals of the 19th century must be spinning in their graves over the outrageous corruption and modern use of the word "Liberal." BE SURE TO SEE 60 Hard Truths about Liberals!
What Liberals Say

“Every cradle to the grave program they’ve concocted was created to take otherwise independent and free human beings, and turn them into slaves dependent on the state…Ultimately, the left doesn’t like to see government forced to compete with anyone or anything else.” 

"Among progressives there is no room for dissent. There is no tolerance for ideas that aren’t pre-approved by leftist elites. Critical thinking need not be engaged as thought itself is processed by rote social formulas. Clownish caricatures define those identified as victim and villain. Victim, villain, and “the expert”, are the categories applied to everyone. Hypersensitivity is a lifestyle…Today’s left instead employs the expert to provide marching orders. The expert is never impartial; always a well credentialed progressive. Expertise isn’t dependent upon accomplishment. The expert’s dexterity when it comes to manipulating rhetoric and emotion is key. “Expert” is synonymous with “community organizer” or “activist”. In this person the confluence of progressive agenda, rhetoric, and emotion produces results that are increasingly familiar…When demands aren’t met, a cesspool of politically charged rage is allowed to percolate and occasionally erupt in violent outbursts. When demands are met they only serve as precedents with which to pursue ever more radical objectives."  
“Liberals/Socialists/ Progressives/ Communists lie to get their way. They believe in ends justifying the means so they lie, and lie and lie.”
) "want to believe what they believe, and they are infuriated when others express different views in their presence. They buy into a narrative, expertly presented by most of the nation’s leading media organizations, and they can’t bear any deconstruction of that narrative. Their opponents are not wrong; they are misogynistic, anti-whatever, knuckle-dragging, hate-filled racists. They cling to words such as compromise and understanding, but they search for neither. What they call compromise actually amounts to capitulation. What they call understanding amounts to the same thing."
“The author of The KinderGarden of Eden: How the Modern Liberal Thinks was inspired to write his book because he “had been presenting my understanding of how the Modern Liberal thinks – and why that thinking leads him to side invariably and, in fact, inevitably with all that is evil, failed and wrong.” His book states that the modern liberal is “both morally and intellectually retarded at the level of the five-year old child.” He says, “Not only is the Modern Liberal bigoted, but his mindless prejudices are invariably against all that is good, right and successful. Hear the author poke fun at liberalism.”
With great humor Dennis Prager lists the Top 10 Ways Liberalism Makes America Worse .
The progressive left has been in a death struggle
with religion, the family, capitalism and morality itself since becoming a political and philosophical force during the French Revolution…Revolutionaries such as John Dewey, Margaret Mead, Margaret Sanger, Herbert Marcuse and Wilhelm Reich, all of whom waxed poetically about the Soviet Union, inspired progressive educational and social policies that weakened support for organized religion, marital fidelity and the family while empowering the state.
(L)iberalism is becoming downright pathological. The disease is progressive (in more ways than one). Precursors were visible as far back as 1964, and again in the 1980s…The chief symptom of liberal distress is an intense form of denial. Liberals now actually deny that conservatives exist. There are, of course, strange, cartoon-like images that liberals call conservative, yet these bear little resemblance to complex conservative human beings with thoughts capable of posing a reasoned challenge to liberal convictions. In psychiatric terms, liberals have split off an all-bad version of conservatism in an effort to defend against the intolerable reality of actual threats to the liberal point of view. I don’t think this denial has quite reached the level of psychosis. Perhaps we could call it high-functioning borderline instead. At any rate, we are now clearly in the realm of pathology.”

QUESTIONS: That You Should Ask Every Single Hypocritical Liberal (out of 20): “If there is a 'separation between the church and state', why has the government spent so much money on a religious leader’s (Pope’s) visit? If the U.S. Supreme Court were to rule that it is 'legal' for men to have sex with young boys, would it be legal? If homosexuals are 'born that way', how about pedophiles, bi-sexuals, and bigots?"

“Liberals show tremendous compassion in pushing for generous government spending to help the neediest people at home and abroad. Yet, when it comes to individual contributions to charitable causes, liberals are cheapskates . Arthur Brooks, the author of a book on donors to charity, Who Really Cares, cites data that households headed by conservatives give 30 percent more to charity than households headed by liberals. A study by Google found an even greater disproportion: Average annual contributions reported by conservatives were almost double those of liberals.”
People in Blue States seek psychiatric help 50% more often than in Red States… People who live in liberal states search for psychologists on Google 50% more , per capita, than people from conservative states… Liberals suffer from: 1) Phobias, such as fears that they are destroying the Earth (when in reality, they are only destroying America) 2) Guilt, for being white or male or having a job or earning money 3) Unhappiness with their bodies or sexuality, due to schizophrenia or gender identity disorder 4) Greed and envy, towards other people's property 5) Anger towards people of different genders or races and so on.”
The Progressive believes in precisely two things:  his own magnificence and the constructive power of brute force.  In combination, they lead him naturally from the role of pestiferous busybody to brutal dictator…(T)he Progressive rationalizes his desire to rule as a concern for human welfare, seeing himself as a great humanitarian, far superior morally to the lesser beings….  What specifically the Progressive attempts to control depends on his personal inclinations and just how far he senses he can push the general public.  Any weakness or lack of determination by the average citizen in resisting the nascent tyrant encourages him to push even further, whereas a determined resistance will often convince him to micro-manage some other aspect of our lives until a more propitious moment arrives to advance his original plan.  But in no case is the Progressive held back by any trace of self-restraint.”
See this site: Liberal Logic 101
Liberals make rules that they don’t follow. Those are for the masses. But when they want something that the majority of voters don’t want, they’ll break every rule in the book to get ‘er done .”
“While I do not want to apply a general stereotype on everyone who identifies as a liberal , since everyone has varying opinions, it is hard to not notice that many vocal critics of religion and patriotism need to pressure others to support their opinions. This need to force others to change their beliefs is rooted in low self-esteem, as well as doubts that the instigator has about his or her opinions and choices. Therefore, there is a need to see external reinforcement of their opinions, even if that support is involuntary; the most prevalent example is forcing Christian bakers to decorate cakes with homosexual overtones.

A Guide to the Political Left
(lots of resources)
“If there is a part of America that’s important or works, liberals are systematically trying to destroy it… As a rule, liberals support stupid, counter-productive policies that do more harm than good to the country. This is what I mean by saying that they’re “mainstreaming dumb.” However, we’ve now gotten to the point where liberals are “mainstreaming crazy.”…(L) iberals are now demanding that all of society cater to other people’s mental illnesses.”

(T)he left didn’t always mean some of the ideals it used to pronounce for itself, or at least it didn’t mean them in the high-minded, principled way they sounded. The left had the reputation of being defenders of free speech, for example, but it was always something of a case of “free speech for me but not for thee.” They were all in favor of “questioning authority”—until they became the authorities. Here is a small list I’ve been keeping of the liberal pieties that now only seem to be believed by people on the right.

To study the differences of liberalism and progressivism start at:

Progressivism 101: The differences between progressivism and liberalism

What are ‘Liberals,’ What are ‘Progressives,’ and Why the Difference Matters

Progressivism and Liberalism

Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change

The Pity Party: A Mean-Spirited Diatribe Against Liberal Compassion

Godless: The Church of Liberalism

The Most Dangerous Cult

Scarlet Letters: The Ever-Increasing Intolerance of the Cult of Liberalism

Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left Has Sabotaged Family and Marriage  

Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild (Hear her speech. This is WORTH THE WATCH!
Substitute “liberals” for “leftists” and the article "BACKWARDS: Violent Leftists Increase Demonization of Right" does not change.

“The term “ultra-leftist” simply describes a liberal who understands liberalism and is unashamedly and actively devoted to forcing that worldview.
Professor Walter E. Williams points out that leftists, progressives, socialists, communists and fascists can be compared to “mass murderers such as Hitler, Stalin and Mao Tse-tung” because when Hitler, Stalin and Mao were campaigning for political power, you can bet they didn't campaign on the promise to murder millions of their own people.”
There is not much difference between a Socialist, Marxist and a Democrat.
Liberalism is not limited to pale skin pigmentation. Black conservative Jason L. Riley is an editorial board member and a senior editorial page writer at the Wall Street Journal. He says, “High rates of black violence in the late twentieth century are a matter of historical fact, not bigoted imagination.”… The Left wants to blame these outcomes on racial animus and poverty, but back in the 1940s and ’50s, when racial discrimination was legal and black poverty was much higher than today, the black crime rate was lower. The Left wants to blame these outcomes on “the system,” but blacks have long been part of running that system… Liberal elites would have us deny what black ghetto residents know to be the truth. These communities aren’t dangerous because of racist cops or judges or sentencing guidelines. They’re dangerous mainly due to black criminals preying on black victims… If liberals want to help reverse these crime trends, they would do better to focus less on supposed racial animus and more on ghetto attitudes towards school, work, marriage, and child-rearing… White liberals think they are helping blacks by romanticizing bad behavior. And black liberals are all too happy to hustle guilty whites.” Black folks have more to fear from hook-winking liberals than from hood-wearing Klansmen. Liberal blacks need to face “Racial Reality”.
A term I coined to accurately describe liberals is “levobortomite”: (lev oh bor' tow mite) noun. Anyone who believes and/or promotes left wing extremism, evolutionism, abortion, and/or anti-family activities such as sodomite marriage.  These people are not limited to any particular political party. 

Some descriptions I partially pulled from others of whom I do not recall names:
Democrats (i.e. “liberals”) depend on division, destruction, and demonization.
Learjet, limousine liberals are loony.
Liberalism is a Socially Transmitted Disease infecting the mindless and spread by spineless spiritual leaders.

Libertarians are either lost liberals or confused conservatives. See “A Wolf By Any Name Is Still a Wolf ”.


(Europe and Britain/England changed to “Westerners” and “West”) Most likely, however, the transformation will be effected without major battles. It won’t be a matter of numbers or of military strength, but of strength of belief. Those with the strongest beliefs will prevail. Those who are not sure what to believe will submit without a fight…Many (Westerners) see no sense in resisting Islamizationbecause they have nothing worth defending. To be sure, (Western) leaders still talk about “our values,” but they can’t seem to specify what those values are, beyond appeals to ‘diversity’ and ‘pluralism.’…In an earlier era, (Westerners) would have connected their values to God, country, family, and honor. In other words, things worth fighting for. But ‘liberal, pluralistic values’? That’s not very solid ground on which to take your stand. Who wants to die for diversity? Indeed, it can be argued that the worship of diversity for its own sake is what allowed terrorists to get a foothold in (the West) in the first place…Freedom is a fundamental right, but what you do with your freedom is also important. There has to be some higher objective value that directs our choices to good ends rather than bad ones. Otherwise, freedom becomes a license to do anything one pleases.

Unfortunately, such moral confusion leaves people vulnerable to those who are absolutely certain about their beliefs. The moral relativism of the West is one of the chief reasons why the Islamic cultural jihad has been so successful. People who can’t see that the soft-porn style of Lady Gaga, Miley Cyrus, and Ariana Grande is not good for children will have difficulty seeing the problem with polygamy, child marriage, and other aspects of sharia law. In a relativistic society, the safest default position is ‘who’s to judge?’…

(The West) is being transformed from a Christian culture to an Islamic culture, but that’s not quite accurate because it’s actually a three-stage transformation. Much of (the West) has already transitioned out of its Christian stage and into a post-Christian or secular stage. There are still many Christians in (the West), but (the West’s) Christian consciousness has been largely lost. The next stage is the transition from secularism to Islam…It’s hard to beat transcendent values with transient values. That’s especially the case when the transcendent crowd are willing to die (and kill you in the process) for their values.

As twisted as these values may be, it’s beginning to look as though secular values aren’t up to the job of opposing them. The trouble with secular values when they are cut off from their Judeo-Christian roots is that they are arbitrary. Autonomy? Dignity? Equality? Says who?...Unless, that is, there is a recovery of the Judeo-Christian belief that God is a God of love, justice, reason, and goodness—and that we are made in his image (a concept which does not exist in Islam). In the context of that vision, belief in human dignity and the rights of man is thoroughly justified. People who believe that they and their neighbor are made in the image of God will generally have a strong sense of their responsibility to act accordingly. Such people will be far from perfect, but they will at least realize that it is wrong to submit both to Islam’s warped image of God and to secularism’s degraded image of man.  
When the Leftists and those who finance them can’t get their way in some big city they stage a “peaceful protest” (read that riot) and they destroy property and sometimes lives. This is what the Left always does. They are unable to create anything except mayhem and destruction–but that’s really what they are there for–as a tool of destruction to pave the way so that those who pay them for the destruction will then have a clear path to construct the “New World Order.”
“(A)s a wise neighbor told me years ago about an exceptionally vile person we both knew: "She's more to be pitied than scorned." At the time, this seemed overly charitable to me. But as the decades have elapsed and I've watched progressives consistently acting so infantile, it is clear that their limited repertoire – hurling of insults and obscenities, public temper tantrums, wanton destruction of property, idle threats to leave the country, physical assaults on people who disagree with them, engaging in serial lies of increasing magnitude…”
"The left has become everything it claims to hate and the alt-left has become increasingly obvious about it…They blame conservatives for the very things they do themselves. Liberals are violent, hateful and intolerant. Naturally, they claim conservatives fit those descriptions…They support violence, vandalism and more…The key to the liberal mindset is to remember they hate everything that is normal and want to overturn every single convention -- patriotism, free speech (see above), heterosexuality and more. And they try to push that agenda into every single facet of life -- TV, movies and now, musicals."
Michael Walsh, in The Devil’s Pleasure Palace, “said the left has erected ‘a modern Devil’s Pleasure Palace, a Potemkin village built on the promises of ‘social justice’ and equality for all … a world without want or cold or fear or racism or sexism … a world that sounds very much like heaven,” but, instead, “this world has become hell.’’ Which is “evidenced by, ‘The corpses of the untold millions who have died in the attempts of the literally Unholy Left to found the Kingdom of Heaven here on earth, divorced from God,’ which, he notes, is also the same ambition as Satan’s: to reclaim heaven, but without God.”…He says the “the left and the devil have same aims: destroy the traditional and established order.”…The first target of the left was to “left relentlessly assaulted the traditional family, while insisting other types of family were just as good, the nuclear family was finally jettisoned as the ideal.”
"Most people are either thinkers or feelers. Thinkers tend to be conservatives. Feelers tend to be Democrats. I became a conservative because the Liberal positions I believed in for a long time turned out not to be factually supportable. When I turned to business, I also discovered that liberal positions hurt the people they claim to help. Because most of the far-left liberals approach most things from an emotional standpoint, nothing they say, do, or believe makes sense. They literally do not live in reality, because if they engaged reason and logic, their worldview would collapse. Who likes to be wrong?...In order to maintain their fantasy world, liberals engage in projection as a defense mechanism. All the darkness that is within them gets projected onto conservatives – the proverbial ‘Other’."
“The political Left increasingly uses criminal prosecutions -- or the threat thereof -- as a political cudgel with which to crush differing views.”
In the dedication of his book Rules for Radicals liberal leader Saul Alinsky wrote, “Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history... the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”(emphasis in original)
A liberal Yale Ph.D. realized liberalism was wrong. “After changing intellectual directions his colleagues did not respond with tolerance. They did not give him his intellectual freedom. They did not allow him to hold his own convictions. On the contrary, he was vilified, marginalized, and viewed as an intellectual pariah.”  
Evan Sayet
said he “ was your typical New York City-born, Liberal Jew.  My Liberalism wasn’t a thoughtful embrace of Left-wing ideology – in fact, very, very few people thoughtfully embrace this ideology.”  Mr. Sayet is a stupendous stand-up comedian.
“Former liberal Dennis Prager says, “Though there are many sincere liberals, it is likely that this ability to provide moral cover for a less than moral life is one source of liberalism’s appeal. I first thought about this when I saw how the left-wing students at my graduate school, Columbia University, behaved. Aside from their closing down classes, taking over office buildings, and ransacking professors’ offices, I saw the way in which many of them conducted themselves in their personal lives. Most of them had little sense of personal decency, and lived lives of narcissistic hedonism. Women who were involved with leftist groups have told of how poorly they were treated. And one suspects that they would have been treated far better by conservative, let alone religious, men on campus.”
List of former liberals

“The Plague Of Liberalism is a book that spells out the history and   reasons   for the moral, ethical and mental/emotional health declines in the U.S. in the last 40 years… The author is an ex liberal himself, having been a hippie in San Francisco during the ‘60s and ‘70s…”

"The Left has broken the human will to the point of dependency and, as a result, our lower natures can now be appealed to. Think about that a moment. The Left, in the Darwinist worldview, has attempted to teach us that we are not capable, and that we need someone "enlightened" to govern our daily affairs. As a result, the goals of ideological subversion have been realized; we as a society have lost the will to stand in the face of adversity.  Everything that we are experiencing in America is an all-out assault on the free will of mankind. Our free will is a gift given to us by God."
Noreen O’Brien said (in comments to an article), “I think that when the left says anything we should give them a cold icy look and simply turn away as if they were crazy. I think the right spends way too much time explaining themselves and that makes them look weak. Plus it wastes time and libs know this.”

I responded:

Yes! That is a form of mocking.

Having spent some time over the years mocking evolutionism, I have found that there are a lot of True Believers in Evolutionism (TBEs) that are obsessed with making comments on the Internet. This goes for any subject (political or social) dear to the heart of a liberal. In the case of evolutionism, it is easy to cut to the chase and demand their best proof.

With other subjects, a "cut to the chase" strategy should be developed (for example, abortion could be a sonogram or asking "What is a baby one second before birth?).

The object is to reach the comment readers or, conversation listeners, who have an open and inquiring mind. Sadly, hardcore liberals are willingly ignorant and have hardened hearts. Long debates with them is a waste of precious time.

To which I add: I can publically post this strategy because liberals cannot resist declaring their dogma. Even if they did resist responding it would not matter because they are not the target audience.
There are steps of coming to the rejection of a belief that is wrong. See “Traveling to Truth Transformation.
Former liberals are fantastic leaders. 

“The power of Demagoguery and misleading Media have shaped my views by turning them around 180 degrees. I used to be a LIBERAL. Demonizing your opponent is a demagoguery that is used by people who otherwise have no legitimate argument. Regrettably, it is a tactic that is far too often successful. By making an opponent look like a clown, an extremist, obstructionist and worse of all – A RACIST, one hopes that the legitimate argument is swept away.” -- Howard Galganov

“There is an old adage that goes something like: ‘If you're not a liberal when you're in your 20s you haven't got a heart; if you're not a conservative by the time you're 40 you haven't got a brain.’ It's a reasonable summation of youth's innocence and its desire to save the undertrodden from the seeming unfairness of the world, and of adults' experience and its learned realization that utopia on earth is not an option. I fit that old adage rather nicely, as do millions of others of my generation who were formerly young 1960s liberals bent on saving the world, but who are now middle-aged conservatives and libertarians bent on saving American institutions from the reckless attacks of today's new generation of liberal youth.” -- Dave Duffy

David Horowitz is the icon of liberals who have seen the light. He said, "That is why not only radicals, but even those who call themselves liberals, are instinctively intolerant towards the conservative opposition. For [leftists], the future is not a maze of human uncertainties and unintended consequences. It is a moral choice. To achieve the socially just future requires only that enough people decide to will it. Consequently, it is perfectly consistent for [leftists] to consider themselves morally and intellectually enlightened, while dismissing their opponents as immoral, ignorant, or (not infrequently) insane."

Hear him explain the differences between liberals and conservatives. This is a MUST listen to 4 ½ minutes. Read his articles at Front Page Magazine.

A great confession comes from someone not so well known. “ I’m a recovered Leftist.  I drank the voodoo juice in college. For a time I joined the “ranks of deranged control freaks.  Our professors drilled Marx, Freud and Darwin into our skulls for four year… Leftists assume they are morally and intellectually superior, without a shred of evidence (and frequently contradicting the best evidence).  It is delusional, but necessary.  After all, one must assume supremacy to justify tyranny… Leftists are convinced they possess special knowledge. Leftists simply “know” things... Leftists are prone to misdiagnose problems, given their arrogant presumption…  You will notice as well that Leftists tend to stifle debate by insisting issues are settled... Always angry, irritable and demanding, like menopausal women trying to stop smoking, Leftists never sleep.  They never miss an opportunity to attack, slander, and engage character assassination.  There is no satisfying these people… Leftists tend to be very self-absorbed, and paranoid, immune to all factual information contradicting the narrative… In short, hell hath no fury like a Leftist scorned.  Go ahead.  Scorn one.  See what happens.  Or you can tune in   MSNBC  and watch them go berserk.  Great fun, until you realize the psycho’s really are in control, and thus, the world has become one enormous asylum.”


Liberalism has no limits on lunacy. Liberal lunacy is unlimited. 
A ROTFL cartoon of talking to a liberal
If it was not so funny (as in ROTFL) I would cry. “You may be ‘nocturnalgender’ – a gender that feels more intense during the night, but weak or nonexistent when the light is out. To be ‘orbgender’ is to have a gender which feels round, without any edges. Some are ‘felisgender’ – a small, catlike gender…Then there are those to whom you are attracted – your ‘sexual orientation,’ to use the politically correct term. Of course, those attracted to the opposite sex are heterosexual. But there are those who claim to be ‘ficto’ – individuals who only have feelings towards fictional characters; or ‘objectumsexual’ – someone who is attracted to inanimate objects. If you identify as a clock, you may want someone to address you as tick, ticks, or tickself. Or you might want to go out and find someone who prefers tock, tocks, and tockself.”
A friend emailed me some LOL great points.

It made me think about higher car insurance for high risk individuals (teens).  How about higher health insurance for high risk individuals (homosexuals)?

He wrote, “...just had a funny thought. I'm sure this has occurred to others, but we know that insurance companies have traditionally charged more for teenage boys within a certain age range because of their known statistical likelihood of being more dangerous drivers. They typically get more speeding tickets and other factors that have made this a necessary adjustment for them to base and predict rates.

“It is coming to the point where no one is allowed to disagree that everyone can choose the 'gender' they identify as, and that this can also be fluid. It's essentially a hate crime or sexist to insist on a binary man/woman gender. So, when are they going to come down on insurance companies making such distinctions?

“Should a cat-gender person be allowed to drive since you can't get a license for a cat to drive?

“What about health care- if I identify as an elderly woman can I get certain tax exemptions? If I identify as a 70 yr. old retired oil company CEO can I get my S.S. benefits now?

“If these all sound absurd to law makers or health insurance companies, then why is it allowed that they can pass judgment on the supposed false paradigm of binary gender when we're all required to believe in this growing assortment of identities and associations?

“Seems like we go to the doctor and they are allowed to base the medical truth on the physical truth- they only run tests that are specific to 2 genders and they make you check one box or the other. When are they gonna change?”
Here is a description of young liberals.


> Badly educated. Progressive education...
>Lack of tolerance for views other than their own often misguided doctrine. They are easily brainwashed, so they usually are. Then they seek to censor those who are not likewise brainwashed.
> Taking offence at all ideas, attitudes and thoughts other than their own misguided narrow world view.
>Never having to do what they are told. Bad parenting and bad education mean the first time they have to be obedient is when they get a job.
>Amazing ignorant hypocrisy. They expect to bask in the fruits of capitalism whilst denouncing it continuously.

LOTS more and LOTS of cartoons
“Another reality issue that's extremely annoying to liberals and progressives is chromosomal sex determination. The XX/XY sex determination system is found in humans. Females have two of the same kind of sex chromosome (XX), whereas males have two distinct sex chromosomes (XY). This chromosomal reality is seen as limiting, annoying and an artifact of a patriarchal, chauvinistic society. So liberals and progressives want to change… Somehow liberals and progressives manage to cope with some realities but go ballistic with others. They cope well with black domination of basketball, football and track and with the near absence of black performers in classical concerts. They also accept the complete absence of women in the NFL and NBA.”
Libs Exposed for what they are

I did not coin the quip, but it is true that liberals are a “special kind of stupid.”
If it wasn’t for double standards, some liberals would have none at all… Big Money and Big Business in Politics Are Bad, Unless They Support the Left...Bruce Springsteen and Bryan Adams Get to Follow Their Consciences, but the Baker and Florist Don’t...North Carolina and Mississippi Are Human Rights Violators, but Singapore and Cuba Are Great.”
Self Identity- Coming out as my TRUE self (Be sure to watch this brief video.)
Let’s have a fun farce.

I am coming out. Will you join me?

Like BObama, my thinking has evolved.  Therefore, even though evolution has never been observed, it must be true.

I am ready to proclaim that I am a black-Korean-gay-moderate-Muslim.

Do not let your eyes and reasoning tell you that I am not black!  I think I have some soul deep in my soul.  Besides feeling that My Life Matters, I must have been meant to be born black because I have always felt like I was discriminated against and sneered at.  I should get the benefits of Affirmative Action as a result.  I want a spot on an NBA team. 

I am Korean because I want to eat dog burgers.  That is not as bad as butchering pre-born babies so liberals should honor my diet preference.  However, not all dogs will be on my plate.  There is a cute female collie I have a crush on.  Since the SCOTUS made "the law of the land" that we can marry who we love, I plan to officially (in Kentucky) marry that little lassie.   I will keep my current wife--surely you would have no problem with that.

I now declare that I am gay--just not homosexual.  I will retro the word "gay" to what it meant for hundreds of years :  "Merry; airy; jovial; sportive; frolicksome. It denotes more life and animation than cheerful."  Being "gay" should avail me of a lot of praise from liberals.  Maybe, I'll get a trophy.

Finally, I will be a good moderate Muslim and enjoy my brethren blowing up people and mutilating female genitalia.  Hey, no one is perfect--OK.  Respect my religion!

Will you then join my crusade to mandate that Navy SEAL teams be required to have a number of females equivalent to the male-female national ratio.  Next, we can work on getting a quota for transgenders on the Teams.

Let’s open Planned Puppyhood clinics by the thousands and abort preborn puppies.

A reasonable person sees the idiocy of the farce, but if liberalism is taken seriously, the farce should be accepted and honored.
The American Journal of Political Science  published a correction this year saying that the 2012 paper has “an error” — and that liberal political beliefs, not conservative ones, are actually linked to psychoticism. “The interpretation of the coding of the political attitude items in the descriptive and preliminary analyses portion of the manuscript was exactly reversed,” the journal said in the startling correction.
To be on the cutting edge of the liberal left, you:

>Do not know what is growing inside a woman's tummy until it comes out

>Do not know that a male genitalia on any animal, mammal, human, signifies a male gender and vice versa

>Do not understand that a creation is typically "created' by a creator

>Do not understand that "free" education and healthcare actually cost somebody something

>Tell everyone that it is rich, fat, old, white Christian men that are stealing all the money from you, but resolve every issue by printing hundreds of billions of dollars and using it on programs that only benefit "their" people

>See nothing wrong with a 50 year old man deciding to be a 6 year old girl and being adopted as such, to play with the 8 year old daughter. See nothing hypocritical about that same man going to his job every day as a 50 year old man

>See Islam as a religion of peace while they blow people up daily, but see Christians as top of the terrorist list for wanting to protect babies and calling men and women what they actually are

>Want to legalize every harmful drug every known to cause permanent damage, pretending that medical evidence backs their beliefs, but believe they are experiencing actual harm for having to listen to opposing views on college campuses

>Insist that you are born that way... but you are free to change your mind based on how you feel...

>Global cooling is going to kill ever... Global warming is going to ki... Climate change is going to kill everyone, and it is only the fault of rich white Americans

We know the list goes on, but I wouldn't get anything else done today!
Questions for loony homosexual liberals : “Will government strong arm the Muslim into catering a hog roast? Will the Jewish web designer have to get on board with Will the black seamstress have to hem up robes for short Klansmen? Where does it end? Exposing both the hypocrisy of the left and the looming litigious leviathan that our present madness threatens to unleash, these amount to great questions.”  
For ROTFL videos see Louder with Crowder.
Progressive Disorder
is a term used in United States politics as a pejorative political epithet referring to progressives or leftists."

Liberals are literally idiots.
Jeff Foxworthy:

“If you can get arrested for hunting or fishing without a license, but not for entering and remaining in the country illegally — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.”

“If you have to get your parents’ permission to go on a field trip or to take an aspirin in school, but not to get an abortion — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.”

“If you MUST show your identification to board an airplane, cash a check, buy liquor, or check out a library book and rent a video, but not to vote for who runs the government — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.”

"Being able to control yourself is less common among Left-wingers than conservatives, scientists have found. They say the reason for the difference is that those on the right are more likely to believe that they have free will and that individuals have the power to change things."
There is a Laughing at Liberals YouTube channel.

So God Made a Liberal is a ROTFL video.

Laugh @ Liberals has lots of resources. So does Making Fun of Liberals.
Burt Prelutsky is a powerful poker-of-fun at liberals. “Speaking of those who should be neutered, if not wiped out entirely, liberals have made careers out of mocking conservatives, insisting we’re a bunch of pious busybodies who like nothing better than to condemn other people’s morals.

“But it is those on the Left who consistently show Salem witch hunter Cotton Mather to be something of an underachiever. It’s Democrats who have decided that they and they alone should determine how everybody else should behave.

“So by their lights, it’s okay to be a religious zealot, but only so long as your religion is Islam or Liberalism, but strictly taboo if it happens to be Christianity or Judaism.

“It is also perfectly fine if you’re homosexual or engage in any other sexual activity formerly deemed perverse, unnatural or disgusting. Instead, those are the words liberals reserve for those who smoke tobacco – but not marijuana – and who believe in an omnipotent God other than one named Barack Obama.

“But if you really want to enrage a true leftist believer, let him see you imbibing one of those satanic beverages containing – horror of horrors – sugar! Like Linda Blair in “The Exorcist,” his head will start twirling, his eyes will roll up into his skull and green bile will come spewing from his mouth.

“I assume we are all familiar with Michelangelo’s masterful work on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, showing God, the bearer of life, reaching out to touch his finger to that of Adam. Someone sent me a cartoon recently that showed God holding out, not a finger, but a human brain to his creation, and Adam replying: ‘No thanks…I’m a liberal.’”

See more of Burt’s blasts below.
I have obtained a secret Ovaltine decoder ring that allows me to decipher what progressives really mean when they don’t really mean what they say.

“Progressivism: ‘The courts have spoken.’ Translation: We’ve been stacking the legal system’s deck with our progressive ideas/proxies for over a century now. That way our plans would be exempt from voter scrutiny at the ballot box. On the other hand, should your people get elected and try to undo any of the damage we’ve caused, rest assured there’s an oligarch in a black robe waiting in the wings to strike you down with one bang of his gavel. True, these same judges have almost no constitutional means of enforcing their unlawful edicts, but your side’s leaders are too gutless to call our bluff. They actually repeat our pernicious lie as an excuse for why they can’t do the jobs you elected them to do.

“Progressivism:  ‘The science is settled.’ Translation:   Most of the scientists are progressives, and those that aren’t couldn’t get tenured at band camp. Therefore, there’s really no need continuing to argue when all contrary data is just going to be ignored – or gets the person attempting to introduce it fired from their job”

“Progressivism:  ‘Tolerance.’ Translation:   Tolerance for me, but not for thee. We will clamor for tolerance while our wacky ideas aren’t being tolerated by a society still awash in common sense. However, once we’re allowed to gain a foothold in the culture, “tolerance” will then transition into “dominance” and you will no longer be tolerated. But you will be made to care.  

“Progressivism:  ‘The courts have spoken.’ Translation:   We’ve been stacking the legal system’s deck with our progressive ideas/proxies for over a century now. That way our plans would be exempt from voter scrutiny at the ballot box. On the other hand, should your people get elected and try to undo any of the damage we’ve caused, rest assured there’s an oligarch in a black robe waiting in the wings to strike you down with one bang of his gavel. True, these same judges have almost no constitutional means of enforcing their unlawful edicts, but your side’s leaders are too gutless to call our bluff. They actually repeat our pernicious lie as an excuse for why they can’t do the jobs you elected them to do.”

“Progressivism:  ‘I don’t believe Jesus would (fill in the blank).’ Translation:   The only Jesus we know is the one we use for a swear word. We have no idea what the Bible really says or means, for if we did we probably wouldn’t be progressives in the first place. In our depraved minds, we have erected many shibboleths of the damned. Like preferring to believe Jesus is nothing more than a first century soothsayer. A dispenser of Galilean flower power, if you will… We know not the real Jesus. Reject his Gospel as truth. And believe him to be a liar for claiming to be God, when we know there is no god but ourselves…”
(T)he Fraternal Order of the Perpetually Offended…(are)  people who do not want to be told what to do in their bedrooms, celebrate their self-recognized intellectual superiority by telling the rest of us how we should live, both inside our own bedrooms… These people need to see their opinions validated by seeing others acknowledge and participate in their type of behavior and philosophies, even if those other people are forced into that behavior… Those within the pseudo-intellectual, politically-correct leftist brain trust indulge in using big words and long, rambling sentences to not say much. And one of the best opportunities to allow a lot of words to stroke an unearned ego is to take it upon one’s self to decide who should feel offended and when.


“(P) rogressives spend a good deal of their time berating those who do not share their opinion on the apocalyptic nature of climate change for being ‘science deniers,’ a phrase obviously modeled on the label “Holocaust deniers” and calculated for the same effect. But the problem is that progressives have absolutely no credibility on this file, and it rather looks like they only cling to science when they find it convenient. As Sean Davis put it on Twitter as the caterwauling over the Paris pullout began: ‘If you can’t tell me how many genders there are or when human life begins, I’ll kindly pass on your theories about the weather next century.’… There is also the fact that our enlightened leaders do not treat climate change with the same solemnity when it comes to their own lifestyle choices.”
“Climate change, as an issue, contains pretty much everything leftists salivate over, in terms of controlling people, making people responsible for disasters and calamities, offering them chance to repent, offering them salvation, and then exempting them from the blame that you have foisted on them, and then guaranteeing them clean water and clean air… Climate change contains so much of liberalism, so much of the socialist dream, it’s got everything. It’s got human behavior. It’s got blame. It’s got salvation. It’s got people whose lives don’t mean anything. You can tell ’em they’re saving the planet. It’s got tax increases, it grows government, people willingly support growing government in order to make sure everybody gets to go to the hospital and the doctor and that the climate’s not destroying the planet! And they’ll sign up for that as fast as you can give ’em the forms.”
“Faith in an ideology based on a desire for power over others and the need to feel personally superior without any legitimate accomplishment is perhaps the most dangerous state of being an individual or society can adopt. I would refer to such a mindset as “zealotry,” an integral element of cultism and an extreme result of the elitist side of faith. Zealotry and cultism are not limited to the realm of the religious. Zealotry is a clever devil hiding in the woodwork of any political or academic construct, and this includes the scientific community when it strays away from empirical logic and honest data into a world of pseudoscience and social engineering. I cannot think of a better example of zealotry feeding scientific cultism than the highly propagandized climate change/global warming movement. Anthropogenic (man-made) global warming is quickly becoming the overarching rationale for almost every policy toward global centralization… Those who deny the existence of global warming or who question the legitimacy of its high priests (climate scientists) are not exercising their right to skepticism; they are contributing to inevitable genocide. Therefore, climate denial would have to be punished by government…Under ecological panic, human beings must apply social Darwinism in order to survive. Amoral rationalizations must prevail. Pseudoscientists and the establishment become the purveyors of life and death, prosperity and poverty.” (See “The Common Thread”.
Climate change hysteria has failed to persuade the public because its predictions lack credibility. They’re so incredible, in fact, that even the people making them show little faith in their eventual vindication.”

“All Americans should be alarmed by this because the U.N., in order to combat “Climate Change,” has called for a massive reduction in the world’s population. In fact, U.N. Climate Secretary Christine Figueres has stated for the record that global communism would be the best way to combat climate change.”  
“I don't know of any Christian group that actively calls for environmental destruction. We all have to live on the same planet and breathe the same air. It is in our common interest to have a world free of deadly contaminants. God gave man dominion over the earth, and we are to be good stewards of what has been entrusted into our hands… Starting in the 1960s, activists added a neo-Marxist theology to various ecological concerns, creating the modern environmentalist movement. This utopian visions that environmentalists try to convey today have little do with saving the earth. Their views on environmental issues are heavily tied to political agendas and are often counterproductive to the causes they claim to represent. ‘ For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?" (Matthew 16:26)."
Todd Strandberg, “Bible Prophecy and Environmentalism
See “Climate Change As Religion: The Gospel According To Gore.”
Bible verses about the creation: John 1:3; Colossians 1:16-17; Genesis 1:26; Nehemiah 9:6
Environmental Science from a biblical worldview
Liberal environmentalism is akin to evolutionism which is a lie.
Glenn Beck is deluded about Mormonism, but he understands progressives and Mother Earth worship.

“Both intellectually and financially, the harm that the ideology of sustainability has visited upon academia can’t be overestimated. Intellectually, students have been deprived of the freedom to genuinely think through a topic that, contrary to what “sustainability” zealots would have them believe, deserves to be debated: whole curricula have been restructured to immunize “sustainability” against criticism. Hence, “sustainability” ideologues have insured that education will give way to indoctrination…(I) deologues preempt debate by way of “blatant appeals to authority,” i.e. bogus claims that there is a “consensus” among scientists that favors the position of the true believers.”
“Hollywood and global-warming panic have always been a natural match. After all, who can tell you better to cut back on your wasteful ways better than a high-flying multi-millionaire movie star?… It's never mattered that the stars have all the scientific expertise of Pee Wee Herman. They're just so good-looking and famous, who cares?... It's bad enough that they don't know what they're talking about. It's worse that they're sheer hypocrites while preaching their nonsense. A private jet burns as much fuel in an hour as a car does in a year.” See specific examples.


Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. John 8:44

You can find the Bible verse references to those terms at Bible: King James Version -- Simple Searches.

“(W)e're not just animals, ordained to live in an eco-system, locate food, procreate and try to steer clear of predators. For co-existing with this natural world is a mysterious moral dimension in which we humans are also immersed. Animals don't share this moral realm, nor do plants, rocks, mountains or oceans, nor for that matter do atoms, molecules, planets, stars or black holes, all of which ‘act’ in accord with their given nature, all without honor or dishonor, reward or punishment. Kittens aren’t good, and man-eating sharks aren't bad. Only man dwells in this peculiar moral realm wherein good and evil not only manifest, but seem to be focused directly on recruiting us!... Clearly there is something in our makeup , some mysterious inheritance from ancient times, that beckons us to so easily cross the line of conscience, morality and reason – to violate God's laws, to become spiritual outlaws. In Christian shorthand, we're all ‘born in sin.’… Unfortunately, because repentance and facing our own dark, angry, sinful nature can be painful and requires humility, many people are more inclined to skip the introspection and just appoint an earthly savior to rescue them from their misery.”
(7) CHRISTIANITY (See #20 Conservative Compromise also.)

“It’s much like the old “frog in the pot” parable, in which a frog was placed in a pot of tepid water, with the water temperature being very gently increased. The frog adapted to the warmer water until it eventually cooked to death. Now it appears that Christendom is being cooked at a fast-food rate. False teachers have abandoned trying to ease in “new teachings” and are now racing headlong into heresy after heresy.”
We are, as always, the greatest enablers of the enemy. We are the most compliant tools in Satan’s quest to mold the minds and worldviews of our own children. America seems to be happily plunging itself and its children into the tyranny of Statism primarily because professing Christians have proudly led the way. Rather than lead the culture in repentance and tearing down the enemy stronghold that is the satanic, State-controlled children’s “education” system, it is professing Christians who are among the most vocal and ardent defenders of this child-eating, culture-corrupting abomination. While there’s little left to wonder as to why unbelievers would buy into and strive to prop up the satanic lies at the foundation of the system feeding on the minds and souls of our young, what of the professing church? What of professing Christians? Why are we so into the satanic spin on the pursuit of knowledge?"
“Please understand this: America’s malaise is directly due to the deliberate disobedience of America’s pastors —and the willingness of the Christians in the pews to tolerate the disobedience of their pastor. Nothing more! Nothing less! When Paul wrote his own epitaph, it read, “I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith.” (II Timothy 4:7) He didn’t say, “I had a large congregation, we had big offerings, we had a lot of programs, I had a large staff, and we had large facilities.”
“America will not be restored? Because we don't deserve to be restored! That's why! There is little to no repentance for our national sins and abominations against the God of our fathers. As clearly demonstrated from the election results, nearly half of the citizens of this country have been infected with Marxist/Communist ideology from our schools and universities over the last 50 years. The rest still cling to the Constitution, and at least have some respect for the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, even if they don't consider Jesus to be their Lord and Savior.

“Then, there are the Christians-in-name-only, who warm the cushy pews of the mega-churches and cathedrals, listening to a different gospel every week consisting of prosperity doctrine, or "loving" acceptance of all sorts of sinful lifestyles. You really believe God will hear to their prayers, when even THEY don't see their need to repent and return to the basic tenets of the Bible?!”
“The fact of the matter is that Judeo-Christian ethics have been driven from our culture and declared a dinosaur from an ancient past. Right and wrong, virtue, morality, goodness—these have been rejected in pop culture, our education system, the media, and politics. We have been told repeatedly that character doesn't matter because everyone's values are different. All that matters is an ideological agenda and the power that goes with it.”
Liberals have a methodical plan to devour America through the government school system...Christians continue to have this 'dear-in-the-headlights' reaction to something that they have seen happen again and again and again.  State-by-state, the liberals come in and take over the school boards.  State-by-state, the liberals seek to remove any reference to Jesus.  And state-by-state, Christians act like this is their first time at the rodeo… The key to liberal success is the predictable reaction by Christians…The liberals can be certain of one thing.  They are certain that Christians will give speeches citing their outrage. These speeches will be recited at school board hearings, on TV, on talk-radio, in beauty parlors, and over kitchen tables, and on YouTube videos....  but what will NOT happen, is that Christians will not abandon the government schools.    

Think about this little lesson on compromise that I learned as a liberal.  Imagine there are 2 groups who disagree on a subject.  One group (Christians/conservatives) wants A, the other group (God Haters/liberals) wants Z.    They are at an impasse, so they decide to compromise.  They meet in the middle.  They meet at M.  On the surface, it looks like no one has won, but when you scratch the surface, the Z group has really won.  The Z group has the momentum.   All Z group has to do is wait a little while and then make the argument for Z again.  Z knows that his opponent will not agree, but his opponent might be willing to compromise again…The groups are now M vs Z.  So if we agree to meet in the middle again, we will be at T…M is under the illusion that both sides gave up something.   So again, the Z group will simply wait a while and reach out to the T group regarding their old disagreement, and again the Z group will suggest a compromise, and the T group…will agree to the compromise.  So now they will meet at W.  The Z group has victory at hand.  They only have to wait one more generation before there will be no significant difference between the W group and the Z group.  

Today's kindergarteners will grow up in a school district where Jesus is mocked,  sex is encouraged, homosexuality is celebrated, America is denigrated, conservatives are racists, masculinity is marginalized, big government is celebrated and illiteracy is accepted.  

(The above is from ACLU liberal and atheist, Lisa Watson, in a forwarded email from Ray Moore (Exodus Mandate ) dated 12 August 2016.)
For at least 55 years in America, Christians have opted for “nice” instead of boldly speaking the truth in real love , as exemplified by all the heroes of the Scripture. And what have we to show for it? Practicing homosexuals in the pulpit. Churches condemning Israel. Churches funding abortion. Churches accommodating Sharia, even promoting it. Satanists conducting ‘invocations’ at government meetings. Christian leaders endorsing the ungodly. Churches denying Christ. Pastors recommending “nice”.
(T)he American Christian Church has an identity crisis . Not only do they have difficulty providing an accurate description of the King they claim to serve, but they have an even greater inability to articulate to others the job description of their congregation…(When asked to take a stand against evil a pastor replied), “I would love to be part of it …But unfortunately that is the weekend of our annual Ice Cream Social. Perhaps you can make some calls and see if you could find Someone Else to go in my place.”
(S)o-called leaders among Christian ministries and congregations should get off their collective religious duffs , and start supporting the idea of Christian schooling.  We often hear men say, “God called me to preach the Gospel.”  Did you ever hear one say he was called to encourage his congregation to home school?  Where is the discernment? The discipleship?  And, the dedication to train the next generation 30 hours a week rather than giving them a lick and a promise with only two or three hours per week in God’s house, as they say?... Preaching is much easier and brings in more money than the study of God’s Word, praying for discernment, or spending the effort to train a bunch of kids who don’t carry wallets with lots of cash in them… oh, the LOVE OF MONEY.
(B)y and large the men who currently occupy the pulpit are okay with our children being educated by liars; that is relevant because the pulpit has been complicit in facilitating the humanist's long-term view on society, which goes back to the reason civil government schools were initially created: to displace Christ-centeredness. It has worked; the church has been complicit…(U)nderstand that even though the church consists of a body of believers, only a handful of men go before those believers and preach. Even less preach on "controversial" issues. And so if that handful of men do not address what must be addressed, the body of believers will follow suit. They themselves will become complacent. To the men who occupy America’s pulpits, I say this: if you want God to bless Americans, do something different; say something different. One thing different you can do is instead of ignoring how we as Christians send our children to be educated by liars, in front of your congregation question whether there should be a mechanism (civil government schools) that facilitates such.  (4-8-16 email from Kevin R. Novak, Deconstructing the Coliseum.)
(A pastor said about the situation in America,) “I just preach the Gospel... We just need to pray more. The Lord is in control.”

"Really? Do you earn money or do you just pray for money? Do you pray you will stay in shape or do you work out to stay in shape? Do you simply pray God will feed the starving or do you and your church work to feed them? The Devil’s kids work like everything depends on them. God’s kids act like NOTHING depends on them? Would you act the same way if you really believed you could make a difference? Look in the mirror, Pastor. What if your children’s future depended on you?"
"When the world is at peace and all is well, maybe we can afford a cupcake Christianity that is built on sweet sentimentalism with “Jesus words” sprinkled on top.  Maybe then we can suffer a theology that refuses to see and think and would just as soon pretend Jesus never commanded his disciples to be wise as serpents and on guard against evil men (Matt 10:16-17)."

"Christian parents who have been passive on the Marxist in Econ, the secular-humanist in Humanities, the sexual anarchist in Health, the relativist in Literature, the Howard Zinn hate-America-nihilist in Social Studies, the Darwinist in Biology, and the union capo in the principal’s office will not be alarmed by the “tranny” in the girl’s locker room…They’ll simply roll-over and continue to justify their apathy as they confirm their complicity in the non-parenting of their children. And how dare you for pointing it out! After all, “Have you seen our new Field House?” If the depravity of the “Pubic Schools” has not alarmed them yet, nothing will. Not even a pervert in their daughter’s locker room. They will merely instruct their daughters to “hold it” until next period, or to “use another wash room,” or to “go in pairs,” but they will undoubtedly justify their apathy…

I would think after all those millions of missionary children in the public school system we would have turned a few pagans around by now, but every indicator suggests that it’s the children that are turning…

So why do so many good parents settle for state centers of indoctrination? It’s free, it’s convenient…Parents who wouldn’t allow their children to spend a single hour with a baby-sitter or a neighbor who is outright hostile to their worldview will happily drop them off at a school, 5 days a week, for 8 hours a day, for 9 months out of the year, for 12 years. Living out Deuteronomy 6 in the life of your child is too much to ask…"

“(W)hen you read the Scripture , pay close attention when you land on a chunk of text in which Moses, Joshua, David, Elijah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, John the Baptist, Paul or Jesus is engaged in dialogue with an idiotic idolater, a pompous Pharisee, a pain-in-the-ass politician or a daft disciple. Check it out. You won’t see these searing saints doling out just fluffy stuff. Nope, they would challenge and oft- times ridicule the very ground the impenitent unbeliever or the feigned professor stood on. Not only that. You will rarely see God’s holy ones repenting of the diatribes they aimed at their audiences’ willful blindness.”
The current foundation of Christianity sets itself up for persecution in many cases. The world over, this new foundation of Christianity has traveled a different path away from fundamental Christianity as given in the Scriptures. This new foundation of worship has caused God to turn His face away and now the world lives in a generation of humankind filled with perversions and lack of faith. Instead of trusting in God’s grace and mercy, humankind has turned their faith inward towards self-centeredness
(Perverted sexual) indoctrination has been going on progressively now for generations at the hands of the State with the happy compliance of even most “conservative Christian” parents who now embrace the viability and even necessity of feeding their children to the State for such “unadulterated indoctrination. And  why have said “Christian” parents become such happy supporters of State-run anti-Christian children’s indoctrination? Well, there are many self-serving reasons, but one of the biggest is because their “pastors” and “priests” have overwhelmingly enabled and encouraged them to do so. Possibly the most tragically ironic aspect of this whole mess is that many of the same “Christian leaders” who bemoan the current state of American culture are the very folks   most  responsible for leading it to its presently smoldering, stinking and perpetually sinking condition…With “conservative Christian leaders” like that, who needs “evil Progressives” like Clintons, Obamas and homosexuality advocates?
“Pasturing…hmmm…I think I’m on to something here. That is really what most men in the pulpit really do, isn’t it? They lead the sheep into the pasture and keep them fenced in and at a safe distance from the wolves. Well, it’s time for pastors to stop “pasturing” and start leading!... Tell your “pasture” it’s time for him to man-up and get in the game. Tell him it’s time to lead, not just talk. Tell him that babies are dying (and we know they’re dying) and that God wants His Church to do something about it. Tell him that you will not give one more dollar until he ups his game and starts talking about the issues that truly matter. Tell him it’s time to lead. It’s time to stop asking God to do for us what we refuse to do for ourselves… Is turning a blind eye leading? Is stuffing a sock in your mouth leading? Is refusing to rescue the innocent because of the potential consequences leading? If your “pasture” is hiding in the closet on the most significant issue of our generation, then the answer is painfully clear. He is unqualified and unfit for leadership!”

“We, as Christians, share a large part of the blam e for the heap of putrid caca this country has turned into. The “go along to get along” mentality isn’t just reserved for the spineless a-holes in Congress. We’ve been told to simply pray for our leaders and God will sort everything out eventually. We’ve been told by equally spineless preachers that church is no place for politics. ”
“If ‘bad Christians’ disqualify faith in Jesus, then what about “bad” Lesbians” and their cause? “Bad” physicians? “Bad” butchers, bakers, candlestick-makers? If men and women’s badness or goodness is the sole, definitive benchmark, nothing associated with people makes the cut.”
"While everyone is running around playing pin the blame-tail on the donkey, trying to super-glue responsibility for our nation’s decades long complicated demise, I’d like to put the church at the top of the culpability flow chart. Yes, I blame the brethren, in particular ministers , for not stemming the tide on our nation’s abysmal slide."

"False doctrine in various forms has plagued the church from the earliest days. False teachers weakened the early church, most notably the legalistic Judaizers in Galatia who distorted the Gospel. During the past 200 years theological liberalism (a fancy way of saying unbelief) and skepticism has undermined the church and caused many people to abandon essential doctrines such as the deity of Christ, the inspiration and authority of the Bible, and salvation by faith alone through grace alone. And today the professing evangelical church is weakened by many influences including subjectivism, pragmatism, psychotherapy, a misplaced sense of tolerance, a sloppy understanding of the Gospel and ecumenism that wants to dilute and de-emphasize doctrine."
(F)ew things scare a liberal more than the sight of a Christian on his knees praying to God. Liberals tend to be secular humanists and moral relativists. Secular humanists believe that man is God, a belief system that is fragile at best and quickly falls apart upon even a cursory examination. For this reason, secular humanists can brook no competition from other religions, particularly the religion of Christianity. Liberals simply cannot tolerate a religion with a commandment that says: “You shall have no other Gods before me.” Hence, they have taken it upon themselves to rid America of what they see as the curse of Christianity, a religion that calls into question their narcissistic, secular-humanist self-worship .
“I truly believe that unless the Body of Christ overcomes its laryngitis , and soon, the cost of free speech will become unaffordable for most. As it stands, everyone is free to say what they think…except for those who speak the things of the Lord. YOU are the one I am speaking to. Not your cowardly pastor; he has already shown his stripes…but YOU! When you stand before God you won’t be able to blame your pastor for your lack of backbone. You’ll stand before him naked and alone. YOU are responsible for your apathy. Abortion is murder. Homosexuality is sin. Allah is a false God. Politically correct speech is lying. Bruce Jenner is a deviant. Men who have sex with other men aren’t gay, they are perverted. Obama may claim to be a Christian, but he is a liar and he serves the Father of Lies. Parents who put their kids in public schools are in sin because they permit their children to be indoctrinated with lies. Evolution is a false religion. Feminism is rebellion against God. Liberalism is a mental illness. Conservatism is counterfeit salt… Most people that you encounter in your everyday life are spiritually lost—including those in your very own church. Regardless of what the ignorant god-haters spew, judging is a good thing if it is done righteously. In fact, judging is a sign of wisdom… Demons are real, and demons influence the actions of people. Most so-called “mental illness” is spiritual in nature. Here’s revelation for some: God hates. Let me say that again. God is love…but God hates. We would do well to hate the things that God hates.”

Supreme above all philosophies , all isms and ideologies, is the fullness of the Gospel of God; (that God himself stepped down into human history as Jesus Christ, conceived in the womb of a young unmarried woman who did not choose to be with child or plan on being a mother, to live a sinless life before wicked man whom he came to die for, and redeem from the just wrath of God against sinners. It is the will of God that all men might come to know Him, and in the fullness of time, Christ Jesus has made this possible). The Gospel above all else possesses the capacity to mobilize human action, motivate moral behavior, and mandate consistent compassionate social justice. It is the answer to all of societies (sic) ills and injustices. It is the bulwark against an ever increasing inhumanity of man against man.”
“In an ‘election sermon’ given at Charleston, Massachusetts, April 25, 1799, Jedediah Morse stated: ‘To the kindly influence of Christianity we owe that degree of civil freedom, and political and social happiness which mankind now enjoys. In proportion as the genuine effects of Christianity are diminished in any nation, either through unbelief, or the corruption of its doctrines, or the neglect of its institutions; in the same proportion will the people of that nation recede from the blessings of genuine freedom, and approximate the miseries of complete despotism. I hold this to be a truth confirmed by experience…’ Jedediah Morse concluded: ‘If so, it follows, that all efforts to destroy the foundations of our holy religion, ultimately tend to the subversion also of our political freedom and happiness. Whenever the pillars of Christianity shall be overthrown, our present republican forms of government, and all the blessings which flow from them, must fall with them.’”
We see “the secular left’s utter disdain for both our Creator Christ and His faithful followers is fast approaching critical mass. Self-styled “progressives” – that is, America’s cultural Marxist agents of ruin – typically disguise their designs on despotism in the flowery and euphemistic language of ‘reproductive health,’ ‘anti-discrimination’ and ‘multiculturalism…Still, while most on the left are careful to mask their totalitarian goals and anti-Christian animus by coating these poison pills in sugar sweet jargon, on occasion one of these God-denying goose-steppers will let down his guard, drop the euphemistic BS, and vomit forth that acidic bile, unfiltered ‘progressivism.’”


“(I)t is not that secular progressives don’t believe in the Devil. It’s just that they believe he happens to be a Christian. It’s not that they don’t believe in saints and sinners, it’s that in their creed, saints and sinners have swapped places: An athlete announcing his homosexuality can get a congratulatory call from the President of the United States, while a pastor renowned for his work combatting human trafficking can be forced to withdraw from offering a prayer at that same president’s inauguration as the result of a smear campaign targeting him for his Christian position on marriage.”
“Dawkins asked, 'What's to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn't right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question.' If this is a tough moral question for Dawkins, he should stop pontificating about how religions are 'the root of all evil,' especially since he doesn't believe that evil actually exists! Most Darwinists, however, including those who believe in the evolution of morality, do not have consciences as dead as Dawkins, so they are genuinely outraged by the historical connections between Darwin and Hitler. They consider Hitler truly evil, and they don't want their positive image of Darwin tarnished by any association with this evil man. However, why do they care about this at all? If they believe, as many do, that morality is simply 'an illusion fobbed off on us by our genes,' as evolutionary biologist E.O. Wilson and philosopher Michael Ruse famously put it, then what makes the illusions of some people superior to Hitler's illusions? Why do everything possible -- even denying obvious historical facts -- to obscure the historical linkages between Darwin and Hitler?”
“Tolerance means something different to the ‘progressive’ crowd than it does to the rest of us. Tolerance, as a word, means to accept something or someone that you do not agree with. That’s the definition we USED to know it by in plain English. But, just like Orwell showed us in ‘1984’ Language is something Leftists manipulate to force their will on others. Tolerance NOW means conforming to the socially-acceptable belief that the Left has told us is Valid . These beliefs are adjusted and revised periodically, so what was correct last year might be hopelessly intolerant next…This is the world we find ourselves in. And to belong to any group that does not bow the knee to this tolerance is to invite a level of personal and professional sabotage that, is generally reserved for the purging of a toppled regime, a religious (or anti-religious) inquisition, or other such ‘purges’ of socially undesirable citizens.”
“And then there was the rapid rise of rainbow fascism. Christian bakers are under attack. Christian photographers. Christian pastors. Real people  are losing real businesses  that they had labored for years  to build. Their way of life is being   destroyed. In some cases, Christian business owners saw the wages they needed to feed their families dry up because they were targeted by gay activists and labeled hateful, homophobic bigots simply for declining to assist in celebrating a gay union. That’s all. They just wanted to live their lives in accordance with their own beliefs, and because of that, activists came gunning for them. It wasn’t good enough to go down the street to any number of photographers or bakers who would be more than happy to help celebrate a gay wedding. They needed to see those little family businesses destroyed, even if it meant that the baker and his family ended up on the street. Dissenters must be crushed.”
“In ‘A Confession of Liberal Intolerance’ a New York Times liberal admits, “We progressives believe in diversity, and we want women, blacks, Latinos, gays and Muslims at the table, so long as they aren’t conservatives.” (Or, one might reasonably add, evangelical Christians). (L)iberals profess a love for tolerance and diversity. But when it comes to the most important kind—diversity of thought—he admits that the gatekeepers in academia and the media actively stigmatize those who hold views different from their own.””
“Religious rights granted to every American in the Constitution are anathema to the ACLU. When you hear about Scripture readings, devotions, and prayers being banned from classrooms, graduation ceremonies, sporting events, and the public square, the culprit is typically the ACLU . When you read about so-called “free-speech” zones being established at colleges and universities as a way to muzzle free speech—particularly Christian speech—the culprit, once again, is typically the ACLU… The ACLU is well-staffed, well-equipped, and well-financed. Further, the organization is dedicated to carrying out its nefarious agenda. It has the principle shapers of public opinion and social mores—the public schools, higher education, and the mainstream media—on its side.”  

Lying liberals accuse conservatives of engaging in a “War on Women”. As a conservative male I hereby call upon everyone to stop telling blonde jokes. Blondes are really intelligent fun-loving wonderful women. So, it would be more accurate to insert “liberal” for each “blonde” and “the liberal” for each “her” or “she” in blonde jokes like these and these cool ones.
An atheist author asks, “Why is the Angry Left so Angry?” His answer is, “When I write pieces that upset liberals, I get angry, personal hate mail. When I write pieces that upset social conservatives, I most often get this: ‘I appreciate your well written article and I will pray for you, sir, that you will find the God who loves you.'”

“Indeed, if we want to hate minorities, we should take our direction not from the right, but from the left. They have mastered the art not only of hating minorities, but of creating minorities to hate. They have created a masterful narrative by which the entire female gender, which makes up about half of the population and cannot be counted as a minority at all, is being discriminated against. Then they gave us the additional narrative that blacks, gays, transgendered people, and all sorts of other groups are being persecuted in the exact same narrative. The most fantastic part of this strategy is that they’ve done so without any meaningful evidence whatsoever…”
“Any time you hear a liberal use the term “tolerance” be assured that what is really meant is “conformity.” Liberals will tolerate anyone and anything as long as it conforms to their way of thinking or somehow promotes their nefarious agenda. Consequently, liberal elites just cannot abide the beliefs of old-fashioned, Bible-believing Christians… (N)othing gets the goat of liberal elites faster than someone who openly espouses Christian doctrine rather than meekly accepting leftwing dogma… In fact,   tolerance   is just liberal code for conformity and, the beliefs that   tolerant liberals   insist everyone else conform to are theirs…

“Here are just a few examples of how tolerant liberals really are: 1) If you are opposed to same-sex marriage, liberals don’t even want to hear why—they simply label you a hate-filled homophobe; 2) If you are opposed to abortion, liberals are not interested in your rationale— you are simply labeled a latter-day Nazi making war on women; 3) If you are opposed to Affirmative Action liberals won’t even listen to your rationale—they just label you a racist; and 4) If you hold to traditional Biblical doctrine, liberals treat you like a slow-witted oaf and categorize you as a narrow-minded bigot. The list of examples could go on, but you get the picture.

“Tolerant   liberals are, in fact, the least tolerant people on the planet. They will tolerate no one whose views are at odds with liberal orthodoxy. To liberals, views that do not comport with theirs are by definition wrong and those who hold the offending views are bad… “(I) f liberal elites are offended by an individual’s beliefs, that individual must be attacked, his character assassinated, and his well-being threatened. One point of view that does not pass the smell test of liberal elites is the traditional Christian worldview. In fact, nothing in American society flunks the test faster or more decidedly than Christianity. This, of course, is why   tolerant   liberals are so   intolerant   of Christians. ”

Lady Bree commented on the article: “It is even more than that since the "new" tolerance is really expected to be a tolerance for evil. No one knows that more than Christians. We are expected to be approving and "tolerant" of everything from baby killing to deviant behavior of every stripe and color known to man. If we are the lepers then the liberals are the lunatics of the day hands down.  At the risk of bringing on the Liberal rants the true American culture has been hijacked by this continued tolerated insanity of the Left.   As to debating them, I tried that and came to two conclusions - (1) debate is a Liberal code word for coerce (tactic to subdue) and (2) there is no standard of reasoning with Liberal rants. Therefore I deduce that there is little difference between them and a Fool. Better said this way; - "A fool's lips enter into contention and his mouth calls for strokes. A fool's mouth is his destruction and his lips are the snare of his soul." (Proverbs 18) "The words of wise men are heard in quiet more than the cry of him that ruleth among fools. The words of a wise man's mouth are gracious but the lips of a fool will swallow up himself. The beginning of the words of his mouth is foolishness and the end of his talk is mischievous madness." (Ecc.10:12-13)  

(9) GUNS

“Nowhere is the mushy-headed thinking of liberals more apparent than in the on-going debate over guns. For example, one of the favorite strategies of liberals who get worked up over gun violence is to establish so-called   gun-free zones.   It never seems to occur to anti-gun liberals that gun-free zones are just free-fire zones for criminals who pay no attention to a community’s laws. All a gun-free zone ever turns out to be in practical terms is an area in which criminals have guns and law-abiding citizens don’t. The statistics on gun violence in so-called gun-free zones bear this out… (T)hose who use guns for nefarious purposes who are responsible for gun violence in America—not the guns themselves and not law-abiding citizens who own guns and use them safely… (S)cissors can be used as a deadly weapon, but liberals don’t lobby to out-law scissors. He also points out the obvious about cars and water. Cars can provide convenient transportation for those who obey the rules of the road but a car can be a deadly weapon in the hands of a drunk driver. Water can be used for many positive purposes, but it can also be used to drown people… Liberals tend to be emotionalists anyway, so it should come as no surprise that their responses to guns are emotional rather than logical, factual, or reasonable. It should also come as no surprise that liberals use crass emotional appeals when trying to outlaw guns.  (Quoting Govnor Mike Huckabee: ‘After every horrible mass murder involving a gun, political opportunists race to the microphones to make the strongest possible emotional pitch for watering down the Second Amendment—and weakening the liberty and safety of law-abiding citizens. Even if it is indisputable that their proposals wouldn’t have had the slightest effect on the latest bloodbath, the gun-hating left and a sympathetic media team up.’ He goes on to make the point that all of the various laws proposed to limit gun ownership just punish law-abiding citizens without doing anything to hinder the violent tendencies of those who break the law. Huckabee quotes statistics that show indisputably that the states which adopt the strictest anti-gun laws have the highest rate of gun violence… (Continuing to quote Huckabee): ‘Ironically, many on the left strenuously oppose mental health intervention on the principle that it violates the privacy rights of the patient.’ That’s a liberal for you. Liberals are perfectly content to allow an angry, frustrated, vengeful individual who is also mentally-disturbed to roam free rather than do anything that might be considered an invasion of his privacy. It never seems to occur to hand-wringing liberals that an individual who commits mass murder is going to quickly lose all semblance of privacy anyway… Gun-control laws are not even about guns. They are about government control. Correspondingly, the Second Amendment is not about the right to own guns per se, it is about freedom.”
“Jesus didn’t grow up with guns because guns weren’t around. Neither was text messaging. A lot of things would have been different….Regardless of history or an obvious lack of any Biblical knowledge, leftists continue lecturing us for merely being gun owners. There are a few main culprits, all deriving from a level of understanding of the Bible that can only be described as functionally retarded. So let’s set the record straight on Jesus and self-defense.”

Firearm Facts
: “Fire and water kill more children than guns…(M)ost of our gun injuries are suicide…(T)he criminals who use a gun are almost always part of a drug gang in a failed Democrat city, and that 70 percent of our counties won’t have a single murder this year…(T)he rate of violent crime has fallen while gun ownership has soared…(C)itizens have guns and might resist as the state tells us exactly how to live…Disarmed subjects have no choice but to obey a totalitarian government…Criminals never registered their guns in the first place, so criminals won’t be disarmed.”  
“(T)he actual statistics prove that guns are used for legitimate self defense far more often than murder. These facts however; do little to calm the consistent cry for stricter gun control laws, laws that would do little to prevent   any   tragedy simply because criminals willfully   ignore the law . The very fact that the left so routinely ignores these facts, while displaying such a callous disregard for a person’s inherent right to self defense, while also showing such a high regard for the brutal practices of Planned Parenthood suggests there just might be another agenda at work. Sadly, there is an historical precedent that tells the story, and it is the same every single time. Tyrants rise to power by promising a better world and demonizing those who oppose. Citizens are stripped of their rights and dehumanized for failing to conform to the dictates of an enlightened leader. Strict gun control laws are passed to ensure no man has the means to resist and millions are senselessly slaughtered. In the twentieth century more people were killed by their own governments in a time of peace than were killed by foreign armies in a time of war.
“Define the ‘stronger background check' you want, and tell me just how that check would have stopped any one of the shootings or the urban violence you’re concerned about.’ They can’t. Because no background check, or waiting period, would have stopped any of the things that the gun grabbers say they care about. They want your guns, period.”

"Why are Democrats unable to even ask, if gun control laws are the answer to lowering the nation’s violent death rate, why it is that Chicago, Baltimore and Washington, D.C., with the toughest gun laws on the books, remain the murder capitals of America?
“(T)hrough a campaign of shaming, dissembling, and outright slander, liberals are trying to talk Americans into giving up their weapons voluntarily . There’s always another “common sense” restriction to enact, spurred on by a tragedy that the last “common sense” restriction didn’t prevent and that the proposed new “common sense” restriction would not have prevented. They want to do it in baby steps, and with our cooperation, since they cannot do it by force.”
I assume the author is a liberal since it is highly unlikely a conservative gets published by Psychology Today.  He described what conservatives deal with daily.  The hatred and censorship by the left GREATLY exceeds any ting from the right. He writes: “ Not only is no one teaching Freedom of Speech anymore , that precious freedom is being slowly but surely killed. It is being murdered by the growing social movement that has successfully brainwashed virtually everyone into believing that the solution to human emotional misery is to create, by force of law, a society in which no one says anything anyone else finds offensive, in which there is no stigma, and in which there are no imbalances of power… We are in effect teaching: It is very important to be completely tolerant of everyone. And if anyone shows you any kind of intolerance, we will have no tolerance for them! Ironically, some of the most intolerant, offensive people you can find are ones who most forcefully insist that we need to create a society in which no one is intolerant or offensive.” 
"One of these deliberate distortions   of truth is the notion that gun free zones keep us safe, and if everyone would just do the compassionate thing and turn in their guns, there would be no more violence. That in and of itself is such an obvious misrepresentation of what we know about gun violence; however, it’s one of many misperceptions of reality that are all intertwined with one another, further complicating the situation. To get to the real heart of the problem you have to understand the liberal world view. Too often, we as conservatives allow us to get dragged into the gun debate by responding to contemptible accusations. Liberals tend to be very emotional, and as a result they allow the argument to be directed by their  alleged empathy as they do little more than blame the gun, and the conservative supposedly holding it. We respond, (and this humbled author is guilty of it too) by citing factual statistics concerning firearm use in self defense situations. We believe that we can reason with a human being pushing an agenda, while also in a heightened,  fanatical state."
In God, Guns, Grits, and Gravy, Mike Huckabee wrote, “If employers and colleges are forced to accept candidates of certain races over better-qualified candidates, based solely on their race, that’s ‘affirmative action’ against ‘racism.’ So let’s make sure we understand: In order to keep an employer or college admissions office from preferring one person over another because of race, we   order   them to prefer one person over another because of race. Got it?” Affirmative Action is liberal code for legally codified discrimination


“Does upholding biblical marriage and sexuality, and standing opposed to sinful behaviors such as gay “marriage” and transgenderism, automatically make you hateful and intolerant? Can Christians follow Christ’s command to love God and others and still be opposed to these things? Well, the Bible tells us that “God is love” (1 John 4:8) and, likewise, tells us that “if a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination” (Leviticus 20:13) and “For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error” (Romans 1:26–27). If God—the very one who defines love because he is love—can be loving yet call homosexual behavior a sin, then so can his followers. There’s nothing hateful about pointing out sin. It’s actually the most loving thing a person can do! Those who continue to live in sin—any sin—refusing to repent and seek the Lord’s mercy, are headed for a Christless eternity in hell.”
"KLM Royal Dutch Airlines has produced a Twitter ad meant to pay tribute to Gay Pride events now taking place in Amsterdam. The only thing is, the tweet serves to do the exact opposite. The ad shows three sets of seat belts. The first consists of two “female” ends. The second pairs two “male” ends. The third depicts a male with a female end and is clearly the only seat belt pairing that actually works.  If KLM equipped its aircraft with set number one or number two, its entire fleet would be grounded for safety reasons… Today’s dominant narrative that gays are weak victims, deprived of marriage by society, is a fabrication. The exact opposite is true: Gays are extremely strong-minded and iron-willed in their rejection of women, resolute in their choice not to grow as human beings in their appreciation for half the human race." 
“A transsexual may dupe everyone else into saying he is a woman, but even he knows he is not and will never be. If you robbed a bank or cheated on your wife and I tell you how disgusted I am with you (and that's what I would do!), and you jump off a bridge, it isn't my fault for making you feel bad about your choices!!!” (From a friend via email.)
Dear Abby told a "saved Christian" teen asking about joining a "Gay-Straight Alliance club" with a “gay” friend: "(S)omewhere you got the impression that sexual orientation is a choice. It isn't. Your friend's orientation was determined before she was born, just as yours was.”  So Abby should support a Promiscuous-Fidelity Alliance club since the trait of promiscuity is the way most males (and a lot of females) are born with.
“Homosexuality is destructive. Transgenderism is a disorder. It is not a civil right. Kids should not be learning about this stuff. And adults should be learning the truth. There is no reason to be in bondage to a behavior that will cut your lifespan by twenty percent, which will lead to a further spread of disease. It’s hurting our culture. It’s hurting our society… The Left’s distorted psychological state can only stay intact if we are too fearful or intimidated to challenge it openly and break it down. But left alone, their hate and oppression will know no bounds.”
“Transgenderism, for all its promotion as today’s cause célèbre is not real in any world but the political. Science recognizes the disorder of gender dysphoria, but beyond this disorder, there is no scenario where a woman is actually a man, though she posses two X chromosomes, ovaries, and other things specific to female biology. Likewise, a man cannot menstruate or become pregnant, or give birth.”
"Why compete at all? Why have men compete against men and women compete against women? Why have weight classes? Why not just throw everyone into the same competition and have the world's strongest (or fastest) human - of either sex, in any weight class, at any distance, in any event? Why not blur all distinctions, if a man can now compete side by side with women?... But no, the whole world must revolve around the perceptions of those who identify as transgender, regardless of how it hurts others, regardless of how it inconveniences others, regardless of what new inequities it causes.”
Leftists smugly ask what they perceive to be 
THE “gotcha” question about trannies in restrooms: “So, are we going to have genital police?” To those smugsters, I ask, “How will  you  determine whether the burly, bearded, bulging-biceped person in the women’s restroom or locker room is a member of the “trans” cult or a predator  pretending  to be a member of the “trans” cult?
“The Left says that ‘gender identity’ is immutable and, therefore, even young children should be able to access medical help to refashion their bodies in such a way as to make them match the sex that corresponds to the cultural conventions these children prefer. In other words, young boys who “identify” as girls do so based on their desire to wear girls’ clothing, have long hair, and play with girls’ toys. But the Left says these are merely arbitrary, socially constructed norms. So, why change their bodies? Rather than rejecting their bodies, why not reject the norms they believe have no objective reality or meaning? Of the many tragic consequences of this science-denying sexuality dogma is the fact that “transitioning” is harming people. Society is marching blindfolded into a brave new dystopian world whose victims are increasingly children who will one day tell their stories of regret…”
“LGBT groups have been effective in linking their immoral cause to the noble civil rights movement. In reality, gays never wanted equality. They wanted society to accept their sinful lifestyle, or else. LGBT groups – to be blunt – act like fascists. Just like militant Islam demands Shariah law, homosexual pressure groups demand ‘sodomy law.’ So what’s so bad about discrimination anyway? Discrimination has always been a hallmark of freedom. The ability to discriminate is given to us by God so that we can make right choices. People discriminate all the time. We discriminate when we date, marry, pick our friends and in countless other ways, just like homosexuals do. And LGBT groups and liberals discriminate against people of faith all day long!
A friend wrote: “I wonder if at some point there will have to be new legislature to define how many times taxpayers will have to pay for inmates to undergo sex change operations? For those who see it as fluid, who's to say a man, thinking they are a woman, gets approved to change the parts, then prefers the previous parts, and wishes to undergo operation #2, or 3? It doesn't seem fair to only allow a one-time transformation. Perhaps they will stipulate that after one sex change, the person will be required to have both parts?"
A friend says, “My wife and I are still waiting for it to work, that we identify ourselves as transbillionaires, as part of the trans-wealth community.”
If liberals support LGBTQ rights they should support the rights of people who are BPCNS (Bestiality, Coprophilia, Paedophilia, Necrophilia, Sadism all the way through the alphabet).
The “DNA deniers at Planned Parenthood and in the Democratic Party are desperate to ignore the scientific fact that an unborn child has his or her own DNA, separate from the mother…(They also deny) human sexuality and the biological differences between men and women…liberals and their media allies always claim they are in favor of science on matters such as global warming or climate change. But on the matter of human sexuality, science is denied and people are allowed to make up ‘facts’ about themselves…The notion that a girl is a boy is one of the biggest examples of "fake news" we can find. If you can't separate boys from girls, everything else is up in the air and anything goes.
"There are no lab tests or medical findings that can even prove the existence of transgenderism
. The only way to diagnose it is when someone self-identifies as transgender. No amount of hormones or cosmetic surgery can effect a biological change of sex. Feelings, no matter how strong, cannot change sex. To pretend anything else is only a masquerade."
“The same people who plead for ‘tolerance’ have adopted the practice of taking a large minority of the population—biological males who identify as masculine—and describing their sexual preference and gender identity as ‘toxic.’ This brophobia is now so rampant, casual, and unchecked on our college campuses that it is becoming—what’s the word I’m looking for?—oh, yes, it’s becoming ‘systemic.’ The practice of demonizing men for their gender identity is being institutionalized.”
“I have not found one piece of history, or any artifact for that matter, that shows homosexuals and transgenders being locked in the bowels of a slave ship and transported against their will to a foreign land where they were shackled and whipped into servitude. I know of no homosexual who was forced into the separate but equal second class citizenship of Jim Crow and systemically denied access to jobs, education, housing, goods, and services. In fact, unless a homosexual states he is a homosexual, how would one even know he is so? The last time I looked in the mirror, anyone who is able to see can clearly see my ethnicity; my “paint job” is there for the world to see. The black community in America should be marching in the streets not for Black Lives Matter, but in outrage that the legacy of the pioneers of the Civil Rights Movement has been trampled and soiled by the radical factions of the homosexual and transgender community and their agenda toward normalization in society.”

“(T)he homosexual movement gained traction when it was able to get the psychological and academic communities to first reclassify homosexuality from a deviant behavior to merely an orientation. The next push was to get medical data supporting the theory that one is  born homosexual. Once that was accomplished (inconclusively so, not unlike evolution), the goal was to obtain minority status and claims for special status, as in a persecuted class of people deserving of special treatment, or “civil rights.” Couple that with the indoctrination of the populace in public school systems and colleges and universities in hopes of causing a culture shift, and you have the fine mess we are in today.”
Say that I am sentenced to a five-year prison term for bank fraud. Though confinement can never be pleasant, I'd find it far more tolerable if I could convince the judge that though biologically I have XY chromosomes, in my opinion I'm really a woman and thus my confinement should be in a female prison with a female cellmate. For the court to fail to take my sexual opinion into consideration would violate our Constitution's Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, I could say.
"Feminism rebelled against reality. Transgenderism seeks to abolish it entirely …An angry woman demanded to know if a man in a dress - or even a man with a sex change - could understand menstrual cramps, pregnancy, or dozens of other things women experience…(I)f xx chromosomes no longer determine who is a woman, and traditionally female experiences no longer matter, than what is a woman, anyways? “Woman” becomes simply a word that anyone can claim, regardless of biological reality or life experience.  .. Facts and reason and common sense no longer have a place in this debate, because those who decide to identify with a gender that conflicts with biological reality have created a racket that is impervious to criticism. After all, reality is irrelevant. They are saying that they   feel  as if they are actually the opposite sex, and who are we to argue with that?... While the feminists claimed that assuming women liked to wear dresses and skirts and other traditionally feminine clothing was insulting, the first thing a transgender dude does when he wants to prove he’s a woman is yank a cocktail dress over his head."  
"It is likewise true that a person born with XX chromosomes is, and shall always be, female, while a person born with distinct X and Y chromosomes is forever male. Again, no amount of self-delusion, gnashing of teeth, cross-dressing, genital mutilation surgery, or utterly bizarre presidential doublethink dictates can alter this unalterable fact…It is likewise true that a person born with XX chromosomes is, and shall always be, female, while a person born with distinct X and Y chromosomes is forever male. Again, no amount of self-delusion, gnashing of teeth, cross-dressing, genital mutilation surgery, or utterly bizarre presidential doublethink dictates can alter this unalterable fact…Cultural Marxism entails, among other things, that secularist aspect of left-wing statist ideology that seeks, within society, to supplant traditional values, norms and mores with postmodern moral relativism. It endeavors to destroy innocence, sexualize children, desensitize them to sexual perversion of every stripe and, quite literally, expose as many young girls as possible to adult male genitalia. Cultural Marxists aim to scrub America of her Judeo-Christian, constitutional-republican founding principles…We Americans who happen to be tethered to scientific and moral reality will never, ever surrender…We Americans who happen to be tethered to scientific and moral reality will never, ever surrender."
“Liberals are quick to criticize Christian businesses such as bakeries who refuse to condone their sexual preferences. Yet, they are too chicken to do the same to Muslims.” See: HIDDEN CAMERA: Gay Wedding Cake At Muslim Bakeries.
“Some have asked the obvious question “Why would people want to patronize a business that doesn’t want their business when there are many other businesses that would be eager to serve them?” It’s a good question, which would make sense if the answer was that the prospective customer was actually looking for goods or services. That’s not what we are dealing with here. Instead, we have militant activists with chips on their shoulders, seeking a self-righteous sense of victimhood. They are not “proud.” They are so pathetically insecure that they want the boot of government on the neck of people to force them to give approval to behavior that many of us will never approve.”  
A student “attempted to defend the truth about marriage among a group of peers at a secular university. She presented a meaningful argument about families, social stability, and gender complementarity. None of her classmates refuted her arguments. Instead, they accused her of being a bigot and a homophobe, called her intolerant, and changed the topic to something less intellectually taxing. (Her) experience is practically a cliché. Americans who offer traditional viewpoints on moral issues in the public square have become accustomed to calumny. They know that reasoned arguments will rarely receive reasoned refutation.”
“For years, proponents of so-called same-sex marriage  have resorted to a lame demographic argument to “prove” that they are right. Young people support it, so come on, idiot geezers, get with the program! Seriously? That is idiotic on its face. We know  how ignorant  this bunch is, in general. The very fact that people 18-29, who grew up on a steady diet of Will and Grace and making sure that “everybody wins!” so that no one’s feelings are hurt, are susceptible to appeals to “tolerance” without any appreciation for the consequences should surprise no one. The fact that alleged adults consider that fact a game changing argument should alarm all thinking citizens.”
"Maggie Gallagher, a co-founder of National Organization for Marriage, says that homosexual advocates have no interest in a 'live and let live tolerance'. And that after redefining marriage, their agenda will be to redefine Christianity."

LGBT is really not concerned about having same sex couples be legally equal to married couples. This is all a cover for an attack on the legitimacy of God’s Word (The Bible) and Christianity as a whole. One problem is that many Christians have fallen victim to the teaching that if we (Christians) fight back, it doesn’t properly reflect the love of Christ that we are called to display. So as not to offend, we strive to maintain civility and a degree of political correctness in our encounters. The fact that LGBT have chosen to use God’s rainbow as a symbol for a life style that has been condemned by God as an detestable sin, is not a coincidence. This perversion of a religious symbol should be viewed as hate speech, at least theft of intellectual property, an attack on religious freedom, something!... Christians do not hate homosexuals, lesbians, transgender, or bisexuals anymore than God does.

LGBT is really not concerned about having same sex couples be legally equal to married couples. This is all a cover for an attack on the legitimacy of God’s Word (The Bible) and Christianity as a whole. One problem is that many Christians have fallen victim to the teaching that if we (Christians) fight back, it doesn’t properly reflect the love of Christ that we are called to display. So as not to offend, we strive to maintain civility and a degree of political correctness in our encounters. The fact that LGBT have chosen to use God’s rainbow as a symbol for a life style that has been condemned by God as an detestable sin, is not a coincidence. This perversion of a religious symbol should be viewed as hate speech, at least theft of intellectual property, an attack on religious freedom, something!... Christians do not hate homosexuals, lesbians, transgender, or bisexuals anymore than God does.”
(F)rom a biblical standpoint, homosexual behavior, or “the sin of Sodom” as it’s oft referred, is likewise objectively immoral (along with its oxymoronic offshoot: counterfeit “same-sex marriage”). Jesus defined marriage for us. His definition is reflected in the spiritual, biological and in-every-other-way-self-evident order of His divinely defined design. (Matthew 19:4-6) Moreover, the very thing that defines “gay marriage,” the biologically and spiritually disordered act of same-sex sodomy, is, likewise, a counterfeit. It mocks God’s design for natural sexual intercourse. Indeed, the Bible, throughout both the Old and New Testaments, unambiguously condemns as “vile affections,” as sin rising to the level of “an abomination,” all same-sex sexual conduct, be it, “loving, monogamous and committed,” or otherwise.

“This is it. I’m coming out . I want the world to know. I’m a black, lesbian platypus trapped in a white, straight guy’s body. This is my truth. It’s my experience. It’s how I identify. It’s my reality (actual reality notwithstanding). Transracial, transgender and transpecies lives matter (#TransLivesMatter), and I’m declaring myself an out and proud member of the LGBTTT community. Crazy, you say? Don’t judge me, hater. This is my race-species-gender identity and expression, whether real or perceived, and if you refuse to play along, then you’re violating my civil rights… For relativism to work – and that’s what we’re talking about here; relativism – reality must be undone, adherents to objective truth pilloried and all dissent stifled.”
"The cultural battle that is raging in American society is not between those who advocate for gay rights and those who advocate for religious rights. Rather the battle is between Christianity itself and those who oppose Christian values. Ask yourself this question: How many cases have you seen so far in which same-sex marriage (SSM) advocates have targeted Muslim, Hindu, or Jewish businesses?... While making life difficult for those who refuse to endorse SSM is part of the cultural left’s agenda, punishing those who oppose the concept is small potatoes compared to the larger agenda of the cultural left: shutting down Christianity itself. Cultural liberals know what many Christians are only now beginning to acknowledge: The cultural war is on and orthodox Christianity is the enemy that has been targeted by the Left…SSM advocates are now using bullying tactics against Christian businesses that are reminiscent of those used against Jewish businesses in the years leading up to World War II. They are not yet burning and looting Christian businesses, but they are targeting them for bullying tactics designed to put them out of business. Their message is clear: “Endorse our homosexual beliefs or we will destroy you.” Just as the Nazis had the support of the German government in carrying out their anti-Judaism agenda, SSM advocates have the support of the federal government in carrying out a campaign of harassment, threats, and lawsuits against Christian business owners
"A church pastor took a righteous stand against homosexuality. He was sued. When the homosexuals lost the lawsuit the true nature of homosexuals came out. The pastor “ received obscene phone calls, dozens of threatening letters, pornographic materials mailed to us, and death-threats, some of which described the children in detail -- their names, ages, what they looked like, where they attended school, and what sexually deviant acts were going to be performed on them before they killed the children. More than once we had to leave the city for safety… Homosexual protestors attended Sunday morning worship services. Some defaced pew Bibles and psalters. Others would stand up, walk around, slam windows, and verbally protest while Chuck was speaking…(H)undreds of angry homosexuals stormed city hall, set fire to trash cans and parts of the building, set police cars on fire, broke windows, and injured scores of policemen… Rocks, beer bottles, beer cans were thrown through the church windows on many occasions. Swastikas were carved in the church doors and drawn on our house. A window in our car was smashed out. Graffiti was spray-painted all over the church, house, and sidewalk. Anti-Christian, pro-homosexual leaflets were scattered around the neighborhood calling us Nazis, bigots, anti-gay, etc.  Their children were once again threatened. The daily threats and harassment continued for a full three years. (The pastor’s house was firebombed.) The fireman on the scene told the (them), ‘The intent was to kill. It's as if someone pointed a gun in your face and pulled the trigger . . . only, in this case, the gun misfired!’…

“Homosexuals are one of the most mean-spirited and violent groups in America when they do not get their way. Since they no longer fear God, they certainly do not fear man… Homosexuals have jammed their perverted view of justice and morality down our throat. Through fear and intimidation, the homosexual community has beaten back the opposition. They no longer have to riot and bomb since they have friends in high places who have given in to their outrageous demands. But just below the surface of the genteel facade often displayed by homosexuals in movies and comic acts resides a dark and foreboding evil that will surface when the need arises.”

Liberals and LGBT activists are vicious, bullying, lying, hypocritical, angry, and fanatically dedicated. Such a large-scale denial of reality requires it. They have no interest in fairness   –  only force. Yes, one of their favorite tactics is to attack and brutally libel anyone who disagrees with them. Much of this also has to do with their own self-centeredness and need to feel superior.”
“The truth is that the objective of the homosexual campaign is not about American freedom. The objective is the delegitimization and annihilation of Christianity in America.”
(A) difference between liberals and conservatives is that liberals seem obsessed with the sin of hypocrisy , a common human frailty that we’re all guilt of, to a greater or lesser extent. On the surface it might seem that they really don’t care what you do—cheat on your wife, use drugs, dodge the draft—just as long as you don’t get preachy about it. From their perspective, only those who espouse standards should be held to them. If, on the other hand, you don’t pretend to be anything other than a dirt ball, welcome to the (Democratic) Party!

That’s why you can’t oppose same-sex marriage if you’ve ever been unfaithful to your spouse, or had a divorce, or simply never been married, because you obviously don’t believe in that “sanctity of marriage” crap. They can do all of those things, of course, and many same-sex marriage supporters have catted around on their wives—Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jesse Jackson, Bill Clinton, and Gavin Newsome to name a few. But   you   can’t, because that would be hypocritical. Philandering is forgivable, opposing their agenda isn’t.

You can almost see the glee in their eyes whenever they find a conservative who has fallen short of his professed values.
This whole hypocrisy shtick is a one way street. Liberals are in fact deeply hypocritical about hypocrisy… (T)hey’re tolerant of pretty much anything as long as you’re on their team.


“Here are six conundrums of socialism in the United States of America:
1. America is capitalist and greedy – yet half of the population is subsidized.
2. Half of the population is subsidized – yet they think they are victims.
3. They think they are victims – yet their representatives run the government.
4. Their representatives run the government – yet the poor keep getting poorer.
5. The poor keep getting poorer – yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.
6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about - yet they want America to be more like those other countries.”
“Government bodies that are supposed to serve the people — like the Internal Revenue Service, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Motor Vehicles, to name just a few — far too frequently subjugate, regulate and violate them. The welfare of the collective is replacing the rights of the individual. And propelling this socialist view forward is, sorrowfully, the younger generation, comprised of individuals who know nothing of the true price of freedom — who’ve not been forced to pay with sweat and blood and loss, as the patriots of America’s founding days were or as the brave U.S. military fighters of subsequent decades were. Rather, for them freedom is being free of offensive thoughts. They think freedom means being pain-free, struggle-free, effort-free, offense-free. And they think any kinks that threaten that definition of freedom must be obliterated …— like all those with patriotic, conservative, free-market, good old-fashioned American principles and Judeo-Christian beliefs. But why do they think that way? Because our nation, through the years, has chosen to let government be the guide, not God. We’ve picked a path of moral comfort, not compass, and the price is an anything-goes culture that caters to the lowest denominator of humanity.”
There are two misconceptions held by many Americans.  The first is that communism ceased to be a threat when the Soviet Union imploded.  The second is that the New Left of the Sixties collapsed and disappeared as well… Because the New Left lacked cohesion it fell apart as a political movement.  However, its revolutionaries reorganized themselves into a multitude of single issue groups.  Thus we now have for example, radical feminists, black extremists, anti-war ‘peace' activists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, and ‘gay' rights groups.  All of these groups pursue their piece of the radical agenda through a complex network of organizations such as the Gay Straight Lesbian Educators Network (GSLEN), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), People for the American Way, United for Peace and Justice, Planned Parenthood, Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), and Code Pink for Peace. Both communism and the New Left are alive and thriving here in America.  They favor code words: tolerance, social justice, economic justice, peace, reproductive rights, sex education and safe sex, safe schools, inclusion, diversity, and sensitivity.  All together, this is Cultural Marxism disguised as multiculturalism.
“Here in the U.S. the falsely idolized ‘two-party system’ allows the elitist faction forces that created and back Obama (including the quisling GOP leaders who collaborate with him) to offer the American people no alternative to a poisonous snare like that Obama laid unsuccessfully against Netanyahu.

“They promise ‘free’ goods and services; access to jobs and housing, and a world where no licentious conduct will be frowned upon, whatever its implications for the social cohesion and liberty of society. With unity on their lips, they foment deadly racial tensions and enmity. With rights as their mantra, they construct a totalitarian regime
of surveillance, censorship, and retribution calculated to stifle or punish dissent, even if that means contradicting the freedom to question, criticize, and reexamine "official" theories, a freedom which is vital to the scientific method on which they pretend to rely.

“Tragically, unlike the Israelis, it seems we now have a colluding, single faction political system that too often deprives sincerely conscientious voters of any say in our politics. People who seek to serve America's good are told they must settle for whatever choice of evils the one-party faction sham allows. Through a combination of media repression, lies, and fraudulent proceedings, they are robbed of honest representation -- and will continue to be, unless we stay right with God, unite and fight back!”

(Dr. Alan Keyes. Regular mail from the Declaration Alliance. received 4-15-15)

See more of Dr. Alan Keyes's great comments. (His closing comment is outstanding.)
Do not confuse “Capitalism” with “Crony capitalism” which is defined as “A description of capitalist society as being based on the close relationships between businessmen and the state. Instead of success being determined by a free market and the rule of law, the success of a business is dependent on the favoritism that is shown to it by the ruling government in the form of tax breaks, government grants and other incentives.”


The military began to be destroyed when women went on warships.  Next was homosexuals in the ranks, and finally the removal of references to Jesus Christ.

Pregnant Sailors  

Navy  Transfers Expectant Mothers

Baby  on Board

Bootie  Camp

Deployed US Navy Has A Pregnancy Problem, And It’s Getting Worse

More (from the 1990s) reasons why female and male soldiers do not mix

Here it is in 2016 and it is worse!
(D)o you think America’s enemies will volunteer to fight with one hand tied behind their backs to level the battlefield, too? Mentally stable Americans should wonder if liberals dream up such suicidal schemes on their own, or is this some subversive plot concocted by communist moles and Islamic-terrorist spies lurking within our government? A normal person would think that only our enemies would seek to emasculate our military…


“Firewalls that once strictly separated news from opinion have been replaced by hopelessly blurred lines. Once-forbidden practices such as editorializing within straight news reports, and the inclusion of opinions as if fact, are not only tolerated; they’re encouraged.”
When was the last time you saw a mainstream news report refer to, say, a gay-rights organization as a ‘far-left liberal group?’ Not recently? OK, let's ask the question in reverse: When was the last time you saw an organization that stands for traditional religious beliefs characterized — in a mainstream news report — as a ‘far-right conservative group?’"
Liberals are moral relativists.

“So you’ve decided to become a moral relativist. Good for you! What could be better than doing whatever feels right? What could be worse than letting someone tell you what you should and shouldn’t do? Plus, it’s one of the easiest worldviews to adopt: Just leave everyone else alone and demand that they do the same for you, and you’ll never have to worry again about whether your actions are right or wrong. In fact, there are really only seven things that you can’t do as a moral relativist. Simply follow the rules below, and you’ll be free from absolutes forever!

“Rule #1: Relativists Can’t Accuse Others of Wrong-Doing…
Rule #2: Relativists Can’t Complain About the Problem of Evil…
Rule #3: Relativists Can’t Place Blame or Accept Praise…
Rule #4: Relativists Can’t Claim Anything Is Unfair or Unjust…
Rule #5: Relativists Can’t Improve Their Morality…
Rule#6: Relativists Can’t Hold Meaningful Moral Discussions…
Rule #7: Relativists Can’t Promote the Obligation of Tolerance…”
Right Graphics
“Big Science and Big Media continue their cozy relationship with leftist and libertarian groups that advocate free thinking, free loving, and freedom from moral restraint…Sometimes, though, facts don’t care about political correctness.” (Lists several examples)
Socialism has been at war with marriage and the family
since the late-18th century. The most prominent socialist thinkers, including Rousseau, Marx and Engels, promoted the sexual revolution in which marriage and family were devalued in order to eliminate loyalties other than to the state.
Cultural Marxism places great emphasis on analyzing, controlling, and changing the popular culture, the popular discourse, the mass media, and the language itself. Seeing culture as often having more or less subconscious influences on people which create and sustain inequalities, Cultural Marxists themselves often try to remove these inequalities by more or less subtle manipulation and censorship of culture. A term describing such censorship is political correctness where all views on equality that disagree with the Cultural Marxist view are avoided, censored, and punished. Related to Cultural Marxism are various forms of relativism/subjectivism and denial of the existence of objective knowledge.”
Socialism sounds great
. It has always sounded great. And it will probably always continue to sound great. It is only when you go beyond rhetoric, and start looking at hard facts, that socialism turns out to be a big disappointment, if not a disaster… Facts are seldom allowed to contaminate the beautiful vision of the left. What matters to the true believers are the ringing slogans, endlessly repeated.
Both communism and the New Left are alive and thriving here in America.  They favor code words: tolerance, social justice, economic justice, peace, reproductive rights, sex education and safe sex, safe schools, inclusion, diversity, and sensitivity.  All together, this is Cultural Marxism disguised as multiculturalism.
Dinesh D’Souza
“views the Progressive movement as a criminal enterprise designed to pull off the biggest heist in world history — effective control of the enormous wealth created by America’s entrepreneurs…Cultural indoctrination in the unfair-society pitch of progressive politicians is accomplished by inundating Americans with television programs, news stories, and Hollywood films that feature crooked businessmen, victimized minorities, oppressed workers, heartless millionaires, and hypocritical ministers.  These professional propagandists promulgate their ideas out of envy, seeing themselves as members of the rightful ruling class based on their superior intellects and abilities.”  
"There is no such thing as 'racial profiling' or 'religious profiling' per se. There is only good criminal profiling and bad criminal profiling…I’m a member of one of the most profiled groups in the nation: males. Police view men much more suspiciously than women because men commit an inordinate amount of the crime…If a white man is cruising a bad neighborhood in an expensive car, the police may stop him because they know the probability is relatively high he’s there to buy drugs…Profiling is simply a fancy name for the “application of common sense.”  

“Why is it important for Americans to understand what awaits them at the bottom of the slippery slope liberals are pushing our economy down? It is important because lurking at the bottom of this slippery slope is socialism, and history has shown over and over that socialism does not work . Writing for THE FREEMAN, Mark J. Perry had this to say about the ultimate failure of socialism wherever it has been tried: ‘While it promised prosperity, equality, and security, it delivered poverty, misery, and tyranny. Equality was achieved only in the sense that everyone was equal in his or her misery.’ Socialism is one of those concepts that looks good on paper but breaks down in reality because it eventually succumbs to the tenets of human nature.”

“1. We are advised NOT to judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. 

“2. Seems we constantly hear about how Social Security is going to run out of money. How come we never hear about welfare or food stamps running out of money? What's interesting is the first group "worked for" their money, but the second didn't. 

“3. Why are we cutting benefits for our veterans, limited pay raises for our military and cutting our army to a level lower than before WWII, but we are not stopping payments to illegal aliens such as monthly payments for each child, money for housing, Food Stamps, free education including college and also the right to vote?” 

“(P)ortraying various groups as abused victims has been an extremely effective strategy for cramming their socialist/progressive agenda down the throats of the majority… Most Americans drank the left's Kool-Aid of deception, believing them when they said all homosexuals are asking for is tolerance.  Suddenly, out of nowhere, Americans are petrified to disagree with same-sex marriage… Decades of leftist indoctrination have caused a generation of young people to believe that white Americans, particularly heterosexual white males, are the greatest source of evil in the world.”
It’s impossible to placate the Left . These loons want open borders, no rules, total socialism. We can’t hit our kids or hold them responsible. We can’t expect better from them in school or work. We can’t force people to work in any way, whether they be on welfare or in jail. So we can’t demand anything of our citizen and non-citizens, yet they can demand and expect everything from the government via the law-abiding taxpayers.”
"The idea of being hypocrites doesn’t seem to cross the malcontents’ minds. The leftist website Think Progress began its piece about Columbus Day by complaining that, “it glorifies a man who launched a large-scale genocide and European colonization.” One wonders where those Think Progress folks would rather live. If they pine for an undeveloped paradise in Africa, South America or Asia, why don’t they pack up their bicycles and take off for the nearest cruise line or airport?"
“The symptoms of narcissism are vanity; materialism; an inflated sense of one’s own specialness or importance; antisocial behavior; little interest in emotionally close or unselfish relationships, along with a lack of empathy; exaggerated overconfidence; and a strong sense of entitlement. Sound like anyone you know? “Twenge and Campbell (authors of The Narcissism Epidemic ) correctly lay much of the blame for the epidemic at the feet of the self-esteem movement, which has been enormously influential, not only in the spheres of popular psychology and education, but also as a central tenet of the “gospel of success” message heard in many evangelical megachurches… Humility is a distinctively Christian virtue, grounded in the doctrine of Christ’s kenosis. It is not triumphalism, but simply a fact of history: Christianity was the leaven that shaped a more humble and humane culture; gave rise to America’s founding values; and, ultimately, prevented us from worshipping ourselves. The cure? Either we will become the salt and light that purge and dispel the insipid narcissism that surrounds us, or our culture will continue to descend deeper into the loud, crass, and aggressive cult of self-worship.” 
Stanley Kurtz , a scholar, author and social critic from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, was an old-fashioned liberal who became more conservative after numerous experiences of wrenching hypocrisy and political correctness in the academy. He got his Ph.D. in social anthropology from Harvard, has won numerous teaching awards and has written several books. He wrote, “ American exceptionalism, to left-wing ideologues, is a quaint and excessively positive notion to be discredited through re-education efforts. Leftists decry patriotism that emanates from history that touts American exceptionalism. The ideologues believe that, without proper training and re-education, Americans would exhibit excessive bias against those who are not Americans.” Asked about the emphasis on creating “global citizens” as opposed to understanding the founding principles of America, the conservative scholar says progressives decry American exceptionalism and belittle self-government. Instead, they value trans-globalism, open borders and the United Nations.”

“With socialism, the state is supreme and all problems have the same solution: government. In a socialist system, responsibility is replaced by an aversion to responsibility, and charity is replaced by government entitlements. A government entitlement is charity by force, which is not charity at all. It is legalized theft. When the state becomes supreme and government becomes the solution, the entrepreneurial spirit, work ethic, freedom, and liberty quickly become casualties.”
“How about amputating perfectly sound arms and legs because some poor deranged wacko wants to be disabled? …They call it “trans-ableism,” and now it’s got perverse philosophers to explain it (lol), defend it, celebrate it, and sell it to the rest of us…In recent years the Left has become increasingly insane and self-destructive; and the court’s “gay marriage” ruling has ignited their triumphalism. Having successfully torpedoed marriage and the family, they are on a roll…. If we are compelled, as we are today, to confess that a surgically mutilated man is now a “woman,” on pain of being ostracized for being “haters,why should we not be forced to confess that other perverted “feelings” are the new reality? If a man and a man now constitute a “marriage,” where, logically, do we stop? Why not force society to pay for unnecessary operations, and cater to, and praise, those who insist on having them? This goes beyond mere craziness. America doesn’t need any more elections. It needs an exorcism.”
“It is not difficult to see how values neutrality and moral relativism would lead to a culture of cheating. In both cases, what makes something right or wrong is the self-interest of the individual involved. In other words, if I subscribe to values neutrality and moral relativism, what is good for me is good period. Rather a convenient view of morality is it not? Beginning in the late 1960s and continuing to the present students have been fed a steady diet of values neutrality and moral relativism by liberal elites who control the nation’s public schools, colleges, and universities and use them as vehicles for the force-feeding of their secular humanistic worldview…Cheating is just another form of stealing and lying, both of which are proscribed in the Ten Commandments. But therein is the rub. The Ten Commandments and all other aspects of Christian teaching have been squashed by liberal elites who worship the false deities of values neutrality and moral relativism.”
“Few things could so starkly reveal the dark side of moral relativism as the atrocities being performed by Planned Parenthood. An organization that heretofore was known for being a nationwide abortion factory revealed itself to be something even worse: a retail outlet for merchandising the body parts of aborted babies. Anti-abortion advocates naively believed that the nefarious activities of Planned Parenthood couldn’t get any worse. After all, what could be worse than ripping innocent, fully-formed babies from the wombs of their mothers? We should have known better. It turned out that Planned Parenthood could, in fact, come up with something worse: selling off the body parts of aborted babies. The atrocities being committed by Planned Parenthood illustrate in the starkest of terms why liberals find it necessary to subscribe to the philosophy of moral relativism. Any person who believes in absolute right and wrong could not justify abortion much less the selling of body parts. Only those who believe that right and wrong are relative terms and that each individual must decide what is right for him or herself could possible justify a practice that is reminiscent of the medical experiments of Nazi Dr. Josef Mengele performed at Hitler’s death camps in World War II. Moral relativism is a fundamental tenet of the secular humanist’s worldview. It claims right and wrong are culturally-based and defined by the needs of man; thus they are subject to the determination of the individual. If man is god, as is the case with advocates of moral relativism, then man decides right and wrong. In layman’s terms, moral relativism means that there are no absolutes; individuals can decide for themselves what is right and what is wrong…Moral relativists tend to be secular humanists or atheists who believe in the evolutionary view that life on earth is the result of countless cosmic accidents…The left likes to portray moral relativism as being a neutral concept, but in reality moral relativism is anything but neutral. On the contrary, it is hostile to morality and destructive to society…Secular humanism is the religion of the left. It has its own bible, the Humanist Manifesto, its own ethical construct, moral relativism, and its own god, man.”

“Hey, we all know the only thing liberals love better than killing babies is getting paid to kill babies, but they used to at least try to hide the blood on their hands. Remember when liberals used to say that they believed abortion should be “safe, legal and rare?” Sure, it wasn’t true, but at least they felt obliged to say it to keep from looking bloodthirsty. Then we moved on to, “We support abortion anytime, anywhere for any reason.” Your baby has an issue? Abort her! You got a girl and you wanted a boy? Abort her! Is the pregnancy going to ruin your selfies when you go on a vacation to the beach later this year? Abort her!”
“Whereas the Nazis were responsible for the wholesale murder of more than 6 million Jews, those today who support the practice of abortion homicide are no less complicit in the systematic slaughter of 55-million-and-counting equally precious human beings post   Roe v. Wade. The parallels are undeniable and the science unequivocal. Murder is murder whatever stage of development the human victim.”
"Despite Leftist merchants of evil using big words and arrogant condescension to convince us that morality is relative, we instinctively know some things are good and some things are bad. Equally annoying is Leftists' air of superiority -- claiming to care more than us commoners about equality, saving the planet and all life; their evil intentions hidden beneath a shroud of faux compassion."
Despite what we have been taught, violence does not always imply the use of physical weapons such as guns, knives, bombs, or clubs. It is possible to be violent simply by using words. Our nation, once purposed to be modeled after God’s Kingdom has been stolen from us. We have been violated, not with physical weapons, but by the use of words, laws, ridicule, and indoctrination… The kingdom of darkness does its work in the dark. They have seized every one of our institutions without firing a shot. They have used their weapons of lies and deceit to violate and destroy all that is good. They have invaded every Godly institution, bombarded us with lies, and stolen the future of our children and grandchildren…The haters of God have become emboldened. They have no conscience, no mercy, and no remorse.
"(A)s long as a policy makes you feel good then to heck with the Constitution. Liberal policies are often framed in this emotional manner to skirt what they have portrayed as restrictive constitutional laws. Unfortunately, emotion does not provide an orderly rule of law with established statutes that actually provide equal treatment to everyone. Breaking the law by not enforcing the law does not provide the warm fuzzies in the end."
“Evidence from three studies reveals a critical difference in self-control as a function of political ideology. Specifically, greater endorsement of political conservatism (versus liberalism) was associated with greater attention regulation and task persistence.”

“The left has been feeding us well organized, well branded propaganda for decades – and not just concerning the same-sex marriage issue. Liberals have been working to tear down the traditional Biblical family on all sides. They’ve been successful in doing so through entertainment and education…The public schools in America have spent decades revising our history and changing our origins so they could promote socialism and morally bankrupt ideas…(H)omosexual couples are celebrated and portrayed as more loving and “normal” than the hateful, idiot Christians or heterosexual married couples, daily television has flooded us with liberal thinking. Some of it has been covert and subtle, while more and more of it is belligerently in our faces…The public schools in America have spent decades revising our history and changing our origins so they could promote socialism and morally bankrupt ideas.”
When the Pope preaches Global Warming liberals have no problem with their imagined Constitutional “separation of church and state.” Likewise, preaches compromising with evolutionism are beloved. A major evolutionism propagandist, Eugenie Scott said, “I have found that the most effective allies for evolution are people of the faith community. One clergyman with a backward collar is worth two biologists at a school board meeting any day!”

In the Real World, Not Hollywood, the Left Is Close-Minded, and the Right Allows Dissent
“Political Correctness” was just beginning (2005) to take root, but most of us had no idea how dangerous liberalism really was. In fact, we laughed at the liberals. We chuckled at their crazy assertions knowing full well that their crazy ideas would never gain much traction in the American mind. That was back when common sense was a little more common…At its very root “Political Correctness” is a weapon of destruction . But actually, it destroys by deconstruction. It breaks down a culture by destroying the very pillars upon which a society is built. Since at least the 1960’s we have experienced an aggressive deconstruction of the American society by the cultural Marxists…All of the foundations must be destroyed. No matter where you live, the public school district in your community is responsible for the condition of this country. The public schools teach the positions of the cultural Marxists.
Social justice” has become as much a part of the liberal narrative in America as “choice.” Not surprisingly, neither concept actually means what the dictionary says it means. Both are just examples of the left’s nefarious habit of co-opting positive labels for their negative beliefs. Liberals know that if they call their foundational beliefs what they really are, the general public will be so offended by them that opposition will mount. Call abortion “murder” or “infanticide” or homosexuality “sodomy” and the practices sound much less attractive than what liberals call them: “choice” and “gay.”… Socialism is the preferred governance structure of social-justice advocates.
20 Questions You’re Not Supposed To Ask In America Today

"Isn't a looter a poor man's progressive, doing in a rough and small-scale way what progressives like Obama do smoothly and systematically?" (Dinesh D'Souza)
Sent from a friend who found it on Facebook:

“The USA is a sick and diseased place. If you think politics can turn things around, then you have no clue. This is not a political problem; it is a cultural and spiritual problem. Want to find the root cause (other than original sin)? Look in the pulpits of those things we still call "churches." Look on the lists of church elders and deacons. And finally, look in the pews themselves . . . and perhaps in the mirror.

“As a Protestant, I dare not speak for the Orthodox and Roman Catholic churches. But I can speak with some knowledge about the evangelical church in America. And to keep it simple, the world is leading the church around by the nose and the church has no answer for the world.

“God has promised to keep a faithful remnant through bad times, and these appear to be bad times (though perhaps not as bad as some other points in history). If you are indeed part of that remnant, be ready to stand your ground and be very unpopular. Be ready for persecution as well.

“Prepare yourself in all ways. As part of that preparation, I would suggest dispensing with the false hope that the old America you remember can be restored. It is gone. In fact, even back in the mid-20th century, a time most of us old folks remember fondly, the seeds of destruction were already beginning to sprout. Now, they have become noxious weeds that have overtaken the garden and choked out the good plants.

“You cannot elect enough ‘conservative Republicans,’ Mr. and Mrs. America, to overcome a culture in which the question of whether murder, theft, deceit, and perversion are evil is a matter of personal opinion rather than moral objectivity. Once the consensus of what is evil and what is good is lost, then there is nothing to hold society together. And America has reached that point in 2015; it is truly an open-air insane asylum masquerading as a country.


“(S)lavery is by no means peculiar, odd or unusual. It was common among ancient peoples such as the Egyptians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Hittites, Greeks, Persians, Armenians and many others. Large numbers of Christians were enslaved during the Ottoman wars in Europe. White slaves were common in Europe from the Dark Ages to the Middle Ages. It was only after A.D. 1600 that Europeans joined with Arabs and Africans and started the Atlantic slave trade…While slavery constitutes one of the grossest encroachments on human liberty, it is by no means unique or restricted to the Western world or United States, as many liberal academics would have us believe. Much of their indoctrination of our young people, at all levels of education, paints our nation's founders as racist adherents to slavery, but the story is not so simple.”
“It's not at all uncommon to watch a college basketball game and see that 90 to 100 percent of the starting five players are black. Most of a team's white players are sidelined and warming the bench…One can understand the lack of concern for diversity in professional sports, where it's just about money. But one is left flummoxed by the lack of diversity in college sports. After all, you can't listen to any college president or provost speak for more than a few minutes without hearing the word "diversity" or "inclusiveness" drop from his lips. Colleges spend hundreds of millions of dollars on diversity…But in what appears to be the height of deviousness and deceit, these administrators allow sports, the most visible part of most colleges, to be the least diverse and least inclusive. One has to wonder just how serious academicians are about diversity and inclusion.”
“By and large, police are having lethal interactions not with the nation’s total population but with its criminal population. The elephant in the room, the fundamental to which we must never refer, is propensity toward criminality. It is simply a fact that blacks, and particularly young black men, engage in lawless conduct, very much including violent conduct, at rates (by percentage of population) significantly higher than do other racial or ethnic groups. This is not a matter of conjecture. Crime gets reported by victims; the police don’t invent it, they investigate it.”  
“White Republicans in Congress championed civil rights legislation in the 1960s. Still, blacks flock to the Democrats… Democrats have been hiding the truth for years. "They don't want us to know and to learn [for example] that the Ku Klux Klan was really the military enforcement arm of the Democratic Party," he explains, "who sought not simply to kill black people but to eliminate any threat that would allow political equality – which is why there were more white people lynched by the KKK than black people.”
“For blacks, out-of-wedlock births have gone from 25 percent in 1965 to 73 percent in 2015. For whites, from less than 5 percent to over 25 percent. And for Hispanics, out-of-wedlock births have risen to 53 percent. What happened to fathers? The answer is found in a basic law of economics: If you subsidize undesirable behavior you will get more undesirable behavior. In 1949, the nation’s poverty rate was 34 percent. By 1965, it was cut in half, to 17 percent -- all before President Lyndon Johnson’s so-called War on Poverty. But after that war began in 1965, poverty began to flat line. From 1965 until now, the government has spent over $20 trillion to fight poverty.”
“Why are liberals so quick to drop the “R” (racism) bomb on people who disagree with them?... Liberals understand that nobody wants to be called a racist. Consequently, they use the term like a club to suppress opposing points of view. When liberals cannot debate a point of contention on the basis of facts, logic, or reason, they simply opt for the nuclear option and drop the ‘R’ bomb on opponents.”
“Whites have been on the left's hit list for decades.  Disguising their assault on whites, the left portray themselves as champions of black empowerment.  They claim that blacks are victims of racist America, despite elephant-in-the-living-room evidence proving otherwise.  Meanwhile, the left is engaged in a shock-and-awe attack on whites, with public schools teaching kids to feel guilty for being white (white privilege).  “
RACE BAITERS: Don’t Want You To Know This About Black History

1. America’s first black military officers served the Confederacy.
2. The first legally recognized slave owner in American history was black
3. Free blacks commonly owned black slaves in the antebellum South.
4. In 1860 the largest slave owner in South Carolina was William Ellison, a black plantation owner.
5. Without black African slave owners there would have been no slavery in America.
6. Blacks, including slaves, were allowed to own property in the antebellum South.”
(7 more)
“Black privilege manifests itself in numerous forms:
>Blacks have the right to take pride in their race. Whites don't.
>Blacks can never be racist. Whites are always racist, even if they don't try to be.
>Blacks get to play the race card. Whites don't.

There are many more.

(Jesse Lee) “ Peterson, the author of the new book “The Antidote,” suggests himself that blacks turn away from anger and toward self-reliance and stronger moral values. However, he warns the media is deliberately steering blacks away from such actions and is instead providing the motivation for violent attacks on whites. He also alleges there is a double standard in how the media report racial violence and in how it ascribes political significance to certain crimes.”
“The left has consistently proven that they have little regard for the sanctity of human life. This is most evident not only in their incessant support for abortion, but in the way they have allowed black Americans to adopt the victim mentality that has destroyed so many of their lives. Through the constant race baiting and deliberate, but subtle attempts to whip up anger among the black communities, the left has done little but alienate these people, push back racial relations and turn many young men into hate filled, cold blooded murderers. The inner city ghettos, governed mostly by Democrats who make promises they have no intentions, or means of keeping, bear witness to an unprecedented rate of senseless murder in the black community, and the left does next to nothing to stop it. ”
“Like formerly fat people who continue to see an obese person in the mirror, Democrats have ingrained in blacks that they are victims of an “eternally” racist America; despite glaring evidence proving otherwise…Sadly, there are a large number of black Americans whose brains are entombed in a victim mindset; impenetrable by the truth. ”
"For those who refuse to be bullied by Leftist media types and activists who foment violence, read  White Girl Bleed A Lot: The Return of Racial Violence to America and How the Media Ignore It , by Colin Flaherty, an author who knows about backlash, censorship and false accusations of racism.  He also knows a lot about the war on whites, and reports on it…And what explains this epidemic of black-on-white violence?  It is simple really: social order breaks down when families fail, when children are born out of wedlock, when children are fatherless, raised on the street, taught to hate, and when adults encourage bigotry, racism, hate crimes and violence, especially when presidents and attorneys general and so-called pastors and  educators   teach the same. The pervasive and forever attack on the family and traditional morality has practically destroyed common courtesy.  Unchecked, the sin nature, what the founders call “the passions”, eventually create mob rule, the law of the jungle, mayhem…The real tragedy in all this: the vast majority of blacks, whites and Hispanics want nothing to do with the race war now sponsored by the Democrats and their Leftist accomplices."
"Ever notice how the secular left conveniently omits the fact that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a devout Christian minister? While, historically, there have certainly been apostate “Christians” who, in the name of Christ, have abused and taken out of context certain biblical passages to support slavery, segregation, racism and other evils – it has been, without fail, true Christians, that is, Bible-believing Christians of every race, color and creed, who have led the charge in defense of all legitimate human (and civil) rights."
“The Democrats love to blame America for being a racist nation and seize any opportunity they can to exploit the impoverished conditions many blacks find themselves living in. In fact, we have seen that the left will go to any lengths necessary to give the impression that they are seeking to correct a societal wrong. The problem is the left is primarily responsible for these impoverished conditions. This was the point of Critical Projection theory . The left, in an effort to hide all of their failures, project their own racist attitudes onto Republicans and Conservatives so that they may be able to retain the illusion that they are the savior of poor inner city (mostly black) communities. All throughout history it was in fact, the Democrat party that was responsible for most of America’s racist history. The Democrats were the primary slave owners, the Democrats formed the Klu Klux Klan, and the Democrats were responsible for Jim Crow segregation laws.”  
(Inner city race riots are) “not about an American failure, it is about a Democrat failure. And ask yourself, who were the ones who developed the concept of urban economic empowerment zones — as opposed to the ones who have produced urban depraved enslavement zones?”
That vision (us against them) is nowhere more clearly expressed than in attempts to automatically depict whatever social problems exist in ghetto communities as being caused by the sins or negligence of whites, whether racism in general or a "legacy of slavery" in particular. Like most emotionally powerful visions, it is seldom, if ever, subjected to the test of evidence. The "legacy of slavery" argument is not just an excuse for inexcusable behavior in the ghettos. In a larger sense, it is an evasion of responsibility for the disastrous consequences of the prevailing social vision of our times, and the political policies based on that vision, over the past half century.”


“God’s word admonishes Christians in 2 Corinthians 6:14 not to be “unequally yoked together with unbelievers” (KJV). That directive is not singularly referencing a marriage relationship. In the same verse is the question: “What fellowship has righteousness with unrighteousness?” God’s word asks: “What concord hath Christ with Be’lial?” (2 Corinthians 6:18 KJV) God’s word directs us to: “Come out from among them, and be ye separate … to touch not the unclean thing” (2 Corinthians 6:17 KJV). There’s no equivocating; there’s no ambiguity. What part of God’s word do people who claim to be Christians not understand? Christian children do not belong in the sewers of animalistic pagan debauchery and intellectual abuse masquerading as public academic institutions. The church of God has a mission field right in front of it, and the people thereof are wasting money, time and resources trying to conform Satan to Christ likeness. It is time to stop wasting God’s money and talent in an arena that offers no return on investment.”
“There’s nothing in the Bible that says we must dedicate ourselves to maintaining a government-run education system at any cost. My first responsibility is to my family, not to the community or the school system or my kid’s classmates. I will never put the interests of ‘the system’ above that of my own children. Whether ‘the system’ lives or dies is not my concern. My family is my concern. I have an obligation to them, not to the local superintendent… if I did put my kids in ‘the system’ for the sake of ‘the system,’ I’m not the one making the sacrifice. I’m forcing my kids to make it. At least face what you’re doing. When it comes down to it, the burden of public schooling is something your child will have to shoulder, not you…As much as I’d like to keep them shielded from the evils of the world forever, I know that I can do no such thing. The question is not   whether  our kids will be exposed to this or that depravity, but   when and how and  in what context?  Are you prepared to trust the school’s judgment on when Junior is ready to learn about concepts like ‘transgenderism’? Do you trust their judgment on how he learns about it, and what he’s told about it?...when a kid is sent to public school, he’s expected to navigate and survive and thrive in a hostile, confusing, amoral environment, basically untethered from his parents, 6–8 hours a day, 5 days a week, 9 months a year, for 12 years…They aren’t equipped, they aren’t ready, they aren’t strong enough, and they will get eaten alive.”
You cannot understand K-12 in the USA unless you consider what the educational leaders have been trying to do. They want to create a new socialist child and build a brave new world. If necessary, they'll accomplish this goal one dumbed-down, brainwashed kid at a time.”
“Liberals spend a lot of time bitterly complaining about “big” stuff. They hate “big pharma.” They hate “big business.” Yet they embrace “big education” with wholehearted fervor.”
“When man makes laws that are in direct conflict with God’s LAW, then man will, at some point, reap what he sows , and the crop will not be good.   For example, man has made laws saying parents must send their children to school, and that same government, with taxpayer dollars, provides such a school.  Now, tell me, what can be more ridiculous than sending a young boy to a government school where he learns he can become a girl if he so chooses? The really sad part about this situation is that Christian leaders are supposed to be purveyors of biblical truth, if anyone is, yet in the face of reality, they abandon truth and accept the lie that government run schools are acceptable places for our children to receive discipleship training for about 30 hours each week.”
“To accommodate less college-ready students, colleges must water down their curricula, lower standards and abandon traditional tools and topics.”
“Those who are strong advocates for Christian schooling of our nation’s children have heard different reasons from parents as to why they don’t take their children out of public schools to place them in a Christian environment. One such reason is, “But our children attend a good public school.” My response is this; Occasionally you will find a good biscuit in a garbage can, but that’s not the place to go looking for a good biscuit…Kids who spend 30 hours a week in a public school environment in America today will no doubt absorb much of the stench in that environment in much the same way that a lonely biscuit in a garbage pail will take on the rotting odor found there.”
The world is in a mess, America is in rapid decline, including politics, government, the culture and most certainly the public (government run) school system. Those who are strong advocates for Christian schooling of our nation’s children have heard different reasons from parents as to why they don’t take their children out of public schools to place them in a Christian environment. One such reason is, “But our children attend a good public school.” My response is this; Occasionally you will find a good biscuit in a garbage can, but that’s not the place to go looking for a good biscuit.
(T)they (liberals) want all the rest of us to not only feel frightened from following their example in exercising independent judgment about what constitutes a good education, they want to force all the rest of us to do as they say, not as they do. They have used the police power of government and our own tax dollars to herd our children into separate and unequal system of schooling from the one they have enjoyed.
Conservative commentator, Lee Duigon says it well. “…the same educators who teach your children that there’s no such thing as “right” or “wrong” go into screaming conniptions about 'hate' and 'bigotry' the moment you suggest, for example, that marriage consists of a man and a woman? Their whole 'your truth, my truth' thing goes out the window, and you are an enemy of the people and must be destroyed—or at least 'rehabilitated'… It looks like the idea behind this is to empty the children of all moral beliefs before they enter college. There the educators can fill them up with strong, even vehement, opinions—which, by some academic hocus-pocus, are transformed into the only 'true' or 'right' opinions, the only ones allowed—on social justice, 'gay' rights, the iniquity of White Privilege, Saving the Planet from Income Inequality and Climate Change, or Becoming a Citizen of the World Because Being an American is so Un-cool.

"It’s a really neat trick, as they go from ‘no opinions can be true’ to ‘these are the only right opinions, and woe unto you if we catch you holding any others!’ It’s better than alchemy. The kids come in with 'your truth, my truth, no truth' and come out getting extra credit for spouting stuff like 'There are no illegal immigrants, only illegal borders’… The purpose of public education is, as it has always been, to replace the Christian religion with pagan worship of the state and the anointed experts who operate the state. It is not necessary to initiate students into the full mysteries of secular humanism. What the experts are after is obedience. It’s easy to rule over shallow, ignorant, and self-centered people.”
“(T)the thing that never ceases to amaze me is how morally stunted and ethically underdeveloped our students are, how utterly unable to make even obvious moral distinctions, and how completely uninterested in differentiating between virtue and vice… They are smart enough to realize that legitimizing the bad choices of others means that they are entitled to the same legitimization for their own bad choices as well, a system of mutually beneficial amorality in which the self-interested embrace of tolerance is enough not only to absolve their own sins, but also to confer upon them a kind of active virtue that grants immunity from the moral and spiritual consequences of their choices…  (A)nyone who has spent meaningful time in our institutions of learning knows just how seriously teachers and academics take their liberal worldviews. If the goal is merely to divorce all meaning and belief from the humanities, then doing so across the board would produce a kind of level playing field, however degraded the resulting view of mankind. But the liberal post-modernism and moral relativity that dominate our schools seek to root out traditional values and meanings in order to supplant them with the liberal, materialist creeds of academics — belief-systems every bit as faith-based as those they seek to remove. Despite the obvious contradiction and hypocrisy, liberal academics proceed blithely down this intellectually tortured path… Nevertheless, academics today proceed religiously down this path with all the conviction of Saul before he hit the road to Damascus. As G. K. Chesterton observed trenchantly, ‘When people stop believing in God, they don’t believe in nothing — they believe in anything’… We have reached the point in Western education where politically leftist approaches to culture have become institutionally sanctioned, unquestioningly normative, and zealously guarded: They alone offer students a legitimate position from which to analyze and critique culture. The dominance of such worldviews — to the detriment of free inquiry and the perversion of the educational mission — accounts for the overwhelming liberal bias in American education, the uniformly leftist sentiments of faculties and administrators, and the impressive success of schools in churning out factually illiterate, technically incompetent, but politically liberal and increasingly activist graduates. As Abraham Lincoln observed with alarming prescience, “The philosophy of the classroom in one generation, is the philosophy of government in the next.”
The United States has a rich history of which all Americans can be proud. It’s not perfect, but it is very good. America’s record among the community of nations is a sterling example of what people of good will can do when they enjoy the blessings of liberty, freedom, and self-determination. But liberals don’t see things this way . To them America’s history is a shameful record characterized by military adventurism, imperialism, and exploitation. Most liberals can find little good to say about America—past or present—and they use our nation’s public schools, colleges, and universities to pass their disdain on to successive generations of susceptible young people.
“Our nation’s education system has been literally destroyed in an effort to indoctrinate our children into the tenets of leftist philosophy. We once had the finest education system in the world and now our children can’t think their way out of a paper bag. We are falling   below international averages in math and other academic areas   as educators focus more on teaching “social justice” and rabid anti American values as opposed to real academic endeavors. Our students are being trained to be social advocates for Democrat issues while being told the values their nation stands for are racist, sexist, oppressive and homophobic.”
"The chief culprit in making sure Americans are no longer capable of self-government is the public schools. Monopolies are unhealthy anyway, but educational monopolies run by the government ensure that the only thing taught to pupils is approved by, and supportive of, the government agenda. Schools no longer teach. They indoctrinate, rewrite and lie about history, mock and distort religious beliefs, and promote a single progressive agenda. They discourage self-control and encourage hedonism (since, after all, any “mistakes” can be “fixed” by Planned Parenthood). Their goal is to achieve a massive universal groupthink populace incapable of questioning the government, much less governing themselves."


“Consider the current conversation on abortion, for example. How often are media sources actually willing to discuss what abortion is? Pro-lifers are portrayed as wild-eyed religious fanatics or fundamentalist throwbacks trying to control female sexuality, while abortion supporters are portrayed as liberty-loving reproductive rights warriors. But imagine if a newspaper simply printed photographs of the human being in the womb at each stage of development, from conception until birth, and asked questions about when it was ethical to end that life? Or imagine if journalists confronted politicians with the fact that abortion often involves doctors tearing the limbs from the bodies of pre-born children, and asked if this was a humane response to a crisis pregnancy?... The abortion industry has progressive politicians, the mainstream media, and much of academia running cover for their barbarism.
“Truth is that Planned Parenthood is one of the biggest violators of human rights, especially the right to life. All their talk about fighting for women and women’s rights is just a screen so they can make money doing what they love doing best – killing babies.  Planned Parenthood is simply the most efficient baby-killing machine that has ever been invented. It’s time for everyone, especially women, to realize this. Such an evil machine should never be supported, and it certainly should not be funded by tax dollars. It’s time to abort Planned Parenthood, for good.”
“Planned Parenthood has since 1970 performed 7 million abortions, comfortably surpassing Hitler according to its own annual reports,” he wrote. “Planned Parenthood has amassed a Third Reich-style death count completely legally and while pocketing half a billion dollars a year to do so.”
“Masked by the false narrative that women ought to be able to do what they wish with their own bodies, the pro-aborts are blind to the fact that the body growing within a woman’s womb is a completely different body, given life from God above at the moment of conception. The child has a different circulatory system, different blood, and different DNA, making arguments in favor of 'women’s reproductive rights' anti-science, not to mention profoundly brutal.

“Saline abortions — in which the child can be viewed on an ultrasound thrashing in immense pain as her skin burns — causes no sympathy from the pro-aborts. Nor do suction aspiration abortions induce a heartfelt tear, where the baby can be viewed (again, via ultrasound) trying to move away from the powerful vacuum that rips off her legs and arms before her body and head is crushed.

“A D&E abortion is one in which the doctor uses instruments to break bones and tear off the arms and legs of a baby who no doubt is screaming at the obvious pain that would induce at 20 to 32 weeks of age.

“No problem, say the pro-aborts, there is an uptick in post-conception pill use, which supposedly kills the child at a much more acceptable phase of life, between five and nine weeks. Only, the pill starves the child to death over a long period of time.”
“Forty-two million times a year world-wide, we kill our own sons or daughters while they are still blissfully unaware, developing in what should be the safest place on earth—under their mothers’ hearts. We get so used to hearing about abortion that sometimes we forget just how radical, and how bizarre, and how   unnatural  abortion is. Think about it for a moment—women are hiring strangers to use tools to force their way into their uteruses, and then use what are basically vacuum cleaner hoses and medical pliers to pull, pulverize, and pry their babies from their bodies. This is not healthcare…Let me lay out another scenario. Suppose…(We) were allowing baboons to pry open the cervixes of pregnant lionesses and use curved sticks to hook the unwanted cubs by the eyeholes and drag them out to die in the sun. What would scientists think? An easy question to answer: They would think that something was dreadfully wrong, because something   would  be dreadfully wrong. A species that regularly facilitates the killing of its own offspring—the Darwinian instinct towards reproduction in reverse! They would soon discover that evolution cannot explain such thing. Only Evil can .”  
Do you know why I hate the slogan “my body, my choice”? Because, behind this empowering façade, there is an elitist mentality that says only a few people, only a few members of society, only a few women should truly have a right to choose. And I am not included in those few. And if you are pro-life, neither are you. 
"Planned Parenthood
is more than an abortion provider and dispenser of contraception. Its more potent role is as a vivid cultural symbol -- to both supporters and detractors of the ongoing cultural contest between what is often called traditional morality around sexuality and the sanctity of human life and modern mores that extol abortion as essential to ensuring women's equality…A strong message has been sent that not only is Planned Parenthood potentially above the law, but that concerted efforts to discredit the organization will be met with criminal charges or investigations against those seeking to undermine the organization."
"Leftists are fanatical about protecting the rain forest.
They say it may hold a cure for AIDS. And yet, most Leftists are obsessed with killing babies. Even after a baby survives a failed abortion, Leftists demand that medical staff let the baby die. Amazingly, a law had to be passed to end this barbaric practice. Why haven't Leftists considered the possibility that the doctor or researcher with a cure for cancer, AIDS and other diseases may have been among the 55 million babies aborted in America since 1973?  Leftists are defending PP black marketing baby body parts. And yet, these same Leftists are tearfully outraged over the death of a furry animal and fight to their death to protect trees and imprisoned cop killers. There is something seriously wrong in people who possess such a mindset."
"Unlike the 58 million unborn babies killed by abortions since 1973, death-row inmates deserve to die. Why don’t we just send them to a surgeon right now? Almost everyone who supports Planned Parenthood and abortion will undoubtedly be on board. Granted, there will always be a few hand wringers on the left, but most liberals are truly ruthless.

"When society’s killers literally begin paying for their crimes, even some abortion-supporting hand wringers will have to wise up. Selling the organs of murderers could help pay for the cost of imprisoning the dregs of society — or we could simply ensure that these specific organs are used to provide indigent Americans on the organ waiting list with the part they need. Why in the world haven’t we been harvesting the body parts of death-row criminals before now?

"Isn’t all of this just common sense? If hand-wringing liberals are appalled by my swift idea, couldn’t we just call executions 'abortions'? I mean criminals cannot survive in a jail cell on their own, right? Perhaps the Supreme Court could make the new definition official. That ought to satisfy some of the sanctimonious bleeding hearts on the left."
When iberals set out to prove that conservatives are hypocrites, they will generally point out that many of the same people who are most opposed to abortions turn around and support capital punishment. In doing so, the liberals merely confirm they lack anything even faintly resembling a moral compass. After all, who but a leftist would ever equate the life of an innocent baby with that of a cold-blooded sadist?... suspect, based on the evidence, that a sizable number of those on the Left would favor aborting 17 and 18-year-olds if the mothers sensed conservative tendencies cropping up in their offspring.

"(L)iberals have done a great job of garnering influence over the legal system. In the old days, you could appeal a death sentence only if you came up with new evidence showing that the cops had perjured themselves, the prosecutor had withheld evidence beneficial to the defendant or, in those rarest of instances, when someone else confessed to the crime. But these days, the defense lawyers merely have to dig up a liberal judge who’ll grant them one stay of execution after another while he killer lives on and on, outliving his victim by 20 or 30 years, often hanging on until a liberal governor decides to commute his sentence. In the meantime, because of all the stalling tactics, a backlog builds up on Death Row, so that those opposed to capital punishment can argue that it would be barbaric to execute hundreds of individuals. What they invariably neglect to mention is that the backlog of sadists and serial killers only exists because these assorted shysters and sob sisters prevented the executions from taking place in a timely fashion.”


“(T)o say these similarities demonstrate common descent ignores another possibility. While a common feature may be due to common ancestry, it may instead be due to a common design strategy. Think of cars. A Jaguar and a Mustang share many features — four wheels, rubber tires, two axles, windshield wipers, lights, gas engines. That doesn’t mean the Mustang evolved from the Jaguar. No, designers reuse design features proven to work for specific engineering needs… to say these similarities demonstrate common descent ignores another possibility. While a common feature may be due to common ancestry, it may instead be due to a common design strategy… Someone will object that the design hypothesis “isn’t science.” But that just dresses the question-begging up in a lab coat. It’s still question-begging. And it’s no way to advance knowledge. Science should be about truth-seeking and evidence .”
Imagine that an astronaut returns to Earth after a trip to deep space, and reports that he has discovered a planet whose inhabitants are so intelligent that — a long time ago — they succeeded in designing a very primitive car which carried its own completely automated automobile factory around in its trunk. Every once in a while, the trunk opens and out pops a new little automobile, which slowly grows into a full-sized car, complete with its own fully automated auto factory in the trunk. The cars on this planet continue to reproduce, and make nearly perfect copies of themselves, generation after generation.”
“Scott Turner tells the story about the Christmas pony. As a gift for a child who wants a pony, a poor family could afford only a pile of horse manure. Traipsing downstairs on Christmas morning to behold this well-intentioned mess, the child delightedly squealed and clapped. Her parents asked her why. She answered, “Because I know there’s a pony in there somewhere.” In evaluating the coherence of Darwinian theory, Dr. Turner finds many of his fellow biologists in much the same mood. Squealing and clapping, they know there’s a coherent theory in there somewhere.”
“(T)he creation-evolution controversy in a wider context than just how species change over time. Darwinism is a package: it is a repudiation of design, and embracing of selfish pride. Darwin wanted out of Moses, Paley, and Jesus. He wanted to abandon a Creator for a creation that makes its own rules. The people who follow him, except for some dupes who don’t understand the issues and think evolution is ‘scientific,’ tend to have the same mentality. The vision of personal liberation is very attractive to people – at first. But followed to its logical conclusions, it leads to despair…”
“Evolution is a god to the science research and media culture, capable of innovation, progress, and adaptation. Evolutionists think they are pleasing Darwin by being Darwin-like the way Christians try to please God by being Christ-like. The Darwinians imbue all the attributes of God onto natural selection. They fall down and worship its omniscience and omnipotence. They might as well be singing Darwin’s praises in hymns.” (Be sure to see the hymns.)
The Theory of Evolution is not just about biological evolution. It is part of a grand unified theory that seeks to explain everything (except things that it can’t explain, which it ignores). It runs briefly as follows: First came the Big Bang. Subatomic particles flew in all directions, coalesced into atoms and into molecules and stars. Planets formed, then oceans, and then life came about by chemical inadvertence. Evolution produced trilobites, dinosaurs, mammals, and us. In the popular version, though not in the scientific, evolution produces ongoing betterment. It is not particularly plausible. As someone said, evolution writ large is the belief that a large cloud of hydrogen will eventually turn into Manhattan. But, like a religion, it provides an overarching explanation of origins–the Big Bang–and destiny–we are getting better and better–and gives us a sense of understanding the world. In this it serves the purposes of a religion and is treated as such by its adherents. They react to questioning with anger and they see their hated opponents as Creationists–that is, adherents of another religion.”
“Both the Humanist (read “liberal”—Karl) and the Marxist base their attitudes toward history and the future on the belief that evolution is a fact. Accordingly, all of life is on a grand march forward, progressing toward perfection (Marxism makes doubly sure of this progress by postulating a near¬divine, teleological dialectic that moves men through various means of production toward the most desirable society). This belief that evolution virtually guarantees the eventual perfection of life is as old as Darwin, who suggested that since "natural selection works solely by and for the good of each being, all corporeal and mental endowments will tend to progress towards perfection."

“Clearly, Marxist and Humanist worldviews offer incentives for their faithful. Not only do they promise an "inevitable" ascent into paradise; they also promise a heaven without the uncomfortable concept of a holy, just God. Man does not have to be responsible for his actions; he can still achieve paradise! This belief about history and the future provides the incentive for men and women to cling to worldviews that are otherwise untenable.” (Understanding the Times, 1991, David A. Nobel, pg. 837)

“Evolutionists are organized like Islamic terrorists. There is no central evolutionist in command upon whom the entire movement rests. Instead, there is a unifying ideology to which they all subscribe. There are evolutionist cells on universities, and school boards, and on TV, and in print journalism, which move in unison without discernable lines of communication to advance that ideology. Evolutionists act like fish. One fish turns, and the whole school turns the same way.  There is no single individual leader. It is a group belief by some that the theory of evolution is true. There are prominent individuals in the evolutionary camp, but no official leader. Furthermore, communication exists between individuals in the group, but it is distributed over multiple communication channels (Internet, TV, radio, magazines, etc.) and therefore impossible to disrupt…Belief in evolution is fundamental to a person’s attitude toward the meaning of life. Do we exist because we were created on purpose and given a responsibility to live in a certain way? Or are we here by accident and can choose to do whatever we want to do without answering to a higher authority? That’s why they feel compelled to prove their unscientific evolutionary beliefs are correct.”
“If you took out all instances of assuming evolution through imagination, suggestion and speculation, the evidence for Darwinian evolution would collapse in a heap.”
If only evolutionists would quit spinning their theory for a momen
t, read a serious critic, and answer him. If only! One of the most striking features of the Darwin "debate" is the signal refusal of Darwin's defenders to register scientific critiques and offer a worthy reply…Darwinian explanations are not just unlikely, merely implausible, but "physically impossible."… The design intuition is suppressed by many of us, unnaturally so, and that is the dirty little secret of evolutionary biology. In a nutshell, evolution can "fiddle," but it cannot "invent…Invention, whether of an omelet or an orca, requires knowledge. We recognize that folding paper to devise an origami crane required knowhow, but lightly reject the same requirement in a living crane, because of "natural selection"?

“If all you read are the headlines at major science sites, you are being tricked when it comes to evolution . They regularly announce that some evolutionary mystery has been solved, but then the details down below don’t show that. The headline promises a scientific explanation, in the form, ‘How the [whatever] got its [whatzit],’ but then all you read is a Kipling-like just-so story. Reporters and journals seem preoccupied with making Darwin look good at all costs. Below are some examples of the Darwin media racket at work. … (A) true believer can make a Darwin mountain out of the slightest of molehills.”
“If all we had was the science there would be no basis for believing the species have spontaneously arisen, much less that such an idea is a fact. But evolution is not a typical scientific theory. In spite of the consistent failure of fundamental scientific predictions, there remains no doubt amongst evolutionists that evolution is a fact. Its high standing is underwritten by extremely powerful contrastive proofs which render its scientific puzzles less crucial. Those puzzles are interpreted as research questions, not challenges to the fact of evolution. That fact, for evolutionists, has already been established by the philosophy and theology that support evolution’s contrastive reasoning. From a strictly scientific perspective, evolution is not a good theory.”
One might think scientists are above the moral evil of human sacrifice , particularly of child sacrifice. One would be mistaken to think so. The Big Science journals and their secular reporters are “all in” for sacrificing human embryos (which they call fetuses, instead of babies), to their secular god, science…They support Planned Parenthood, the abortion mill founded by the racist, eugenicist and evolutionist Margaret Sanger, even to the point of justifying the sale of baby body parts as exposed by last year’s undercover videos. While abortion is not linked to Darwinism directly, it becomes easier to justify if man is just an animal. Natural selection and survival of the fittest, furthermore, promote individual selfishness, in this case the selfishness of the mother and the “sperm donor” who put their own needs (or wants) over the life of the child inside her.”
“(T)ranshumanism is a futuristic social movement -- eugenic in nature -- that seeks to use biotech, cyber tech, and every other kind of tech to transform humans into a "post-human" species. The movement's goals are right out of a teenage boy's wish list: to live forever with superhero type powers…Transhumanism is dangerous because it sees humans as unexceptional -- and because it seeks to create a radical new moral order that can only be described as a symbiosis between social anarchy and fascistic statism…”
"Our planet isn't special… C)ountless parallel Earths exist, including exoplanets inhabited by living, even intelligent beings. When it's pointed out that the cosmos offers no evidence of life elsewhere, and that the needed conditions for life are ultra-finely tuned, the Nothing Special crowd posits a multiverse. Our universe, they explain, is nothing special. It's one of countless other universes. Ours is only unusual in having won a jackpot, at random, generating the right physical laws to allow the existence of a habitable planet…'I suck': that is the anthem of the Nothing Special movement that seeks to do away with what Wesley Smith calls human exceptionalism. Science -- junk science -- is a vehicle for the drive to wipe out the idea of mankind's special status in the world, along with the unique responsibilities that brings with it. Politics and history are other vehicles.”
To get a peer-reviewed paper published in a science journal, “(T)he god of Natural Selection must be appeased (if you want your paper published), so it is de rigueur to toss an "evolved" into the discussion to get the paper past the border guards, like a forged passport. Homage must be paid."
Use “the website 'The Monkey Trial' to identify the numerous contradictions between Inherit the Wind and what actually happened in Dayton… Darwinism proceeds by adroit use of propaganda, not by rational debate about the facts of nature.”
The headline of Science Daily’s article is revealing: “Sex difference in sports interest: What does evolution say?” Where does our culture go for answers? They go to their idol,
Darwin-Baal. The Bearded Buddha is their Guiding Guru, their Delphic Oracle. “Please, Mr. Darwin, grant unto us wisdom who seek your favor. Are men and women different?” Their critics on the sidelines wag their heads, replying, “Open your eyes, idiots.”
“The discourse of name-calling is a scourge of public life today, and it's only getting worse, seen across a broad spectrum of political and scientific perspectives, with college students even more severely infected than their elders. I'm referring to the strategy of jeering at your opponents as "racist," "sexist," "denier," "anti-science," "creationist," you name it, as a substitute for addressing them on the substance of what they say.”
"Each culture has its gurus—the people in the know—who explain to the masses why things are the way they are. Darwinians provide the same function that Homer and Hesiod did for the ancient Greeks, only the Darwinians’ mythical gods are really dumb. Their gods of Mutation and Natural Selection only know two words, ' tuff Happens.' Instead of cavorting on Mt. Olympus, the Darwinian gods, and their agent spirits named 'Selection Pressure' and 'Evolutionary Force,' act blindly everywhere, doing whatever stuff the gods of Mutation and Natural Selection want to happen for the moment. When the spirits act fast, the gurus speak of 'rapid diversification.' When they don’t act at all, the gurus speak of 'evolutionary conservation.' The gurus can explain anomalies by adding new sub-plots, like 'kin selection,' without sacrificing the main plot. They hate the broad-spectrum light that exposes the story as a sham."
"Intelligent Design critics often end up playing the role of naïve theologian
: What they "seem to want is a metric with The Human Body as God Would (or Should) Have Made It at one end of the measuring stick. As Dilley and Nelson have pointed out, contemporary Darwinian evolutionary thinking borrows heavily from theology for its justification."
If it was not so funny I would cry! Look at how a highly educated True Believer in Evolutionism (TBE) describes evolution. “I use an analogy in my talks. If I give you a fully formed LEGO train, that's cool. If I give you a box of LEGOs and I shake the box, and out comes a fully formed LEGO train, that's even cooler. That's what the evolutionary argument is: this is a world that can make itself. I think that's unbelievably cool. I can look at that and think, That's amazing.”
"(E)volution is not merely a subject of neutral, disinterested intellectual inquiry.
It's a product that many advocates are out to sell to a public of largely unwilling buyers. Turning evolution into a must-have consumer good is a top priority. In that context, you don't admit up front that your theory, immediately up on hearing it, faces obvious problems of believability."
“(S)o much of the Darwin Lobby's contribution to discussions of evolution and academic freedom consists of misleading the public, that is why…Meanwhile the media, with rare exceptions, fails to take them to task for these untruths. On the contrary, NCSE (National Center for Science Education) is the go-to source for complacent journalists.”


Why don't feminists fight for Muslim women?
A former feminists saw the light and wrote. “For the feminist sect women are not the inspiration , they are prime matter in the worst sense of the term. They are convenient objects useful for the purpose of inflaming hatred against the Christian religion, hatred against men, hatred against the beauty of women, hatred against the equilibrium of families…I am a witness to the fact that today in the feminist movement women are not of any importance but serve as fuel for the fires of hatred that the feminist sect cannot allow to die.”
“Actually there really is a war on women, it’s just not the kind of war in the minds of silly television journalists and Washington elites….Unfortunately the spoiled, entitled brain washed women in the U.S. fail to see what is really going on, and it’s at their own peril.”
“Liberals originally conceived the war-on-women narrative as a strategy for creating another class of victims that could be turned into a solid and dependable voting bloc for Democrats…Like most rhetoric of the left, the war-on-women narrative is based solely on emotion and bears little or no resemblance to the facts…Democrats do not believe that women are equal in any way to men. This is why they treat them as helpless victims who require special treatment, special handling, and special protections; all of which are to be provided by a benevolent federal government controlled, of course, by the Democratic Party…”

(20) CONSERVATIVE COMPROMISE (See #7 Christianity also)

“It has been said that evil triumphs when good people do nothing . How much more does it triumph when people who profess to care about what is right and good stand idly by as outstanding people who share and champion their views are attacked for bearing witness to truth? How much more does it triumph when these proven champions are battered aside by cohorts of wickedness, with strangely enthusiastic cooperation from quarters that are purportedly opposed to their assault on the premises of America's liberty?”
Conservative in Name Only (CINO) Survey
(T)he Republican Party as we’ve known it is hanging by a thread . A house divided against itself cannot stand. Why would any sincere Christian want to be attached to anything whose figureheads use the platform you provide them to insult you with propaganda you’d expect to see from your opposition? What is to be gained by advancing the ambitions and interests of people who have now let it be known they despise you and what you stand for?

Conservatives are always on the retreat.
In fact, our constant giving of ground has created a government that no longer even follows its own laws.

“(E)verything we witness in the political arena these days is nothing but the carefully contrived work of social scientists scheming to push us towards acceptance of a global governing system. Many Americans have painfully opened their eyes to the realization that the new boss is almost always the same as the old boss, and that politicians are little more than skilled orators that know how to play on the emotions of the electorate. By now, most of us are familiar with idea that the two party system is little more than an illusion designed to keep us distracted just enough to believe that we can maybe, just maybe make a difference the next time around. The only problem is, there never is any difference and sadly, the more we allow ourselves to be fooled by this dialectical contrivance, the worse off our nation becomes.”

“Like lemmings stumbling to their political deaths, conservatives who compromise with Democrats and submit to their idiotic demands simply make a deal with the devil, supposedly to create the big tent.  In reality, they fashion their own bonds.”
Actually, “liberals” would be better used than “Democrats”


“Atheists claim that Christians force their religion on others. Yet atheistic secularism has been forcing students, military personnel, ministers and workers to adhere to their lack of belief standards or suffer the consequences. Far from learning to 'coexist,' as many bumper stickers advertise, atheist lobby groups seek nothing less than to persecute and destroy all religions except their own lack of one. Their rejection of religion is their religion and their unrelenting desire to 'convert' the rest of us is unconstitutional, intolerant and wrong."
(A) “study found that while atheists may like to think of themselves as more open-minded, they’re actually less tolerant of dissenting opinions than their religious counterparts.”…(The study) “confirmed that the religious and nonreligious each have their own particular targets of prejudice, but atheists and agnostics were generally less open to differing opinions than Christians.”
“The first thing that strikes me as I board the ‘we’re all God’s children ’ train ride is…so who needs Jesus?  If being alive makes me a child of God then that whole conversation Jesus had with Nicodemus recorded in John 3:1-21 seems kind of superfluous.  I mean, if being born ipso facto makes me a child of God then why would Jesus say ‘unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God’?  If merely being alive and being loved by Jesus punches my ticket to heaven how come ‘For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son…’ wasn’t enough?  Why did Jesus continue with the phrase ‘that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life’?  And why did Paul later say in Romans 5:6 that ‘Christ died for the ungodly’?  Who can be ungodly if all are loved by God?  Hmm…If we’re all God’s children then why did Jesus seem to believe that most people are going to hell?  What else could He have meant in the Sermon on the Mount when He said in Matthew 7:13-14…”
(Email from a friend) “ We have to realize that the things we claim to stand for, as Christians, are part of a real, spiritual battle taking place. There is a real heaven, a real earth, and real angels and fallen angels with an allegiance to God and His enemy. The battle is being fought in every classroom in our country and most of the world; the battle over the future of mankind. If there was no certain truth, and there truly was no god, then it is curious why all focus is on attacking the one true God of the Bible? These neo-humanists, who claim not to believe, see the very fabric of the foundation of man to be fought over the concept of the God of the Bible. Why is that? f those who are new age humanists, believe that we are all a part of the initial blast of creation, eternal stardust, all god and a part of god, then mindfulness should be perfectly safe for everyone, right? If Mother Earth, or Gaia is real, deserves personhood, and is the true god to honor, then why not just teach that as the one true religion? Why does any of this require attacking the god of just one religion; ours?”
"Atheists who have commandeered the term Freethought complain that Christians cannot be Freethinkers because they adhere to the Christian worldview. Yet, they commit the same alleged fallacy by adhering to atheism in disguise (or openly)."
"Atheists have caused 110 million deaths in the last hundred years. Stalin, 60 million, he was an atheist. Mao, 40 million, and he was an atheist. Pol Pot, 1.7 million, he was an atheist. Vladimir Lenin, 5 million people slaughtered, he was an atheist… They may be nice people when you meet them in the street, but you give them power to do what they want and carry out their own agendas and you're gonna find that they don't have any moral high ground to stand on 'cause they're not standing on any whatsoever…Atheism is stupidity. It's crazy. It's like being in a building and saying there's no proof there was a builder. It's like looking at a painting and saying there's no proof of a painter."
A people's religion, their faith, creates their culture, and their culture creates their civilization. And when faith dies, the culture dies, the civilization dies, and the people begin to die.”
There are “seven things that you can’t do as a moral relativist”…Follow these rules and “you’ll be free from absolutes forever! Rule #1: Relativists Can’t Accuse Others of Wrong-Doing Rule #2: Relativists Can’t Complain About the Problem of Evil Rule #3: Relativists Can’t Place Blame or Accept Praise Rule #4: Relativists Can’t Claim Anything Is Unfair or Unjust Rule #5: Relativists Can’t Improve Their Morality Rule#6: Relativists Can’t Hold Meaningful Moral Discussions Rule #7: Relativists Can’t Promote the Obligation of Tolerance"
“Instead of worshiping the Creator who made everyone, atheists have essentially chosen to worship the creature . An atheist worships (holds as the most important, respects the most, gives highest priority to, or treats as the highest authority and the source of meaning and morality) himself, or money, or sex, or a movie star, or an athlete, or the government, and so on. An atheist is an idolater just as much as someone who bows before a statue or other man-made object representing his deity… As an atheist you must believe in evolution and so you cling to a view that requires mindless matter to work miracles, such as causing life to arise from non-living materials and intelligence to come from non-intelligence.”
In 2 Peter 3:5, we are told that those who scoff about God as creator, the historical Flood, and coming judgment by fire are “willingly ignorant.” This means it is a deliberate action on their part not to believe, because they don’t want to believe. They close their eyes and cover their ears, refusing to believe the truth and actively suppressing it. So why do these who so aggressively oppose Christianity care? They care because they are desperately trying to justify their rebellion against the truth. They don’t want to admit that they are sinners in need of salvation and thus need to submit to the God who created them and owns them.
Was Jesus a Liberal? The Myth Debunked!

Leftwing ideology is a secular religion, in which men are their own gods, entitled to control, even enslave, their fellow men through the use of naked, brute force. Mao said it best: “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.” Religious faith rejects this revolting idea, and instead considers every human soul precious, and created in the image of Almighty God. That’s a real non-starter for the Left for obvious reasons.”
“Ann Coulter's 2006 book Godless: The Church of Liberalism makes the connection between liberalism and atheism, arguing that to its adherents, liberalism holds every single characteristic of a religion: an atheistic one.”
“(L)iberalism stopped being a mere political perspective and turned into a religion. I mean that literally. Liberalism now functions for substantial numbers of its adherents as a religion: an encompassing worldview that answers the big questions about life, lends significance to our daily exertions, and provides a rationale for meaningful collective action… (C)onservatives nowadays are so often demonized, even by mainstream liberals? No matter how balanced, well-reasoned, or rooted in long-established principle conservative objections to, say, affirmative action or gay marriage may be, conservatives are still likely to find themselves stigmatized as racist homophobes. By the same token, reasonable conservative ideas are regularly deemed unfit for reasoned debate.”
Men who believe themselves gods and capable of redefining reality have installed their self-worship as the official religion of the U.S., and both liberals and conservatives are part of this cult which declares men to be women, animals to be humans, and other such nonsense…(T)hey aren’t merely promoting their self-worshiping religion on all of society; they are demanding that we submit to it. Those of us who refuse are ridiculed and demonized…In short, the autotheists have made their self-worship the official state religion. So while they continue bellowing that Christians are a danger to the nation and always one step removed from establishing an official Christian theocracy, the opposite is true: we live in an autotheist theocracy with liberals and conservatives among those who support it.”

(22) ISLAM

“(W)hy do left-wing liberal apologists prefer their fictional subjective reality to factual objective reality regarding the tyranny of Muslim extremism and oppressive sharia law? Why do they ignore the xenophobia, homophobia, misogyny, supremacy, and barbaric honor killings, genital mutilation, rape, wife beatings, and overarching desire to conquer the West and impose sharia law worldwide? Why do they support the internationalized criminalization of criticism of Islam?... The Islamists, the anarchists, the left-wing liberals all have common cause to destabilize America from within – they differ only in their dreams for the final outcome. The Islamists seek world dominion, the re-establishment of the caliphate, and the imposition of sharia law worldwide. The radical Left seeks to destroy American capitalism and impose socialism. The globalist elites support both the chaos provided by the Islamists (jihadi terrorism and Muslim Brotherhood stealth jihad) and the chaos provided by Leftists Obama/Clinton (advancing Alinsky's Rules for Radicals) because a chaotic, destabilized America is vulnerable to an internationalized police force and the ultimate takeover by the globalist elites who dream of one-world government where they are the rulers of the new world order.”
“(T)he Qur’an contradicts common moral standards, and the “prophet” Muhammad is revered by Muslims as the “perfect man” to be imitated and loved. (We are talking here about a warlord with a harem, including a child bride and slave girls, and involved in multiple massacres, deceits, fierce hatreds, and revengeful actions.) A “religion”? Islam would be more accurately classified as a political/religious cult – “political” because there is no distinction between “church and state,” no possibility of voluntary subjection to any non-Islamic political power, and in fact an eschatological goal of extinguishing all other states and religions. Aside from this political emphasis, it is similar to other cults – the Branch Davidians, Peoples’ Temple, Heaven’s Gate, Unification Church, etc. The common characteristics include exclusion of non-believers, dire punishments for weak believers or those who leave…If the government recognizes some “religion” as being a cult, and if some danger to civic order is presented, the cult will not be protected by the First Amendment.”  
“That Islam is ‘peace and tolerance’ is the most popular lie in the world today. Intellectuals in the West who defame Christ parrot the most fatuous praise of Muhammad, in spite of his legacy of murder, pillage, and rape.”
“It is important to understand this core motivation of Islamic terrorists in order to identify and stop them. If we continue to characterize these mass killings as events disassociated from Islamic doctrine and faith, placing the blame totally on personal hateful impulses, we will fail to identify our enemy. If we can’t identify him—if we can’t name him—we won’t know him, which means we can’t defeat him. We will also fail to recognize that this is an act of war by a group of people who have no wall of separation between the religious and the political.”
“Like Islam, communism crushed freedom at home, inspired violence abroad, and brutally repressed opposition. It was a utopian ideology, no less totalitarian than Islam. Its adherents’ efforts to erase the past and replace it with a cultural ‘Year Zero’ was remarkably similar to Muslim attempts to destroy any historic monument that isn’t connected to their religion (in other words, most of them)… Islam, like communism, is an idea. Islam is a viral meme that infects the minds of everyone from lone suicide bombers to Islamic heads of state, inspiring them to murder, repress and control…And the muslims who don’t actively identify with the most poisonous end of their ideology are perfectly happy to turn a blind eye to its horrors, as poll after poll have demonstrated…”
Ann Coulter calls it concisely
: “Even Muslim immigrants were saying, ‘I probably won't commit jihad myself, but I know some of the Muslims coming definitely will.’ It's like importing immigrants with Ebola. We feel bad for them, we know it's not their fault, but we just can't let them in. For every 100,000 Muslims we admit, we know that at least a few hundred either plan to engage in terrorism right away or can be persuaded to engage in terrorism later. Another 10,000 will send them money or help them hide.”

If they are only 0.1% of the Muslim population, how come the brutal Islamic legal system is unable to round the jihadists up and behead them in the infamous public squares of Saudi Arabia? How come moderate Muslims, the 99.9%, are unable to explain away their passivity with jihadists while those jihadists are brutalizing, honor killing and terrorizing apostates? How many jihadists have been declared apostates by Saudi Arabia? How many were beheaded in the Saudi or Iranian public squares? Why has the “moderate” largest Islamic university in the world, Al Azhar, never issued a fatwa of death against ISIS fighters and anyone who joins ISIS? They issue fatwas of death on apostates and women who have sex outside of marriage all the time, so how come none against those jihadists who supposedly ruined Islam’s reputation and caused the world to fear Muslims?... (W)e see no Muslim armies moving to Syria to rid the world of the 0.1% Muslim jihadists in ISIS. In fact, the real reason why Muslim leaders are not waging war on ISIS, even though they are capable of doing so, is because at least half of the Muslim army will defect and join ISIS…How come the 0.1% of radical Muslims is capable of causing millions of Muslim refugees, and how come rich Arab countries are not taking care of them?
“(T)he first amendment to the constitution is under a full blown assault by the radical left. Under the context that some speech may be deemed offensive, liberals have been trying to impose restrictions on our rights to free speech from our college campuses to our political debates. This is particularly true when it comes to Islam …The U.N. and the United States have remained virtually silent as there is an all out genocide being waged against Middle East Christians. Day in and day out we are bombarded with grotesque images of beheadings, and people being burned alive. Radical Islamists routinely murder people for being gay, they stone their women for not wearing burqas and they will slaughter an entire village for not being Muslim. Through these atrocities, our leaders would have us believe that raising our voices in defense of these people is criticism of Islam, and it should not be tolerated. They would have us believe that these animals are committing these horrendous acts in response to a perceived injustice, and that we should be tolerant and understanding of their perspective… Islamists do nothing to pay us the respect they demand, nor do the liberals that support them. In fact, they do nothing but mock our religious beliefs while they seek to destroy our cultural values. Christianity in America is under full assault and no one in government is coming to its defense. While liberals are demanding limits to free speech over the incident in Texas, they remained completely silent as the National Endowment of the Arts displayed a piece known as   “Piss Christ.”   This was considered a piece of art, and the liberals hid behind the first amendment when it was revealed that some found it offensive. In fact, our entire society is inundated with offensive, grotesque art from pornography, to extremely graphic movies and video games that liberals claim to be protected by the first amendment.”
Muslims nations are not like Christian nations: “Christians established America, specifically and purposefully drafting the 1st Amendment in order to prevent theocracy…The Christian West tends to recognize its sins, eventually, and confront them…Christian nations have produced outstanding prosperity, lifting people out of poverty at rates never before seen…Christian nations export food and charity and medical supplies, and they are the first to respond to natural disasters, even helping enemies rebuild after winning wars. More, and the Muslim side is in the article.

"And although it might make us feel better to assume that no culture and no religion carries its own unique flaws and pitfalls, the fact remains that Christians and Jews are not often found brutalizing innocent civilians in the name of their religion. And if such an anomaly were to occur, it would be quite easy to tell that the murderous Christian is not a fair representative of his Creed…And, please, don’t tell me that Muslims tend to be violent because they’re a historically oppressed people. All religions have been oppressed at one time or another, but Muslims have also always controlled wide swaths of the globe. Ever hear of the Ottoman Empire? And don’t try to work the Crusades into this conversation, unless you want to prove my point for me. The Crusades were waged against Muslim aggressors after several hundred years of persecution at the hands of Arabic forces. The Crusades were a war of defense, sparked, as usual, by Muslim conquest."
This Brit blasts bloody Islam.

“According to  The Religion of– there is at least 109 passages in the Koran that demand Muslims to wage war against non-Muslims . Here is but a partial list: Koran 2:244, 2:216, 3:56, 3:151, 4:74, 4:76, 4:89, 4:95, 4:104, 5:33, 8:12, 8:15, 8:39, 8:57, 8:67, 8:65, 9:5, 9:14, 9:20, 9:25, 9:30.”
“‘There was once a civilization that was the greatest in the world. It was able to create a continental super-state that stretched from ocean to ocean, and from northern climes to tropics and deserts.’ The Facts – The Ottoman Empire (1299-1922), was an Islamic Caliphate…a form of Islamic government led by a Caliph, a person considered a political and religious successor to their prophet Muhammed and a leader of the entire Muslim community ( Ummah ). They, like all Islamic movements since Muhammed, invaded non-Muslim lands and took land, pillaged, raped, tortured and slaughtered…all with the same goal of conquering the entire earth for Islam. They slaughtered their way through Christian Europe for 500 years…hence the reason for the Crusades (see THE CRUSADES: A Direct Response to Islam’s Bloodlust).”


Who we have coming across the border illegally are not akin to those who came by ship to the shores of America to whom the statue honors. Legal immigrants are welcome and should be given a place of refuge under the conditions set forth in our laws.
“(N)obody is suggesting that we break up families because that would be cruel! I am merely saying that they all get sent back together to where they came from. Now, if they wanted to come back to the states and enter  legally , then we could welcome you with open arms. In part, the 14th Amendment states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” This was originally passed to ensure slaves had the rights of other citizens, not for illegal aliens…(O)ur country can be choosie when it decides who we make legal. Take the best and the brightest who will add significant value to our work force. Taking a civics exam and learning English are non-negotiable.”


(Exploding Evil with Wit and Wisdom)

Burt Prelusky’s columns (via email and on his website) provide the best comedic condemnation of liberalism that exists. Below are some of the best of the best. Burt may be quoted in various categories too.

(L)iberals are quick to pull out their crying towels if they suspect that serial killers experience the slightest bit of discomfort while being executed, but are nonchalant when it comes to the Nazi-like butchery performed during a typical abortion. Liberal lunkheads are always defending Islam by pointing out that no more than 10% of 1.2 billion Muslims are willing to kill in the name of Mohammad. But, one, they never tell you how they arrive at that percentage or, two, why it is they never count the cheerleaders in the mosques and streets of Dearborn and Tehran. Something else they slide by is that even just one-tenth of 1.2 billion is 120 million people, a number larger than that of any nation in Europe, except for Russia, and nearly as many as the combined populations of England and France.

How can anyone successfully diagnose dementia in an aging liberal? I mean, what’s the tipoff? Do they suddenly wake up one day in their seventies or eighties and start making sense?

What I find fascinating is that it’s nearly always liberals who parrot Santayana’s line about those who refuse to learn from history being doomed to repeat it, but it’s always they who ignore the facts regarding the ultimate fate of every socialistic nation ranging from Soviet Russia to Nazi Germany, from Cuba to Greece. These days, whether they’re arguing for the absolute right to abortions on demand or same-sex marriages, liberals insist they’re on the right side of history, and then point to young voters as proof of that silly claim. Among liberals, the only people who have a looser grasp of history than elderly pinheads like Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Hillary Clinton, are the young pinheads in our college classrooms.

The reason that the problem has only gotten worse in the decades since Reagan got gulled by the Democrats into signing the amnesty in the mid-80s is because the various presidents and Congress had no real stake in the outcome. The Democrats saw illegal aliens as millions of potential votes, while Republicans, representing farm and other business interests, saw a constant flow of cheap labor. It’s only society at large that pays the price of being flooded with low-skilled, basically illiterate, foreigners. The fact that we continue to offer citizenship to babies born on our turf to people who have no business being here merely compounds the problem, and makes a mockery of what citizenship is supposed to mean. It’s worth noting that these babies, innocent though they are, happen to be the only people in America allowed to directly benefit from the commission of a crime.

I’m getting annoyed with all the controversy over the means by which murderers are sent off to meet their Maker. The way the louts have gone from opposing electric chairs and hangings to firing squads and chemical cocktails, you would think they were all residing on Death Row. The truth is that those opposed to executing the vilest members of the human race will never be satisfied.

In the beginning, those who objected to lawful executions based their objection on the misinterpretation of the Commandment against killing, arguing that the State has no more right to kill than the individual. When people started to catch on that the actual translation from the Hebrew prohibits murder, not state-authorized executions, the self-righteous busybodies had to change their tactics. They then made it their mission to make executions such a rarity that they could then trade on the use of the word “unusual,” as it appears in the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of “cruel and unusual punishment.”

About 10 years ago, when many of the same people argued that Terri Schiavo should be taken off life support, they insisted, as if they knew, that being deprived of food and water wouldn’t cause the 41 year old woman to experience the least bit of pain. I admit I was skeptical at the time, no matter Mrs. Schiavo’s cognitive state, but if starvation is agreeable to the other side, I am more than willing to deprive the sadists and serial killers on Death Row of food and drink for as long as it takes.

We’ve had race riots on a regular basis for nearly 50 years. I’m not referring to events like Selma, which were peaceful demonstrations that were turned into riots by the racist cops. But even the assassination of Martin Luther King was merely an excuse for black people to run amok, making asses of themselves by burning, breaking and looting. What a great way to pay tribute to the man who preached passive resistance to racial injustice!... We all know that most black people are not thugs, but, more and more often, it seems that most thugs are black people. Another lie we keep hearing from the Democrats running these civic cesspools is that not enough money is being spent on inner city public schools. They are, of course, merely parroting the propaganda of the teachers unions.

Ours is undeniably a trashy society . Our entertainment has grown increasingly obscene and pornographic; our media has become corrupt; education has morphed into state-sponsored propaganda; and our federal institutions, including the Justice Department, the Secret Service, Congress, the EPA and the IRS, have prostituted themselves, so that today Washington, D.C., more closely resembles a brothel than a national capita…(The election of a conservative president) would merely slow our descent, it would not stop it. Too many people get away with not paying income taxes. Swapping their liberty for food stamps, college tuitions and free cell phones, strikes them as a bargain.

For many years, I have resented Hollywood types who pretend, as all liberals do, that they cry themselves to sleep over the travails of the poor . I keep waiting to hear that one of them has decided that he or she doesn’t really need 10 or 15 million dollars for a movie, and has decided to divide one or two million among the supporting cast, the stuntmen, the makeup people, the gaffers and the grips. I’m still waiting.

It seems to me that when crazy white people like Adam Lanza, James Holmes and Dylann Roof, occasionally shoot a bunch of other white people, liberals will inevitably insist that stricter gun laws need to be enacted. But when 10 or 15 black people are shot by other black people on a typical weekend in Chicago , the poster city for gun control laws, liberals are as quiet as very shy mice. It makes me wonder if they really don’t believe that black lives matter all that much.

Even very young children are being urged these days to determine their own gender and their own names, and, with that, decide how they wish to dress and which bathroom to visit. It makes me wonder just how far this new open-minded policy goes. I mean, if there’s a long line at the men’s room and I decide to use the lady’s room, can I be arrested if I explain that I am in fact a 75-year-old black woman named Geraldine with a very small bladder and a great deal of attitude?

(O)n those occasions when liberals aren’t immoral, their tendency is to be amoral , seemingly unaware that there are principles and values without which we are no better than the beasts of the jungle. Instead, what passes for morality on the Left tends to be an eagerness to take up for those they determine to be underdogs. So they side with rampaging black thugs, illegal aliens and even the Palestinians, having decided that their terrorist activities are merely the actions of freedom fighters opposing Israeli oppression. What’s more, because leftists are as merciless as Islamic throat-cutters, they will never hesitate to lie if they feel it serves their purpose.

I gave a talk at a local Rotary Club. During the Q&A session, a member of the audience identified himself as a liberal and took me to task over something I’d said about Muslims. After trying, and no doubt failing, to set him straight, I asked him why he was a liberal . He puffed himself up, as these jerks are prone to do, and said it was mainly because he believed in social justice. I’m not sure if I called him a fool or only thought it, but I did point out to him that justice is justice, and doesn’t require any adjectives. In fact, once you begin to modify it, you’re perverting its meaning. The ideal, I explained, was one set of rules for rich and poor, black and white, men and women, young and old, liberals and conservatives, Muslims and Christians. It was bad enough having to explain all this to a fellow American. What made it worse is that he had identified himself as a lawyer.

According to Democrats running for office, black lives matter a lot. The left-wing media wholeheartedly agrees. So far as conservatives are concerned, all human lives matter, including those on the brink of being born. In fact, it sometimes seems that the only people who don’t give a damn about black lives are other blacks. Otherwise, you would have to wonder why they are always shooting one another…  I suspect that some people might label me a bigot.

I’m not, of course, but, then, that’s what bigots always say. However, in my defense, I would point out that whereas real bigots hate all blacks or all Jews or all Mormons, I can easily differentiate between people like Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams and Jason Riley and the likes of Al Sharpton, Valerie Jarrett and Eric Holder… (T)he confusion comes at election time, when 90-95% of all black Americans, the decent and the indecent, the productive and the parasitical, join forces to vote for all the plantation owners sporting a (D) after their names.

(T)he U.N. is a collection of well-dressed thugs representing the worst despots the world has to offer?

So far as liberals…are concerned, dead people only count if they happen to be black criminals killed by white cops, not if, as in the majority of cases, they’re black people being killed by other black people.

Similarly, so far as liberals are concerned, innocent lives only matter when we’re talking about Muslims, not Jews or Christians…But, how much more evil are those committing these acts than those who merely stand by and watch?...Western leaders show far more remorse over Muslims being insulted than Christians being slaughtered.  

What makes those on the Left so despicable isn’t merely that they happen to be wrong on all the issues, but that they lie. And even when their lies are pointed out, they never apologize; instead, they tell even bigger whoppers, expecting that the opposition will finally throw up its hands in frustration.

(L) iberal drivel … states that the federal government is the fount of all wisdom and that politicians and bureaucrats spend our money more wisely than we do and are in the best position to determine how the rest of us live our lives.”

“White people, politicians in particular, are terrified of being called racists . What makes their concern so peculiar is that no matter what they say or do, blacks and other liberals will always label them as such. As I see it, being someone that Obama, Holder or Sharpton, calls a racist is a commendation. But leave it to craven Republican politicians to worry about people who will never vote for them not voting for them!”

“Generally, when Democrats brag that they’re the ones with a sense of humor, pointing with pride to the likes of David Letterman, Bill Maher, Joy Behar and Jon Stewart, they only sound foolish. Unless you’re a registered Democrat, meaning that you are ready to laugh at any insult, no matter how lame, directed at Republicans, you’d be hard-pressed to find anything they say even slightly amusing,” notes Burt Prelutsky .

In spite   of constantly lying and cheating, liberals always claim to hold title to the moral high ground. Their instinct is always to pretend to care about things they don’t… But, thanks to a corrupt media, the liberals are always able to say or do anything they like without having their motives questioned.

How stupid are liberals? Well, for openers, they wear Che Guevara’s likeness on their shirts, passing him off as a freedom fighter, even though he was Fidel Castro’s chief executioner… The truth is that once you start listing the things that liberals have been wrong about over the decades, there’s no end in sight…

In the 50s, when the liberals weren’t busy spying for the Soviet Union and sending our atomic bomb secrets to their favorite uncle, they were pushing Truman and Eisenhower to end the Cold War. By the 1960s, the liberals were insisting that the U.S. unilaterally disarm, confident that the Soviet Union would then follow suit. But, then, liberals always believe that if we only set what they regard as a good example, even the most brutal dictatorships will be moved to do the same.

Liberals pretend that photo IDs are essential if you wish to buy a beer, board a plane or attend an Obama speech, but evil if they’re required for voting.

Liberals are so stupid, they believe the federal government is a money-making enterprise, pretending that printing and spending money is just the same as earning it.

I suppose each of us must determine for himself if the crime taking place is suicide by means of a slow-acting poison or murder that can be laid at the feet of homicidal liberals, but I don’t think there can be any question that America is not long for this world.

“Unfortunately, the GOP prefers to be the minority party because Republican politicians find it so much more comfortable whining about the Democrats than actually having to do anything themselves. But, then, unlike Democrats, Republicans very rarely agree about what actually needs to be done. As a result, they generally twiddle their thumbs while waiting for the glorious day when the liberals regain power and they can get back to their whining.”

“I might understand it if liberals merely conned themselves into believing they are nicer and more compassionate than conservatives, if only because they’ve claimed it for so long, it would be a miracle if by this time they didn’t accept it on faith. But studies have shown that they contribute less time and money to charity than those they demean as cruel and heartless. What I don’t get is how they’ve managed to convince themselves they’re more intelligent than the rest of us. These people are so dumb they actually fall for every hoax that comes down the pike."

“(E)ven I would like to pass myself off as open-minded by occasionally being able to agree with liberals about something, about anything. But whether the topic is the criminal justice system, affirmative action, gun control, taxes, labor unions, energy, education, the FCC, the EPA, Vladimir Putin, ISIS, Israel or Iran, they (liberals) are simply wrong on every issue. As a result, the only way I could pass myself off as fair-minded would be to prove that I, too, am certifiably insane.”


[If you see any (starting 1-1-15) I missed, please email me with the citation. Thanks.]

A handout called “12 easy steps on the way to gender inclusiveness” advised teachers to: Step 8: “Be intolerant of openly hostile attitudes or references towards others… on their statements about gender. Being punitive may stop the behavior, at least in your presence. Being instructive may stop it entirely.” Step 10: “Avoid using ‘normal’ to define any behaviors.”

The Nasa climate scientists who claimed 2014 set a new record for global warmth last night admitted they were only 38 per cent sure this was true.

Michael Moore calls snipers 'cowards' on Twitter.

The Rev. Al Sharpton announced he was holding an “emergency meeting” to discuss Hollywood’s all-white list of Oscar nominees



“They are not gone and they are not…forgiving.” This describes the Left. They never give up. They never stop. Their totalitarian leanings, described even by Aristotle in his Republic, are never satiated… have you noticed how quickly the Left goes off topic or   ad hominem  when you challenge their falsehoods? Cries of bigotry, racism…” Michael Cummings


Also see:

Things that Bug Me

Liberals Don’t Have a Leg to Stand On

"Political Bugs"

"If it wasn’t so Funny I’d Cry"

"Exodus Mandate Articles"

"Religion Rules in Kanawha County Schools"

My Blog


Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.
1 Timothy 5:20

Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.
James 4:7

For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds; Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ.
II Corinthians 10:4-5